7 Colonial comparisons. Concluding remarks
Transcript
7 Colonial comparisons. Concluding remarks
7 Colonial comparisons. Concluding remarks Au vrai, notre projet ne consiste pas à établir un inventaire de tous les phénomènes d'expansion ou de colonisation, ou à banaliser le phénomène colonial européen; mais bien, à l'occasion, à le confronter à d'autres.1 Marc Ferro, Histoire des colonisations (1994), 8 7.1 History, Structure and Material Culture Comparing the three colonial situations discussed in the foregoing chapters may finally contribute to a better understanding of colonialism in a general sense. As the basic instrument of modern anthropology, the comparative method has been fruitfully used as a means to distinguish between contingent historical circumstances and structural features of the phenomena under study. With regard to colonialism in particular, whether ancient or (early) modern, comparison can help overcome monolithic representations. Moreover, comparing the present three colonial situations clarifies not only the structural properties of the three instances of colonialism but also those of west central Sardinian society, because they occurred in the same region and were historically related to each other. In the case of west central Sardinia during the first millennium BC, the structural properties of the situations are in the first place constituted by the region and its cultural background. They consisted of the physical landscape as well as of the past of indigenous Nuragic settlement and external contacts with the nearby islands and surrounding coasts of the western Mediterranean and together made up Braudel's longue durée time-scale. Contemporary wider historical conditions, however, remained far from constant during the first millennium BC, as has been amply illustrated in the foregoing chapters. However, for any given moment in each of the three situations the historical context constituted an important structuring element, in particular because of the involvement of the region in the wider colonial networks. If the conventional distinction between history and structure is therefore difficult to uphold, as Marshall Sahlins has claimed (1985, 136-156), the succession of and historical connections between the three colonial situations examined are even more significant because they highlight how one colonial situation rooted in its predecessor. A cursory overview of the previous three chapters makes it clear that close connections coexisted with salient discrepancies: the colonial situations of the Punic and Roman periods presented many similarities, whereas the Phoenician period and Nuragic Iron Age seem to have been utterly different from the later two periods. Precisely because of the differences, the Phoenician/Iron Age period illustrates these points: while this period can hardly be labelled as colonial, since the Phoenician impact on and involvement in the region remained rather limited, during this very same period the foundations were laid for later Carthaginian and Roman domination over the region. The role played by the originally Phoenician settlements as the urban foci of the region in the later periods is the most obvious example, as they not only provided a bridgehead for later colonial intervention but also largely structured subsequent regional organization. This holds in particular for the tree-partite division of the region in Punic and Roman times between Tharros, the coastal strip with Neapolis and Othoca, and the interior of the central Campidano and the Marmilla. It can be traced back to the Iron Age, when Phoenician presence developed in two stages from the Tharros and the S. Marco peninsula to the Arborèa, while Nuragic settlement remained confined to the interior, withdrawing even further inland at a later moment (pp. 104-107). This case moreover demonstrates that it was not the Phoenician presence alone which structured the precolonial situation and gave rise to the later colonial ones but rather that it was the entanglement of colonial and indigenous elements which jointly (re-)organized the region. The label ‘precolonial’ for the Phoenician and Iron Age period is therefore a most fitting one, as the developments of this time not simply preceded but more importantly also paved the way for the later colonial situation of the Punic period (cf. p. 71). The structural role of history is exhibited most clearly by the mismatch between the wider historical conditions and events on the one hand and regional or local developments on the other: the so-called conjonctures clearly evolved at a different pace when compared to regional trends, despite their structuring of the wider conditions (cf. Braudel 1972, 899900). The discrepancy between the Roman dominance over Carthage in the western Mediterranean and the persistence of 211 Carthaginian influence in Sardinia is a clear case in point (p. 161): since the discussion of this situation in chapter six (pp. 146-157) has demonstrated the essentially local background of this phenomenon, it follows logically that the structuring role of history is often mediated by the local context. In order to bring out what Sahlins has termed the ‘structure of the conjuncture’ which he defined as the ‘practical realization’ of the general trends in any particular context (1985, xiv; 152-154), it is therefore necessary to emphasize the specific local and historical circumstances ‘on the ground’. In particular with regard to studies of colonialism, in which the interplay between wider structures and local conditions should take a prominent place, this argument supports the local focus which I have proposed as a defining feature of a postcolonial archaeology (p. 34). A final critical element which has surfaced in all discussions of the three (pre-)colonial situations regards the role of material culture in society. More particularly, it has repeatedly been pointed out that material culture cannot be seen as having some intrinsic value deriving from its foreign or indigenous provenance. In this way it is for instance possible to understand the ways in which individual imports circulated in Nuragic Iron Age society: as the indigenous contexts of the imports appear to correspond closely to those of indigenous elite items in general, it can be argued that Phoenician, Greek or Etruscan imports in Nuragic Iron Age society were perceived in terms of Nuragic values rather than exclusively appreciated for their connections with the colonial worlds (p. 111). More spectacular perhaps was the role of material culture in the Punic period, when colonial objects were massively and whole-sale adopted throughout the region at the expense of older indigenous products. Rather than interpreting this rapid spread of Punic material culture as denoting a large-scale Carthaginian occupation of and immigration into the region, it was argued that the adoption of Punic material culture by the local inhabitants was a much more ‘superficial’ development which affected only certain dimensions of society. New forms of settlement and land use for instance occurred exclusively in the coastal Arborèa and apparently important indigenous values and traditions were shielded off from colonial interference, as show the rituals performed in the shrine of Genna Maria. The meanings attributed to Punic material culture in the 5th and 4th centuries BC were therefore first and foremost constructed in the local context and they were used to build up a new society in the colonial situation (cf. pp. 151-156). In the ensuing Roman Republican period, material culture was used in basically similar ways in order to make sense of the new situation. In the circumstances of that time, Punic material culture could be represented as ‘indigenous’ while the meaning of colonial (Roman) objects was much more contested, as the objects 212 were ignored by some people and adopted by others (pp. 205-209). Again, the colonial situation has brought out the different and shifting meanings attributed to material culture, which were clearly related to the structural conditions of the time but which at the same time were actively constructed and altered by the local inhabitants of the colonized region. While more detailed conclusions about particular issues of each of the three (pre-)colonial situations can be found in the concluding sections of the previous three chapters, in the next two sections I shall now return to the basic issues which were raised in the second chapter and which I have repeatedly touched upon in the discussions of the specific situations of west central Sardinia (chapters 4-6). These basic issues can briefly be characterized with the terms ‘postcolonialism’ and ‘resistance and identity’. 7.2 On Colonial Categories and Cultural Concerns Both basic tenets of the postcolonial approach outlined in chapter two are related to issues of categorization in colonial situations: one concerns the importance of breaking down dualist categories. As a result, particular significance is attributed to the role of intermediate social groups. The other pertains to the categorization of colonialism as an historical phenomenon, which in practice means the shift in attention from exclusively political and military matters to the cultural dimensions of colonial situations. Together with the remarks about the local focus in the previous section, the following observations are intended to be an evaluation of the archaeological implementation of the postcolonial perspective as proposed in chapter two (pp. 33-35). The discussion of the archaeological literature on ancient colonialism in the Mediterranean has made clear that onesided representations still abound, no matter whether of a colonialist or nativist perspective, and that they have now at best been replaced by a dualist approach (pp. 18-22). However, chapters five and six on the Carthaginian and Roman colonial situations have provided ample arguments for abandoning these dichotomies and asserting the role of intermediate categories emphasized in postcolonial theory. The town of Neapolis in many ways epitomizes the intermediate categories of west central Sardinia under Carthaginian authority, as it largely bridges the assumed colonial divide between the colonial Punic and indigenous Sardinian inhabitants (cf. pp. 151-156). It does so in the first place as a prominent feature of the coastal cultural landscape, situated in-between the thoroughly colonial situation of Tharros and Cape S. Marco and the more outspokenly indigenous character of the interior. Within the coastal landscape, Neapolis occupied a crucial place as the focal point of rural settlement. Neapolis thus lay not only in-between in a literal sense but also metaphorically, exemplified by the locally created and produced figurines of the healing sanctuary (fig. 5-18). The settlement itself was also typical of the intermediate nature of Neapolis, as such large nucleated settlements clearly represent a colonial innovation; this is confirmed by the colonial origin of the town as a Carthaginian foundation. However, it did not meet the more strictly colonial and urban standards set by Tharros and the other colonial cities, which consequently detracts from the colonial status of Neapolis. The closer involvement of the town in the rural hinterland and the relative absence of artisanal production further curtailed the colonial dimension of Neapolis. Since the general situation did not change much in the earlier Roman period, the same arguments apply to Neapolis in Republican times. West central Sardinia in the Phoenician/Iron Age period on the contrary appears to contradict the postcolonial repudiation of colonial dualisms, since the regional situation of that period was defined by a sharp contrast between Phoenician colonial presence along the coast and Iron Age Nuragic settlement in the interior (pp. 104-107). In this case, however, the evident separation between colonial and indigenous settlement should not so much be interpreted as a colonial divide but rather as denoting a precolonial situation in which both ‘sides’ essentially remained independent from each other. Since the precolonial characteristics of this particular situation have been deduced from other evidence, they cannot rebut the foregoing arguments about the later colonial situations. When considered in the wider context of the whole of Sardinia, however, the separation between the Phoenician foundations on the southern and western Sardinian coasts and Nuragic Iron Age settlement in the interior and the northern half of the island can be argued to have been much less definite. Although the contrast between the two settlement systems was a significant characteristic of west central Sardinian regional organization, the Phoenician foundations did not constitute the exclusive contact points with the outside world for the indigenous inhabitants. On the contrary, extensive networks had already been established long before the Phoenicians set foot ashore in Sardinia and they continued to function after these newcomers had founded their colonial settlements. Although the importation of foreign objects has for a long time been automatically ascribed to Phoenician intervention, detailed study of the distribution of the imports and their indigenous contexts has now shown that importation was anything but a colonial prerogative and that the Nuragic Sardinians themselves were equally active in maintaining exchange contacts (Ugas/Zucca 1984, 58-86). The ongoing contacts of Nuragic Sardinia with Etruscan Tuscany throughout the 7th and 6th centuries BC clearly show that the precolonial situation was not determined by a dichotomy between colonizing Phoenicians and colonized Sardinians alone but included Etruscans as well; from the 7th century BC onwards, a distinction can even be made between northern and southern Etruscans (pp. 79-80). Since this resulted in a divergence between the northern part of the island where contacts with the Italian mainland were dominant, and the southern regions of the island, including west central Sardinia, which interacted primarily with the nearby Phoenician settlements, the island as a whole was characterized by three major groups, namely the inhabitants of the ‘two Sardinias’ in roughly the northern and southern parts of the island (Gras 1985, 126) and the Phoenicians on the southern and western coasts. If the general situation of Iron Age Sardinia was thus far too complex and involved too many participants to be reduced to a simple dualist (pre-)colonial situation, the regional context of west central Sardinia likewise resisted such a categorization: the contraction of indigenous settlement into the interior and the increased distribution of Etruscan and Greek imports in the central Campidano by the end of the 7th century BC similarly suggest that the local inhabitants were far from dependent on the Phoenician foundations for their contacts with the outside world (p. 103; cf. Gras 1985, 113-244). If the over-all precolonial and colonial situations cannot be fitted into a dualist scheme, the shortcomings of these representations are perhaps still more convincingly demonstrated by several minor instances of blurred colonial categories which can be found throughout the region in each of the three periods examined. A case in point are the villages in the Marmilla during the Punic and Roman Republican period which on the one hand denote an ‘indigenous’ way of settlement and land use, emphasized by the association with a nuraghe, but on the other hand these villages also comprise numerous typically ‘colonial’ elements such as domestic pottery of exclusively colonial types, the use of ceramic roof tiles and in some cases even the house type itself (as at Marfudi: fig. 6-12). Compared to these, the single farms of the southern Arborèa and the towns of Neapolis and Othoca represented a relatively ‘pure’ or outspoken example of colonial settlement. However, it is precisely the relativity of the colonial or indigenous nature of these sites which comes to the heart of the matter: just as Neapolis seems much less completely colonial when compared to Tharros or Carthage, likewise the Roman villages of the Marmilla are much less ‘indigenous’ in comparison to contemporary settlements in northern or north-eastern Sardinia which adhered much more closely to older Nuragic traditions (cf. Lilliu 1988, 474-480). Other examples of blurred categories are the Punic and Roman shrines in Nuragic monumental constructions, usually nuraghi but occasionally also well-sanctuaries. The intricate nature of these cults and rituals has already been discussed at length and need not be repeated here (see pp. 151-156, 213 201-205). These cases show that hybridization processes often played a critical role in the blurring of colonial categories and the transgression of colonial boundaries (see next section). The second postcolonial tenet concerning the categorization of colonialism as an historical phenomenon is perhaps best illustrated by the observation that despite habitual associations with issues of power and domination, both the discussion above and the interpretative sections of the chapters four, five and six have only touched upon these issues in passing. The cultural aspects of the (pre-)colonial situations have been foregrounded, without, however, ignoring economic and political elements altogether. Emblematic in this respect are the questions of settlement location and land use, which take a prominent place in this study: obviously, they have an important economic dimension but cannot be reduced to it, as I have argued by drawing attention to the apparent avoidance of nuraghi in the southern Arborèa. In fact, the very notion of a cultural landscape presupposes that there is much more to land use and settlement than merely tilling the soil or selecting profitable site catchments (cf. Tilley 1994, 11-34). Overlooking the discussions and interpretations of the three (pre-)colonial situations, the postcolonial emphasis on cultural issues appears to be particularly significant for an archaeological approach, since military events and political regulations are notoriously difficult to detect archaeologically. The discussion of Sardinia under the Roman Republic in chapter six illustrates this point most conclusively: whereas the military interventions and the political exploitation of the island are primarily or often exclusively attested by literary evidence, the archaeological record sheds extensive light on cultural aspects of the colonial situation. Moreover, these have revealed the pervasiveness of colonial domination or rather on the limits of it. In this way, the Neapolis figurines (fig. 5-18) have for instance been interpreted as denoting a local or popular (sub)culture which could be related to the intermediate position of the town in the region. Apart from the fact that these statuettes are another example of blurred colonial categories, both the figurines and the fertility rituals of the Genna Maria shrine show that the impact of colonial culture touched virtually all parts of society. At the same time, the attention for both economic and cultural aspects of colonialism has revealed similarities and discrepancies between different social ‘levels’ (to use the Dumontian term). In the Punic period, for instance, the virtually complete domination of Punic norms at the level of daily life and agricultural production contrasted markedly with the fertility cult performed at Genna Maria, in which older ‘traditional’ forms were preserved and colonial influences were admitted much more selectively. Postcolonial attention for cultural aspects is, therefore, partly founded on its contribution to the interpretation of the values 214 of local society under colonial rule. Equally important is that it provides a starting-point for examining the impact of colonial authority not just as political or military domination but also as a more subtle cultural hegemony. Precisely because of this shift in attention, the postcolonial perspective has a most promising archaeological potential for studying colonialism. 7.3 Hybridization, local identities and resistance As their repeated occurrence in the previous chapters has already signalled, the terms ‘hybridization’ and ‘local identity’ are of critical importance to understand the ways in which colonial categories can be blurred and boundaries transgressed. They can in fact be regarded as key words in a postcolonial approach to colonialism. In this final section, I shall therefore consider these two terms and their implications in the light of the archaeological analyses of the foregoing chapters. To conclude, I shall dwell upon the frequently used term of ‘resistance’, which necessarily comes to mind. The clearest instance of hybridization observed in the three periods studied is that of the cult celebrated in Roman times in the reused well-sanctuary of Cuccuru s'Arriu (pp. 203205). In the first place, a more appropriate label than ‘hybrid’ is hard to find to characterize the multiple background of the rituals performed, the objects used and the place occupied in one and the same context. The thorough integration of the diverse elements only adds to this. Secondly, the case of Cuccuru s'Arriu most explicitly exposes the problematic nature of terms such as ‘indigenous’, ‘colonial’, ‘Punic’, Roman’ etc. In particular, precisely because of the entanglement of the elements involved, it is difficult to sustain the essentialist meanings usually attributed to these labels: must the rituals performed at Cuccuru s'Arriu be defined as ‘colonial’ because of their Punic background or as ‘indigenous’ given the contemporary widespread opposition between Punic and Roman? Moreover, what exactly does the label ‘Punic’ cover in such a context? Does it refer to an ‘authentic’ Punic culture in North Africa or does it allude to the local Sardinian version? A similarly intricate web of meanings and backgrounds was pointed out in the discussion of the Neapolis figurines (pp. 154-155): given the diverse backgrounds of the statuettes, it is unclear whether they should be classified as colonial or indigenous. As I have shown in the foregoing chapters, the way out of this disarray is to abandon these essentialist questions and to specify such qualifications within their particular setting. To use the term which Foucault borrowed from Nietzsche, in order to understand the hybridization processes it is necessary to trace the genealogy of the individual terms and to consider the various relationships between the separate components and their backgrounds because these classificatory labels ‘have no essence or [...] their essence was fabricated in a piecemeal fashion from alien forms’ (Foucault 1971, 142 quoted in Dreyfus/Rabinow 1982, 107; emphasis added). It is this creative nature of hybridization processes which explains the terms ‘local culture’ and ‘identity’ and which leads to their recognition as social constructs (cf. Kellner 1992, 143-145). Because local cultures and identities are part and parcel of the contemporary social context, the meanings of their components necessarily refer to that very same context, whereas their ‘origins’ may but need not play a part (Marcus 1992, 309-315). Given these references, identities can be labelled ‘local’ without being inherently linked to the actual provenance of their constituents (cf. Rouse 1995). Since identities are above all situational, they are inevitably subject to historical changes and connected with aspects such as gender, class, professional activities, religion etc. (cf. discussion in Miller 1994, 257-290). In this light it is understandable that the Punic rituals which were originally — but not essentially — colonial could be reconsidered and recategorized — ‘fabricated’ in Foucault's words — as indigenous ones. The general relevance of this process is illustrated by the modern representation of the Sardinian language as the very essence of indigenous Sardinian identity today. In the modern context of the Italian state, this language is sufficiently different from its Italian counterpart to serve as a vehicle of opposition. The ‘fact’ that the Sardinian language ‘originally’ derived from Latin, which was the language of the Roman colonizers, cannot, in this view, contradict its contemporary social and cultural connotations. As pointed out in chapter two (pp. 24-32), resistance as a theme is the necessary companion of studies of power and domination. As such, its repeated appearance in the foregoing interpretations of the three Sardinian (pre-)colonial situations need not cause surprise; it is rather the limited and only most recent attention for this theme in Mediterranean archaeology which calls for explanation. The Sardinian case studies have moreover demonstrated the close connections between local culture and resistance, which I have considered from a theoretical point of view in chapter two (pp. 3133). The link between these two is what Homi Bhabha has called the ambivalence of hybridization, which gives local cultures a potential of subversion and resistance per se (Bhabha 1992b, 66; cf. p. 25). The colonial situation of the Roman Republican period has demonstrated that resistance nevertheless remains a somewhat elusive concept because of its contiguity with the construction of local identities. Apart from situations of outspoken resistance which may be accompanied by armed rebellion, such as the Sardinian revolt against the Roman authorities in 215 BC, unequivocal examples of everyday or cultural resistance have been difficult to identify. Rather than trying to impose rigid classifications, it therefore seems appropriate to acknowledge the inherent ambiguities and to accept them as critical elements of the colonial situation. A similar position has been taken by Lila Abu-Lughod in her studies of Bedouin communities in contemporary Egypt (1986; 1990). Citing Foucault, who has pointed out that resistance can be used ‘as a chemical catalyst so as to bring to light power relations, locate their position, find out their points of application and the methods used’ (Foucault 1982, 211), she has argued that too narrow a focus on resistance entails the risk of overlooking its implications and its relationships to power. Instead, she has proposed that resistance should be regarded as a diagnostic of power which allows probing its workings (Abu-Lughod 1990, 42). In the case of Roman Republican Sardinia, the many possible instances of cultural resistance among the rural and urban communities of the island can thus be interpreted as a response to equally tacit and veiled forms of Roman cultural dominance. The significance of such a representation of Roman rule is that it is by and large corroborated by archaeological evidence from the Republican period. Roman domination conceived as both cultural hegemony and economic exploitation explains why the Roman confiscation of Sardinian lands and the imposition of heavy taxation could for a long time remain without appreciable consequences for rural settlement and land use: in this view, the local inhabitants of the region complied with the imposed taxes but reacted in the first place to Roman cultural hegemony by holding on to traditional patterns of settlement and land use instead of ‘rationally’ adapting these to the imposed Roman political and economic measures. With regard to Roman domination, this means that the harsher economic and political aspects of Roman power were complemented by a less strict cultural hegemony which allowed the local inhabitants to preserve much of their traditional way of life. As shown in chapter six (pp. 205-206), this only resulted in significant changes of rural settlement in the course of the (later) 1st century BC. With regard to the two colonial situations sensu stricto, resistance has been fruitfully used in order to lay bare the workings of colonial power and to gain some insight into the hierarchies of values of local society. However, there is no point in denying that awareness of this concept and the recent surge in studies of resistance in both anthropology and, albeit more reluctantly, archaeology are intimately related to late 20th century ideas about colonialism, power and local cultures, in short, to postcolonialism as a product of Western (postmodern) society. Because of this link, which is presumably just as strong as the one between imperialist Western society and early 20th century archaeology and historiography, it remains important to consider the reasons why resistance is worth studying. Morality or political correctness to highlight the oppressed is surely not enough in itself (Brown 1996). The extensive discussions of Gramsci's 215 and Bourdieu's ideas about hegemony as a means of establishing and maintaining power in colonial situations and their adoption in the detailed analyses of the three (pre-)colonial situations of west central Sardinia have nevertheless shown, I suggest, that cultural resistance does offer a useful tool in order to probe the murky corners of colonialism and to understand how people from different backgrounds can make a colonial situation conceivable and bearable. The value of these insights, and perhaps, as a corollary, of this thesis, can perhaps most appropriately be illustrated by referring to modern 20th century Sardinian representations of ancient colonialism and indigenous values. As the earlier remark about the Latin roots of the Sardinian language today and its modern perception demonstrate, the past plays an important role in the construction of contemporary Sardinian identities. In order to stress the fundamental difference between the island and the Italian mainland, proving the authenticity of Sardinian indigenous culture has become an important theme, in which archaeology has increasingly become involved (cf. Clark 1996, 97-99). Cultural resistance is a key term in this respect which is frequently used as a means to indicate how the islanders managed to retain their own ‘truly indigenous’ culture and identity under the long succession of foreign occupations. Emblematic in this respect are the last phrases of Giovanni Lilliu's overview of Nuragic culture: The romanization of the indigenous inhabitants of the interior of the island was a matter of language and less so one of culture. Much less was it one of spirit. Even Christian religion had to leave ample space — as it still does — to an instinctive and magical spirituality. The real transformation of these rebellious but generous people is only taking effect in our days, in the face of resistances which go back to ancient ethics, to a religion of tradition; resistances which need to be understood, not repressed in order to allow for the rise of a truly new world based on a modern Sardinian culture.2 Lilliu 1988, 481; original emphases The observations and conclusions in this chapter may suffice to put these claims into perspective. I explicitly do not wish to imply by this, however, that such statements are merely illusory or even false because they do not correspond to academic representations. Nor do I intend to claim the representation of the past as a scholarly privilige which must be defended against politically inspired distortions. I rather wish to assert the very reality of such claims as cited above. As I 216 argued earlier in this section with regard to the Sardinian language, there are ample historical and linguistic arguments to dimiss the ‘authenticity’ ascribed to it, but these do not detract from the very real connotations of Sardinian identity and opposition to the Italian state which it carries nowadays. The role of the archaeologist or historian in such a context should therefore not be restricted, to my mind, to denouncing the artificiality of claims about the past and to debunking the ‘invention of traditions’. Whilst recognizing that inventing traditions is an historical process which has taken place time and again, academic studies of the past should also, and perhaps primarily so, be based on an awareness of the past in its contemporary social setting. If we accept that ‘our constructions of real pasts are not sacro-sanct, but [..] important elements in a continuing dialogue and dialectic’ (Keesing 1989, 37), then perhaps conflicts about the use of and access to archaeological monuments such as described by Odermatt (1996) for nuraghe Losa can be avoided. That might not only contribute to a more nuanced understanding of these monuments in contemporary society (cf. Herzfeld 1996, 120), whether local Sardinian or modern Italian, but it could also preserve the more recent cultural biographies of these monuments, which have continuously occupied a prominent place in the Sardinian landscapes since their construction. With this study, I hope to have contributed, among other things, to reflection on the role of colonialism and local identities in the Sardinian past. notes 1 Naturally, our project does not consist of making an inventory of all instances of expansion or colonization, or of belittling European colonialism; it does, on the contrary, include comparing it to other examples. 2 ‘La romanizzazione delle genti indigene del Centro isolano fu, del resto, un fatto di lingua e in minor misura di cultura. Tanto meno fu un fatto di anima. La stessa religione cristiana fece — come fa ancora — larga concessione a una spiritualità istintiva e magica. E, in fondo, una vera trasformazione di quelle genti ribelli ma generose, sta cominciando ad avvenire soltanto oggi, con resistenze dovute a un'etica antica, a una religione della tradizione, resistenze che hanno bisogno di essere comprese, non represse, perché sorga veramente un mondo nuovo, fondato su una moderna cultura sarda.’ references Abu-Lughod, J. 1980. Rabat. Urban apartheid in Morocco. Princeton. Abu-Lughod, L. 1986. Veiled sentiments: honor and poetry in a Bedouin society. Berkeley/Los Angeles. Abu-Lughod, L. 1990. The romance of resistance: tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women, American Ethnologist 17, 41-55. Acquaro, E. 1978. Lo scavo del 1977 (Tharros IV), Rivista di Studi Fenici 6, 67-68. Acquaro, E. 1983. Nuove ricerche a Tharros, in: Atti del I congresso internazionale di studi fenici e punici, Roma 5-10 novembre 1979, 624-631. Roma. Acquaro, E. 1984. La campagna del 1983 (Tharros X), Rivista di Studi Fenici 12, 49-51. Alvar, J. 1991. La caída de Tiro y sus repercussiones en el Mediterráneo, in: La caída de Tiro y el auge de Cartago (V Jornadas de arqueología fenicio-púnica, Ibiza 1990), 19-27. Ibiza. Amadasi Guzzo, M.G. 1987. Forme di scrittura fenicia in Sardegna, in: G. Lilliu, G. Ugas & G. Lai (eds), La Sardegna nel Mediterraneo tra il secondo e il primo millennio a.C. (Atti del II convegno di studi ‘Un millennio di relazioni fra la Sardegna e i paesi del Mediterraneo’, Selargius-Cagliari 27-30 novembre 1986), 377-390. Cagliari. Amadasi Guzzo, M.G. 1992. Divertimento 1991. Ancora sulla Cartagine di Sardegna, in: R. Tykot & T. Andrews (eds), Sardinia in the Mediterranean: a footprint in the sea (= Monographs in Mediterranean Archaeology 3), 439-447. Sheffield. Ameling, W. 1993. Karthago. Studien zur Militär, Staat und Gesellschaft (= Vestigia 45). München. Angioni, G. 1990. Tutti dicono Sardegna. Cagliari. Acquaro, E. & M. Uberti 1984. Lo scavo del 1983 (Tharros X), Rivista di Studi Fenici 12, 53-71. Acquaro, E., L. Godart, F. Mazza & D. Musti (eds) 1988. Momenti precoloniali nel Mediterraneo antico. Questioni di metodo – Aree d'indagine – Evidenze a confronto. Roma. Adas, M. 1981. From avoidance to confrontation: peasant protest in precolonial and colonial Southeast Asia, Comparative Studies in Society and History 23, 217-247. Adas, M. 1991. South Asian resistance in comparative perspective, in: D. Haynes & G. Prakash (eds), Contesting power: resistance and everyday social relations in South Asia, 290-305. Berkeley. Agus, T. 1985. L'antico bacino minerario neapolitano, in: A. Mastino (ed.), L'Africa Romana VIII, Sassari (Atti del VII convegno di studi, Sassari 15-17 dicembre 1989), 447-455. Sassari. Agus, T. 1995. Guspini Montevecchio. Oristano. Agus, T. & C. Lampis 1992. Guspini, cronistoria e immagini. Cagliari. Alcock, S., J. Cherry & J. Davis 1994. Intensive survey, agricultural practice and the classical landscape of Greece, in: I. Morris (ed.), Classical Greece. Ancient histories and modern archaeologies, 137-170. Cambridge. Alcock, S. 1993. Graecia capta. The landscapes of Roman Greece. Cambridge. Annis, M.B. in press. Paesaggi rurali nella Sardegna centro-occidentale. Il progetto Riu Mannu dell'Università di Leiden (Paesi Bassi), in: M. Khanoussi, P. Ruggeri & C. Vismara (eds), L'Africa romana XII. L'organizzazione dello spazio rurale nelle province del Nord Africa e nella Sardegna. Sassari. Annis, M.B., P. Van Dommelen & P. Van de Velde 1993/1994. The Riu Mannu survey project in west central Sardinia: a first interim report, Newsletter of the Department of Pottery Technology 11/12, 31-44. Annis, M.B., P. Van Dommelen & P. Van de Velde 1995. Rural settlement and socio-political organization. The Riu Mannu survey project, Sardinia, BABesch 70, 133-152. Annis, M.B., P. Van Dommelen & P. Van de Velde 1996. Insediamento rurale e organizzazione politica: il progetto archeologico ‘Riu Mannu’ in Sardegna, Quaderni della Soprintendenza Archeologica di Cagliari e Oristano 13, 255-286. Arias, P. 1995. Il mito dell'archeologia italiana. Due ‘patres conscripti' all'inizio delle leggi sulle antichità dopo il 1870, Rendiconti dell'Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei. Classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche ser. 9 (6), 237-245. Arnold, D. 1984. Gramsci and peasant subalternity in India, Journal of Peasant Studies 11, 155-177. Artudi, G. n.d. La necropoli di Pauli Putzu, unpublished typescript. Terralba. 217 Artudi, G. 1991. Le origini del vino a Terralba, unpublished typescript. Terralba. Aubet, M.E. 1993. The Phoenicians and the West. Politics, colonies and trade. Cambridge. Artudi, G. & S. Perra 1992. Neapolis, unpublished typescript. Terralba. Badas, U. 1985. Ceramica nuragica, in: C. Lilliu (ed.), Territorio di Gesturi. Censimento archeologico, 151- 179. Cagliari. Artudi, G. & S. Perra 1993. La ceramica fine da mensa, unpublished typescript. Terralba. Badas, U. 1987. Genna Maria-Villanovaforru (Cagliari). I vani 1018. Nuovi apporti allo studio delle abitazioni a Corte Centrale, in: G. Lilliu, G. Ugas & G. Lai (eds), La Sardegna nel Mediterraneo tra il secondo e il primo millennio a.C. (Atti del II convegno di studi ‘Un millennio di relazioni fra la Sardegna e i paesi del Mediterraneo’, Selargius-Cagliari 27-30 novembre 1986), 133-146. Cagliari. Artudi, G. & S. Perra 1994. Gli insediamenti punico-romani nel territorio di Terralba, Terralba ieri & oggi 8-16, 32-38. Artudi, G. & S. Perra 1995. Gli insediamenti preistorici nel territorio di Terralba, Terralba ieri & oggi 9-17, 28-33. Artudi, G. & S. Perra 1996. Il periodo nuragico nel territorio di Terralba, Terralba ieri & oggi 19. Artudi, G. & S. Perra 1997. Ricerche di topografia insediativa del periodo punico-romano nell'agro di Terralba, Terralba ieri & oggi 21. Aru, A. 1991. Rapporti tra suolo e paesaggi, in: A. Aru, P. Baldaccini & A. Vacca (eds), Nota illustrativa alla carta dei suoli della Sardegna, 59-62. Cagliari. Aru, A., P. Baldaccini & A. Ulzega 1975. Rapporti tra geomorfologia e pedologia nello studio di base di un piano per l'irrigazione del Campidano di Oristano (Sardegna), Memorie della Società Geologica Italiana 14, 125-138. Aru, A., P. Baldaccini, A. Vacca, G. Delogu, M.A. Dessena, S. Madrau, R.T. Melis & S. Vacca 1991. Le unità cartografiche, in: A. Aru, P. Baldaccini & A. Vacca (eds), Nota illustrativa alla carta dei suoli della Sardegna, 29-55. Cagliari. Badas, U., E. Atzeni, A. Comella & C. Lilliu 1988, Villanovaforru, in: G. Lilliu (ed.), L'antiquarium Arborense e i civici musei della provincia di Cagliari 7-24. Milano. Baffico, S. 1986. Materiale di importazione dal villaggio nuragico di Sant'Imbenia, in: G. Ugas & G. Lai (eds), Società e cultura in Sardegna nei periodi orientalizzante e arcaico. Rapporti tra Sardegna, Fenici, Etruschi e Greci (Atti del 1 convegno di studi ‘Un millennio di relazioni fra la Sardegna e i paesi del Mediterraneo’, Selargius-Cagliari 29-30 novembre, 1 dicembre 1985), 93-95. Cagliari. Baffico, S. 1991. Alghero (Sassari). Località Santa Imbenia, Bollettino di Archeologia 10, 97-100. Balmuth, M. 1986. Sardara (Cagliari). Preliminary report of excavations 1975-1978 of the Nuraghe Ortu Comidu, Notizie degli Scavi 8, 37 (1983), 353-410. Barcelò, P. 1988. Karthago und die iberische Halbinsel vor den Barkiden. Bonn. Asad, T. 1973 (ed.). Anthropology and the colonial encounter. London. Barcelò, P. 1989a. Zur karthagischen Überseepolitik im VI und V Jahrhundert v.Chr., Gymnasium 96, 13- 37. Asheri, D. 1988. Carthaginians and Greeks, in: J. Boardman, N. Hammond, D. Lewis & M. Ostwald (eds), The Cambridge Ancient History, vol IV: Persia, Greece and the western Mediterranean c. 525 to 479 BC (2nd ed.), 739-780. Cambridge. Barcelò, P. 1989b. Beobachtungen zur Entstehung der Barkidischen Herrschaft in Spanien, in: H. DeVijver & E. Lipinski (eds), Punic Wars (= Studia Phoenicia X), 167-184. Leuven. Assorgia, A., L. Beccaluva, G.M. Di Paola, L. Maccioni, G. Macciotta, M. Puxeddu, R. Santacroce & G. Venturelli 1976. Il complesso vulcanico di Monte Arci (Sardegna centro-occidentale). Nota illustrativa alla carta geopetrografica 1:50.000, Bollettino della Società Geologica Italiana 95, 371-401. Atzeni, C., L. Massidda, U. Sanna & P. Virdis 1987. Archeometallurgia nuragica nel territorio di Villanovaforru, in: G. Lilliu, G. Ugas & G. Lai (eds), La Sardegna nel Mediterraneo tra il secondo e il primo millennio a.C. (Atti del II convegno di studi ‘Un millennio di relazioni fra la Sardegna e i paesi del Mediterraneo’, Selargius-Cagliari 27-30 novembre 1986), 147-165. Cagliari. Atzori, G. 1992. Il villaggio nuragico di Sant'Elia in Santa Giusta (Oristano), in: G. Lilliu, G. Ugas & G. Lai (eds), La Sardegna nel Mediterraneo tra il Bronzo Medio ed il Bronzo Recente (XVI-XIII sec. a.C.) (Atti del III convegno di studi ‘Un millennio di relazioni fra la Sardegna e i paesi del Mediterraneo', Selargius-Cagliari 1922 novembre 1987), 127-134. Cagliari. 218 Barker, F., P. Hulme & M. Iversen 1994. Introduction, in: F. Barker, P. Hulme & M. Iversen (eds), Colonial discourse / postcolonial theory, 1-23. Manchester. Barker, G. 1995. A Mediterranean valley. Landscape archaeology and Annales history in the Biferno valley. London/New York. Barnett, R. 1987a. The excavations at Tharros, in: R. Barnett & C. Mendleson (eds), A catalogue of material in the British Museum from Phoenician and other tombs at Tharros, Sardinia, 30-37. London. Barnett, R. 1987b. The burials: a survey and analysis, in: R. Barnett & C. Mendleson (eds), A catalogue of material in the British Museum from Phoenician and other tombs at Tharros, Sardinia, 38-48. London. Barraud, C. & J. Platenkamp 1990. Rituals and the comparison of societies, in: C. Barraud & and J. Platenkamp (eds), Rituals and the socio-cosmic order in eastern Indonesian societies (part II Maluku), Bijdragen tot de taal-, land- en volkenkunde 146 (2/3), 3-126, 103123. Barraud, C., D. de Coppet, A. Iteanu & R. Jamous 1984. Des relations et des morts. Quattre sociétés vues sous l'angle des échanges, in: J. Galey (ed.), Différences valeurs hiérarchie. Textes offerts à Louis Dumont, 421-520. Paris. Barreca, F. 1970. Ricerche puniche in Sardegna, in: Ricerche puniche nel Mediterraneo centrale. (Relazioni del colloquio in Roma 5-7 maggio 1969), 21-37. Roma. Barreca, F. 1978. Le fortificazioni puniche in Sardegna, in: Atti del primo convegno italiano sul Vicino Oriente antico, 115-128. Roma. Barreca, F. 1982a. Stato attuale della ricerca sulla Sardegna feniciopunica, Archivio Storico Sardo 33, 57-71. Barreca, F. 1982b. L'insediamento punico, in: M.G. Paderi & O. Putzolu (eds), Ricerche archeologiche nel territorio di Sanluri, 45-46. Sanluri. Barreca, F. 1983. L'archeologia fenicio-punica in Sardegna. Un decennio di attività, in: Atti del I congresso internazionale di studi fenici e punici, Roma 5-10 Novembre 1979, 291-310. Roma. Barreca, F. 1986. La civiltà fenicio-punica in Sardegna (= Sardegna Archeologica. Studi e monumenti 3). Sassari. Barreca, F. 1988. Ampsicora tra storia e leggenda, in: L. Pani Ermini (ed.), Ampsicora e il territorio di Cornus (= Mediterraneo tardoantico e medievale. Scavi e ricerche 6), 25-30. Taranto. Barth, F. 1992. Towards greater naturalism in conceptualizing societies, in: A. Kuper (ed.), Conceptualizing society, 17-33. London/ New York. Bartolini, G. 1989. La cultura villanoviana. All'inizio della storia etrusca. Roma. Bartoloni, P. 1981. Contributo alla cronologia delle necropoli fenicie e puniche di Sardegna, Rivista di Studi Fenici 9 (Supplement), 22-24. Bartoloni, P. 1983. Studi sulla ceramica fenicia e punica (= Collezione di Studi Fenici 15). Roma. Bartoloni, P. 1988a. Le anfore fenicie e puniche di Sardegna (= Studia Punica 4). Roma. Bartoloni, P. 1988b. Aspetti protostorici di epoca tardopunica e romana nel Nord Africa e in Sardegna, in: A. Mastino (ed.), L'Africa Romana. Atti del 5. convegno di studio, Sassari 11-13 dicembre 1987, 345-347. Sassari. Bartoloni, P. 1995. L'insediamento fortificato di Monte Sirai, in: V. Santoni (ed.), Carbonia e il Sulcis. Archeologia e territorio, 203221. Oristano. Bartoloni, P. & C. Tronchetti 1981. La necropoli di Nora (= Collezione di Studi Fenici 12). Roma. Bartoloni, P., S.F. Bondì & L.A. Marras 1992. Monte Sirai (= Itinerari IX). Roma. Bazelmans, J. 1996. Eén voor allen, allen voor één. Tacitus' Germania, de Oudengelse Beowulf en het ritueel-kosmologische karakter van de relatie tussen heer en krijger-volgeling in Germaanse samenlevingen, Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam. Amsterdam. Beccaluva, L., L. Civetta, G. Macciotta & C.A. Ricci 1985. Geochronology in Italy: results and problems, Rendiconti della Società Italiana di Mineralogia e Petrologia 40, 57-72. Bejor, G. 1994. Romanizzazione ed evoluzione dello spazio urbano in una città punica: il caso di Nora, in: A. Mastino & P. Ruggeri (eds), L'Africa romana X. Atti del X convegno di studio, Oristano, 11-13 dicembre 1992, 843-856. Sassari. Belluomini, G., M. Branca, L. Delitalia, G. Pecorini & C. Spano 1986. Isoleucine epimerization dating of Quaternary marine deposits in Sardinia, Italy, in: A. Ozer & C. Vita-Finzi (eds), Dating Mediterranean shorelines (= Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie, Supplementband 62), 109-117. Berlin. Bénabou, M. 1976. La résistance africaine à la romanisation. Paris. Bénabou, M. 1981. L'Afrique et la culture romaine: le problème des survivances, in: Actes du IIe congrès d'histoire e de civilisation du Maghreb: dépendances, résistances et mouvements de libération au Maghreb. Les Cahiers de Tunisie 29 (17-118), 9-21. Bencivenga Trillmich, C. 1990. Elea: problems of the relationship between city and territory, and of urban organization in the archaic period, in Antiquity, in: J.-P. Descoeudres (ed.) 1990. Greek colonists and native populations (Proceedings of the first Australian congress of Classical Archaeology held in honour of Emeritus Professor A.D. Trendall, Sydney 9-14 July 1985), 469489. Canberra. Bender, B. (ed.) 1993. Landscape, politics and perspectives. Providence. Bender, B. 1993. Landscape - meaning and action, in: B. Bender (ed.), Landscape, politics and perspectives, 1-17. Providence. Berdoulay, V, 1989. Place, meaning, and discourse in French language geography, in: J. Agnew & J. Duncan (eds), The power of place. Bringing together geographical and sociological imagination, 124-139. Boston. Bartoloni, P. 1989. Sulcis (= Itinerari III). Roma. Bartoloni, P. 1990. Aspetti precoloniali della colonizzazione fenicia in occidente, Rivista di Studi Fenici 18 (2), 157-167. Bartoloni, P. 1992. L'acropoli, in: P. Bartoloni, S.F. Bondì & L.A. Marras, Monte Sirai (= Itinierari 9), 37- 45. Roma. Bernardini, P. 1986. Precolonizzazione e colonizzazione fenicia in Sardegna, Egitto e Vicino Oriente 9, 101-116. Bernardini, P. 1989. Tre nuovi documenti di importazione dalla collina di Muru Mannu (Tharros XV-XVI), Rivista di Studi Fenici 17, 285-290. 219 Bernardini, P. 1991. Un insediamento fenicio a Sulci nella seconda metà dell'VIII sec. a.C., in: Atti del II Congresso Internazionale di Studi Fenici e Punici (Roma 9-14 novembre 1987) vol. 2, 663-673. Roma. Bernardini, P. 1993a. Considerazioni sui rapporti tra la Sardegna, Cipro e l'area Egeo-orientale nell'Età del Bronzo, Quaderni della Soprintendenza Archeologica per le province di Cagliari e Oristano 10, 29-67. Bernardini, P. 1993b. La Sardegna e i Fenici. Apppunti sulla colonizzazione, Rivista di Studi Fenici 21, 29-81. Bernardini, P. 1995. Le origini di Sulcis, in Santoni, V. (ed.), Carbonia e il Sulcis. Archeologia e territorio, 191-201. Oristano. Bernardini, P. 1997. La necropologi di San Siorgio di Portoscuso, in: P.G. Spanu (ed.), Phoinikes b shrdn. I fenici in Sardegna. Nuove acquisizioni. Oristano. Bernardini, P. & G. Tore 1987. Sui materiali del tempio a pozzo di Cuccuru Nuraxi di Settimo San Pietro (Cagliari), in: G. Lilliu, G. Ugas & G. Lai (eds), La Sardegna nel Mediterraneo tra il secondo e il primo millennio a.C. (Atti del II convegno di studi ‘Un millennio di relazioni fra la Sardegna e i paesi del Mediterraneo’, Selargius-Cagliari 27-30 novembre 1986), 299-312. Cagliari. Bernardini, P. & C. Tronchetti 1990a. L'effigie, in: La civiltà nuragica, 211-228. Milano. Bernardini, P. & C. Tronchetti 1990b. La Sardegna, gli etruschi e i greci, in: La civiltà nuragica, 264-282. Milano. Bhabha, H. 1985. Signs taken for wonders: questions of ambivalence and authority under a tree outside Dehli, May 1817, in: H. Bhabha 1994, The location of culture, 102-122. London. Bhabha, H. 1987. Of mimicry and men: the ambivalence of colonial discourse, in: H. Bhabha 1994, The location of culture, 85-92. London. Bhabha, H. 1992a. The postcolonial and the postmodern: the question of agency, in: H. Bhabha 1994, The location of culture, 171197. London. Boardman, J. 1980. The Greeks overseas: their early colonies and trade (3rd ed.). London. Bondì, S. F. 1979. Per una riconsiderazione del tofet, Egitto e Vicino Oriente 2, 139-150. Bondì, S.F. 1987a. La colonizzazione fenicia, in: M. Guidetti (ed.), Dalle origini alla fine dell'età bizantina (= Storia dei Sardi e della Sardegna 1), 147-171. Milano Bondì, S.F. 1987b. La dominazione cartaginese, in: M. Guidetti (ed.), Dalle origini alla fine dell'età bizantina (= Storia dei Sardi e della Sardegna 1), 173-203. Milano. Bondì, S.F. 1987c. Le sopravvivenze puniche della Sardegna romana, in: M. Guidetti (ed.), Dalle origini alla fine dell'età bizantina (= Storia dei Sardi e della Sardegna 1), 205-211. Milano. Bondì, S.F. 1988. Problemi della precolonizzazione fenicia nel Mediterraneo centro-occidentale, in: E. Acquaro, L. Godart, F. Mazza & D. Musti (eds), Momenti precoloniali nel Mediterraneo antico. Questioni di metodo – Aree d'indagine – Evidenze a confronto, 243-255. Roma. Bondì, S.F. 1990. La cultura punica nella Sardegna romana: un fenomeno di sopravvivenza?, in: A. Mastino (ed.), L'Africa romana 7 (Atti del convegno di studio, Sassari 15-17 dicembre 1989), 457464. Sassari. Bondì, S.F. 1995a. Les institutions, l'organisation politique et administrative in: V. Krings, La civilisation phénicienne et punique. Manuel de recherche, 290- 302. Leiden. Bondì, S.F. 1995b. La société, in: V. Krings, La civilisation phénicienne et punique. Manuel de recherche, 345-353. Leiden. Bondì, S.F. 1995c. Il tofet di Monte Sirai, in: V. Santoni (ed.), Carbonia e il Sulcis. Archeologia e territorio, 223-238. Oristano. Botto, M. 1986. I commerci fenici e la Sardegna nella fase precoloniale, Egitto e Vicino Oriente 9, 125-149. Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge. Bourdieu, P. 1990. The logic of practice. Cambridge. Bhabha, H. 1992b. The other question: Stereotype, discrimination and the discourse of colonialism, in: H. Bhabha 1994, The location of culture, 66-84. London. Bintliff, J. 1991. The contribution of an Annaliste / structural history approach to archaeology, in: J. Bintliff (ed.), The Annales school and archaeology, 1- 33. London/New York. Bourdieu, P. & L. Wacquant 1992. De doelstellingen van een reflexieve maatschappijwetenschap, in: P. Bourdieu & L. Wacquant (eds), Argumenten. Voor een reflexieve maatschappijwetenschap, 35-149. Amsterdam. Brandt, R. & J. Slofstra (eds) 1983. Roman and native in the Low Countries (= BAR Int.Ser. 184). Oxford. Bisi, A.M. 1970. Ceramica punica. Aspetti e problemi. Napoli. Blázquez, J.M. 1991. Panorama general del desarrollo histórico de la cultura tartésica desde finales de Edad del Bronce, s. VIII a.C., hasta los orígines de las culturas turdetana e ibérica. Los influjos fenicios, Rivista di Studi Fenici 19, 33-48. Blázquez-Martinez, J.M., M. García & G. Pérez 1991. Los Bárquidas en la península Ibérica, in: Atti del II Congresso Internazionale di Studi Fenici e Punici (Roma 9-14 novembre 1987), 27-50. Roma. 220 Braudel, F. 1972. The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean world in the age of Philip II. London. Brigaglia, M. 1987. La geografia nella storia della Sardegna, in: M. Guidetti (ed.), Dalle origini alla fine dell’età biznatine, Storia dei Sardi e della Sardegna 1, 1-39. Milano. Briscoe, J. 1989. The second Punic War, in: A. Astin, F. Walbank, M. Frederiksen & R. Ogilvie (eds), Rome and the Mediterranean to 133 BC (2nd ed.) (= Cambridge Ancient History 8), 44-80. Cambridge. D.R. Keller & D.W. Rupp (eds), Archaeological survey in the Mediterranean area (= BAR Int.Ser. 155), 375-416. Oxford. Broughton, T. 1929. The romanization of Africa Proconsularis (= The Johns Hopkins University Studies in historical and political science. Extra volumes, New Series 5) Diss. Johns Hopkins University. Baltimore. Chessa, I. 1988. Anfore fenicie da Nora, Quaderni della Soprintendenza archeologica per le province di Cagliari e Oristano 5, 91-96. Brown, P. 1984. Malaria in Nuragic, Punic and Roman Sardinia: some hypotheses, in: M. Balmuth & R. Rowland (eds), Studies in Sardinian archaeology, 209-235. Ann Arbor. Cirese, A. 1969. Concezioni del mondo, filosofia spontanea e istinto di classe nelle Osservazioni sul folclore di Antonio Gramsci, in: A. Cirese 1976, Intellettuali, folklore, istituto di classe. Note su Verga, Deledda, Scotellaro, Gramsci, 66-120. Torino. Brown, M. 1996. On resisting resistance, American Anthropologist 98, 729-749. Brückner, H. 1986. Stratigraphy, evolution and age of Quaternary marine terraces in Morocco and Spain, in: A. Ozer & C. Vita-Finzi (eds), Dating Mediterranean shorelines (= Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie, Supplementband 62), 83-101. Berlin. Brunt, P. 1965. Reflections on British and Roman imperialism, Comparative Studies in Society and History 7, 267-288. Bunnens, G. 1979. L'expansion phénicienne en Méditerranée. Essai d'interprétation fondé sur une analyse des traditions littéraires. Bruxelles. Bunnens, G. 1983. La distinction entre Phéniciens et Puniques chez les auteurs classiques, in: Atti del I congresso internazionale di studi fenici e punici, Roma 5-10 Novembre 1979, 233-238. Roma. Cagnat, R. 1913. L'armée romaine de l'Afrique. Paris. Carandini, A. & S. Settis 1979. Schiavi e padroni nell'Etruria romana. Roma. Carboni, S., L. Lecca & C. Ferrara 1989. La discordanza versiliana sulla piattaforma continentale occidentale della Sardegna, Bollettino della Società Geologica Italiana 108, 503-519. Cintas, P. 1950. Céramique punique. Paris. Clark, M. 1996. Sardinia: cheese and modernization, in: C. Levy (ed.), Italian regionalism. History, identity and politics, 81-106. Oxford. Clarke, D. 1973. Archaeology: the loss of innocence, Antiquity 47, 6-18. Clifford, J. 1980. On Orientalism, in: J. Clifford 1989, The predicament of culture. Twentieth-century ethnography, literature and art, Cambridge (MA), 255-276. Cocozza, T. & K. Schäfer 1974. Cenozoic graben tectonics in Sardinia, in: A. Cherchi Pomesano (ed.), Paleogeografia del Terziario sardo nell'ambito del Mediterraneo occidentale (Cagliari 23-27 iuglio 1973), 146-162. Bologna. Cocozza, T., A. Jacobacci, R. Nardi & I. Salvadori 1974. Schema stratigrafico-strutturale del Massiccio Sardo-Corso e minerogenesi della Sardegna, Memorie della Società Geologica Italiana 13, 85186. Cohn, B. 1983. Representing authority in Victorian India, in: E. Hobsbawm & T. Ranger (eds), The invention of tradition, 165209. Cambridge. Colonna, G. 1983. Risposta a Guidi, in: C. Ampolo (ed.), Sulla formazione della città di Roma, OPVS. Rivista internazionale di storia economica e sociale dell'antichità 2, 425-448. Carrié, J.-M., J. Deneauve, P. Gros, S. Lancel, N. Sanviti, J.-P. Thuiller & F. Villedieu 1979. Byrsa 1. Mission archéologique française à Carthage. Rapports prélimiaires des fouilles (1974-1976) (= Collection del'Ecole Française de Rome 41). Roma. Comaroff, J. 1985. Body of power, spirit of resistance. The culture and history of a South African people. Chicago. Carta Storica del territorio di Gùspini 1995. Gùspini. Comaroff, J. 1989. Images of empire, contests of conscience: models of colonial domination in South Africa, American Ethnologist 16, 661-685. Castia, S. (ed.) 1996. La Sardegna e i miti classici: tradizioni mitografiche e leggende (Catalogo della mostra fotografica e multimediale, Olbia, Bibliotheca Simpliciana 13). Sassari. Celuzza, M.G. & E. Regoli 1982. La valle d'Oro nel territorio di Cosa. Ager Cosanus e ager Veientanus a confronto, Dialoghi di Archeologia 4, 31-62. Comaroff, J. & J. Comaroff 1989. The colonization of consciousness in South Africa, Economy and Society 18, 267-296. Comaroff, J. & J. Comaroff 1991. Of revelation and revolution: christianity, colonialism and consciousness in South Africa. Chicago. Contu, E. 1958. Argomenti di cronologia a proposito delle tombe a poliandro di Ena'e Muros e Motrox'e Bois (Usellus, CA), Studi Sardi 14-15 (1955-1957), 181-196. Cherchi, A., A. Marini, M. Murru & A. Ulzega 1978. Lineamenti neotettonici nella Sardegna meridionale, Memorie della Società Geologica Italiana 19, 581- 587. (= Istituto di Geologia e Paleontologia, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, Pubblicazione n. 183) Cooper, F. & A. Stoler 1989. Tensions of empire: colonial control and visions of rule, American Ethnologist 16, 609-621. Cherry, J.F. 1983. Frogs around the pond: perspectives on current archaeological survey projects in the Mediterranean region, in Corbey, R. 1989. Wildheid en beschaving. De Europese verbeelding van Afrika. Baarn. 221 Cornell, T. 1995. The beginnings of Rome. Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000-264 BC). London. Dougherty, C. 1993. The poetics of colonization. From city to text in archaic Greece. New York. Costa Ribas, B., J. Fernández Gómez & L. Gómez Bellard 1991, Ibiza fenicia: la primera fase de la colonización de la isla (siglas VII y VI a.C.) in: Atti del II Congresso Internazionale di Studi Fenici e Punici (Roma 9-14 novembre 1987) 2, 759-795. Roma. Doyle, M. 1986. Empires. Ithaca. Costa, A.M. & E. Usai 1990. Santu Teru - Monte Luna, in: D. Salvi & L.A. Usai (eds) 1990, Museo Sa Domu Nosta, 39-73. Cagliari. Dunbabin, T. 1948. The western Greeks. The history of Sicily and South Italy from the foundation of the Greek colonies to 480 BC. Oxford. de Coppet, D. 1985. ... land owns people, in: R. Barnes, D. de Coppet & R. Parkin (eds), Contexts and levels. Anthropological essays in hierarchy, (= JASO Occasional papers 4), 78-90. Oxford. de Coppet, D. 1992. Comparison, a universal for anthropology: from ‘re-presentation' to the comparison of hierarchies of values, in: A. Kuper (ed.), Conceptualizing society, 59-74. London/New York. Delano Smith, C. 1978. Coastal sedimentation, lagoons and ports in Italy, in: H. Blake, T. Potter & D. Whitehouse (eds), Papers in Italian archaeology: the Lancaster seminar (= BAR Int.Ser. 41) I, 25-33. Oxford. Descoeudres, J.-P. (ed.) 1990a. Greek colonists and native populations (Proceedings of the first Australian congress of Classical Archaeology held in honour of Emeritus Professor A.D. Trendall, Sydney 9-14 July 1985). Canberra. Descoeudres, J.-P. 1990b. Introduction, in: J.-P. Descoeudres (ed.), Greek colonists and native populations (Proceedings of the first Australian congress of Classical Archaeology held in honour of Emeritus Professor A.D. Trendall, Sydney 9-14 July 1985), 1-12. Canberra. Develin, R. 1994. Introduction, in: J. Yardley & R. Develin (eds), Justin. Epitome of the Philippic History of Pompeius Trogus (= American Philological Association Classical Resources 3), 1-11. Atlanta. di Gregorio, F. 1977. Studio geomorfologico del Golfo di Oristano, Bollettino della Società Sarda di Scienze Naturali 16, 113-122. di Gregorio, F. & A. Marini 1987. Facies ambientali da Landsat nel Campidano di Oristano (Sardegna centro-occidentale), Geografia Fisica e Dinamica Quaternaria 10, 175-179. Dreyfus, H. & P. Rabinow 1982. Michel Foucault. Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. New York. Dunbabin, T. 1957. The Greeks and their eastern neighbours: studies in the relations between Greece and the countries of the Near East in the eight and seventh centuries B.C. (= Supplementary paper of the Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 8). London. Dyson, S. 1975. Native revolt patterns in the Roman Empire, in: H. Temporini & W. Hase (eds), Aufstieg und Niedergang in der Römischen Welt 2 (3), 138- 175. Berlin. Dyson, S. 1985. The creation of the Roman frontier. Princeton. Dyson, S. & R. Rowland 1992a. Survey and settlement reconstruction in west-central Sardinia, Quaderni della Soprintendenza per le province di Cagliari e Oristano 9, 177-195. Dyson, S. & R. Rowland 1992b. Survey and settlement reconstruction in west-central Sardinia, American Journal of Archaeology 96, 203-224. Fabian, J. 1983. Time and the Other. How anthropology makes its object. New York. Fabian, J. 1986. Language and colonial power. The appropriation of Swahili in the former Belgia Congo, 1880-1938. Cambridge. Fabian, J. 1990. Religious and secular colonization: common ground, History and Anthropology 4, 339- 355. Falsone, G. 1995. Sicile, in: V. Krings (ed.), La civilisation phénicienne et punique. Manuel de recherche (= Handbuch der Orientalistik 1, 20), 674- 697. Leiden. Fanari, F. 1989. L'antico porto di Neapolis Santa Maria di Nabui – Guspini (CA), Quaderni della soprintendenza archeologica per le province di Cagliari e Oristano 6, 125-138. Dietler, M. 1990. Driven by drink: the role of drinking in the political economy and the case of early Iron Age France, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 9, 352-406. Fanon, F. 1967. The wretched of the earth. Harmondsworth. Dirks, N. 1992. Introduction: colonialism and culture, in: N. Dirks (ed.). Colonialism and culture, 1-25. Ann Arbor. Fanucci, F., G. Fierro, A. Ulzega, M. Gennesseaux, J.-P. Rehault & L. Viaris de Lesegno 1976. The continental shelf of Sardinia: structure and sedimentary characteristics, Bollettino della Società Geologica Italiana 95, 1201-1217. Docter, R. & H.-G. Niemeyer 1994. Pithekoussai: the Carthaginian connection on the archaeological evidence of Euboeo-Phoenician partnership in the 8th and 7th centuries B.C., in: APOIKIA. Scritti in onore di Giorgio Buchner (= Annali di Archeologia e Storia Antica, n.s. 1), 10-115. Napoli. Dondin-Payre, M. 1991. L'exercitus Africae inspiratrice de l'armée française d'Afrique: ense et aratro, Antiquités Africaines 27, 141-149. 222 Febvre, L. 1949. A new kind of history, in: P. Burke (ed.), A new kind of history, from the writings of Lucien Febre, 27-43. London. Femia, J. 1975 Hegemony and consciousness in the thought of Antonio Gramsci, Political Studies 23, 29- 48. Fentress, E. 1983. Forever Berber?, OPVS 2, 161- 175. Ferrarese Ceruti, M.L. 1987. Considerazioni sulla ceramica nuragica a Lipari, in: G. Lilliu, G. Ugas & G. Lai (eds), La Sardegna nel Mediterraneo tra il secondo e il primo millennio a.C. (= Atti del II convegno di studi ‘Un millennio di relazioni fra la Sardegna e i paesi del Mediterraneo’, Selargius-Cagliari 27-30 novembre 1986), 431-442. Cagliari. Ferro, M. 1994. Histoire des colonisations. Des conquêtes aux indépendences XIIIe-XXe siècle. Paris. Finley, M. 1977. The ancient city: from Fustel de Coulanges to Max Weber and beyond, in M. Finley (1981), Economy and society in ancient Greece, 3- 23. New York. Fiori, G. 1966. Vita di Antonio Gramsci. Roma. Flemming, N. 1969. Archaeological evidence for eustatic change of sea level and earth movements in the western Mediterranean during the last 2,000 years (= The Geological Society of America Special Paper 109). Boulder (Colorado). Foucault, M. 1971. Nietzsche, genealogy, history, in: D. Bouchard (ed.), Michel Foucault: language, counter-memory, practice: selected essays and interviews, 139-164. New York. (eds), Global modernities (Theory, Culture and Society series), 6990. London. Gallini, C. 1973. Cosa intendere per ellenizzazione. Problemi di metodo, Dialoghi di Archeologia 7, 175- 191. Garbini, G. 1983. Considerazioni conclusive, in: Fenici e Arabi nel Mediterraneo, 158-161. Roma. Garnsey, P. & C. Whittaker (eds) 1978. Imperialism in the ancient world. Cambridge. Gates, H.L. Jr. 1991. Critical Fanonism, Critical Inquiry 17, 457-470. Gerratana, V. (ed.) 1975. Antonio Gramsci. Quaderni del carcere. Edizione critica dell'Istituto Gramsci. Torino. Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society. London. Giorgetti, S. 1982. Area culturale annessa al tempio a pozzo, in: V. Santoni (ed.), Cabras-Cuccuru S'Arriu. Nota preliminare di scavo (1978, 1979, 1980), Rivista di Studi Fenici 10, 103-127 (Tharros VIII), 113-115. Giuntoli, S. 1993. Museo archeologico. Massa Marittima. Firenze. Foucault, M. 1982. Afterword: the subject and power, in: H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow, Michel Foucault. Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, 208-226. New York. Frankenstein, S. 1979. The Phoenicians in the Far West: a function of Neo-Assyrian imperialism, in: M. Trolle Larsen (ed.), Power and propaganda. A symposium on ancient empires (= Mesopotamia 7), 263-294. Copenhagen. Frau, B. 1985. From the Etruscan ports of Graviscae and Martanum: elements for a new methodology in the field of maritime archaeological research, in: A. Raban (ed.), Harbour archaeology (Proceedings of the first international workshop on ancient mediterranean harbours, Caesarea Marittima 24-28.6.83) (= BAR Int.Ser. 257), 93-104. Oxford. Freeman, P. 1993. “Romanisation" and Roman material culture, Journal of Roman Archaeology 6, 438-454. Freeman, P. 1997. Mommsen through to Haverfield: the origins of Romanization studies in late 19th-c. Britain, in: D. Mattingly (ed.), Dialogues in imperialism. Power, discourse, and discrepant experience in the Roman Empire (= Journal of Roman Archaeology supplementary series 23), 27-50. Ann Arbor. Friedman, J. 1990. Notes on culture and identity in imperial worlds, in: P. Bilde, T. Engberg-Pedersen, L. Hannestad & J. Zahle (eds), Religion and religious practice in the Seleucid Kingdom, 14-39. Aarhus. Gómez Bellard, C. 1986. Asentamientos rurales en la Ibiza púnica, in: M.E. Aubet & G. del Olmo (eds), Los fenicios en la penísula Ibérica (= Aula Orientalis 3, 1985), 177-192. Sabadell. Gómez Bellard, C. 1989. L'île d'Ibiza à l'époque des Guerres Puniques, in: H. DeVijver & E. Lipinski (eds), Punic Wars (= Studia Phoenicia X), 85-97. Leuven. Gómez Bellard, C. in press. Avance del estudio de un paesaje rural púnico y romano: Es Cubells-Cala d'Hort (Ibiza), in: Atti del IV Congresso Internazionale di Studi Fenici e Punici (Cadiz 26 ottobre 1995). Goudie, A. 1987. Geography and archaeology: the growth of a relationship, in: M. Wagstaff (ed.), Landscape and culture. Geographical and archaeological perspectives, 11-36. Oxford. Gras, M. 1985. Trafics Tyrrhéniens archaïques (= Bibliothèques des écoles françaises d'Athènes et de Rome 258). Roma. Gras, M., P. Rouillard & J. Teixidor 1991. The Phoenicians and death, Berytus 39, 127-176. Gruen, S. 1984. Material rewards and the drive for empire, in: W. Harris (ed.), The imperialism of Mid- Republican Rome (= Papers and monographs of the American Academy in Rome 19), 59-82. Roma. Gruppi, L. 1972. Il concetto di egemonia in Gramsci. Roma. Friedman, J. 1992a. The past in the future: history and the politics of identity, American Anthropologist 94, 837-859. Friedman, J. 1992b. General historical and culturally specific properties of global systems, Review 15, 335-372. Friedman, J. 1995, Global system, globalization and the parameters of modernization, in: M. Featherstone, S. Lash & R. Robertson Gsell, S. 1921. Histoire ancienne de l'Afrique du Nord (2nd ed.). Paris. Guerrero Ayuso, V. 1991. Naturaleza y función de los asientamentos púnicos en Mallorca, in: Atti del II Congresso Internazionale di Studi Fenici e Punici (Roma 9-14 novembre 1987), 923-930. Roma. 223 Guha, R. 1982. On some aspects of the historiography of colonial India, in: R. Guha (ed.), Subaltern Studies I, 1-8. Dehli. Herzfeld, M. 1996. Monumental indifference?, Archaeological Dialogues 3, 120-123. Guidi, A. 1982. Sulle prime fasi dell'urbanizzazione nel Lazio protostorico, OPVS. Rivista internazionale di storia economica e sociale dell'antichità 1, 279- 289. Higgs, E. & M. Jarmann 1975. Palaeoeconomy, in: E. Higgs (ed.), Palaeoeconomy, 1-7. Cambridge. Guidi, A. 1988. Storia della paletnologia (Biblioteca Universale Laterza 244). Roma. Guido, F. 1991. Scavi nella fortezza punica di S. Antine di Genoni (Nuoro), in: Atti del II Congresso Internazionale di Studi Fenici e Punici (Roma 9-14 novembre 1987), 931-940. Roma. Guido, F. 1993. Monete, in: G. Lilliu, C. Campus, F. Guido, O. Fonzo & J.-D. Vigne, Genna Maria II,1: il deposito votivo del mastio e del cortile, 125-159. Cagliari. Günther, L.M. 1995. L'aristocratie des grands négociants à Carthage et sa politique d'outre-mer aux VIe et Ve siècles av. J.-C., in: M.H. Fantar & M. Ghaki (eds), Actes du IIIe congrès international des études phéniciennes et puniques, Tunis 11-16 novembre 1991, 2, 128-132. Tunis. Hannerz, U. 1987. The world in creolisation, Africa 57, 546-559. Hannerz, U. 1992. The global ecumene as a network of networks, in: A. Kuper (ed.), Conceptualizing Society, 34-56. London/New York. Hingley, R. 1996. The ‘legacy' of Rome: the rise, decline and fall of the theory of romanization, in: J. Webster & N. Cooper (eds), Roman imperialism: post-colonial perspectives (= Leicester Archaeology Monographs 3), 35-48. Leicester. Hirsch, E. 1995. Introduction. Landscape between place and space, in: E. Hirsch & M. O'Hanlon (eds), The anthropology of landscape. Perspectives on place and space, 1-30. Oxford. Hoare, Q. & G. Novell Smith (eds) 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London. Hodder, I. 1982. Symbols in action. Cambridge. Horvath, R. 1972. A definition of colonialism, Current anthropology 13, 45-87. Huß, W. 1988. Der iustinische Malchus – eine Ausgeburt der Phantasie?, Latomus 47, 53-59. Hannerz, U. 1994. Sophiatown: the view from afar, Journal of southern African studies 20, 181-193. Isserlin, B. 1982. Motya: urban features, in: H.-G. Niemeyer (ed.), Phönizer im Westen. Die Beiträge des Internazionalen Symposium über ‘die Phönizische Expansion im westlichen Mittelmeerraum’, Köln 24. bis 27. April 1979 (= Madrider Beiträge 8), 113-131. Mainz am Rhein. Hans, L.M. 1983. Karthago und Sizilien (= Historische Texte und Studien 7). Hildesheim. Jackson Lears, T. 1985. The concept of cultural hegemony: problems and possibilities, The American Historical Review 90, 567-593. Hans, L.M. 1985. Zur Rolle Sardiniens in der karthagischen Handelspolitik im 4. Jh. v. Chr., Münsterische Beiträge zur antiken Handelsgeschichte 4.2, 65-76. Jones, S. 1997. The archaeology of ethnicity. Constructing identities in the past and present. London. Harris, W. 1979. War and imperialism in Republican Rome 32770 BC. Oxford. Harris, W. 1984. Current directions in the study of Roman imperialism, in: W. Harris (ed.), The imperialism of Mid-Republican Rome (= Papers and monographs of the American Academy in Rome 19), 13-34. Roma. Harris, W. 1989. Roman expansion in the West, in: A. Astin, F. Walbank, M. Frederiksen & R. Ogilvie (eds), Rome and the Mediterranean to 133 BC (2nd ed.) (= Cambridge Ancient History 8), 107-162. Cambridge. Hayes, P. 1991. Models for the distribution of pottery around former agricultural settlements, in: A. Schofield (ed.), Interpreting artefact scatters: contributions to ploughzone archaeology, 81-92. Oxford. Haynes, D. & G. Prakash 1991. Introduction: the entanglement of power and resistance, in: D. Haynes & G. Prakash (eds), Contesting power: resistance and everyday social relations in South Asia, 1-22. Berkeley. Herzfeld, M. 1987. Anthropology through the looking-glass. Critical ethnography in the margins of Europe. Cambridge. 224 Kearney, M. 1996. Reconceptualizing the peasantry. Anthropology in global perspective (Critical essays in anthropology). Boulder. Keesing, R. 1989. Creating the past: custom and identity in the contemporary Pacific, The contemporary Pacific 1, 19-42. Keesing, R. 1992. Custom and confrontation. The Kwaio struggle for cultural autonomy. Chicago. Keesing, R. 1994. Colonial and counter-colonial discourse in Melanesia, Critique of Anthropology 14, 41-58. Kellner, D. 1992. Popular culture and the construction of postmodern identities, in: S. Lash & J. Friedman (eds), Modernity and identity, 141-177. Oxford. Kimmig, W. 1983. Die griechische Kolonisation im westlichen Mittelmeergebiet und ihre Wirkung auf die Landschaften des westlichen Mitteleuropa, Jahrbuch des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums Mainz 30, 3-78. Koberstein, A. 1993. Die Fundlandschaft Guspini, Provinz Cagliari, Sardinien. Archäologische Studien in Südwestsardinien mit einer Einführung zur sardischen Vorgeschichte (= Deutsche Hochschulschriften 704), Ph.D. thesis, University of Freiburg. Köln. Kuper, A. (ed.) 1992. Conceptualizing society. London/New York. Lilliu, G. 1966. Sculture della Sardegna nuragica. Verona. Kurtz, D. 1996. Hegemony and anthropology. Gramsci, exegeses, reinterpretations, Critique of Anthropology 16, 103-135. Lilliu, G. 1975. Antichità nuragiche nella diocesi di Ales, in: La diocesi di Ales-Usellus-Terralba. Aspetti e valori, 133-164. Cagliari. Lai, F. 1994. La giara degli uomini. Spazio e mutamento sociale nella Sardegna contemporanea (= Istituto sardo per la resistenza e dell'autonomia. Storia locale 3). Cagliari. Lilliu, G. 1981. La preistoria sarda e la civiltà nuragica nella storiografia moderna, in: Ichnussa. La Sardegna dalle origini all'etàclassica (Antica Madre, collana di studi sull'Italia antica), 487-523. Milano. Lancel, S. 1995. Carthage. A history. Oxford. Lilliu, G. 1986. Società ed economia nei centri nuragici, in: G. Ugas & G. Lai (eds), Società e cultura in Sardegna nei periodi orientalizzante e arcaico. Rapporti tra Sardegna, Fenici, Etruschi e Greci (Atti del 1 convegno di studi ‘Un millennio di relazioni fra la Sardegna e i paesi del Mediterraneo’, Selargius-Cagliari 29-30 novembre, 1 dicembre 1985), 77-87. Cagliari. Lancel, S., J.P. Morel & J.P. Thuiller 1982. Byrsa 2. Mission archéologique française à Carthage. Rapports prélimiaires des fouilles 1977-1978: niveaux et vestiges puniques) (= Collection de l'Ecole Française de Rome 41). Roma. Laroui, A. 1970. L'histoire du Maghreb: un essai de synthèse. Paris. Lilliu, G. 1987. La crescita delle aristocrazie: l'età del Ferro, in: M. Guidetti (ed.), Dalle origini alla fine dell'età bizantina (= Storia dei Sardi e della Sardegna 1), 111-127. Milano. Lawrence, D.H. 1921. Sea and Sardinia. New York. Lazenby, J. 1996. The first Punic War. London. Le Lannou, M. 1979. Pastori e contadini di Sardegna. Cagliari. Lemaire, T. 1997. Archaeology between the invention and destruction of landscape, Archaeological Dialogues 4, 5-38. Leveau, Ph., P. Sillières & J.-P. Vallat 1993. Campagnes de la Méditeranée romaine (Bibliothèque d'Archéologie). Paris. Lewthwaite, J. 1990. La strada del molo di Cagliari: l'esperienza di un archeologo di due estati in Sardegna (1976/77), Quaderni Bolotanesi 16, 83-103. Lilliu, C. (ed.) 1985. Territorio di Gesturi. Censimento archeologico. Cagliari. Lilliu, C. 1985. Introduzione: il territorio. La storia degli studi, delle scoperte e degli scavi, in: C. Lilliu (ed.), Territorio di Gesturi. Censimento archeologico, 13-17. Cagliari Lilliu, C. 1993. Un culto di età punico-romana al nuraghe Genna Maria di Villanovaforru, in: C. Lilliu, C. Campus, F. Guido, O. Fonzo & J.-D. Vigne, Genna Maria II,1: il deposito votivo del mastio e del cortile, 11-39. Cagliari. Lilliu, G. 1944. Rapporti fra la civiltà nuragica e la civiltà feniciopunica in Sardegna, Studi Etruschi 18, 323-370. Lilliu, G. 1946. Barumini (Cagliari). Saggi stratigrafici presso i nuraghi di Su Nuraxi e Marfudi; ‘vicus' di S. Lussorio e necropoli romana di Su Luargi, Notizie degli Scavi di Antichità 7.7, 175-207. Lilliu, G. 1950. Scoperte e scavi di antichità fattisi in Sardegna durante gli anni 1948 e 1949, Studi Sardi 9, 394-561. Lilliu, G. 1953. Bronzetti nuragici da Terralba (Cagliari), Annali delle facoltà di lettere, filosofia e di magistero dell'Università di Cagliari 21, 3-94. Lilliu, G. 1962. Storiografia nuragica dal XVI secolo al 1840, Archivio Storico Sardo 28, 268-279. Lilliu, G. 1988. La civiltà dei Sardi dal Paleolitico all'età dei nuraghi (3rd ed.). Torino. Lilliu, G. 1990. Sopravvivenze nuragiche in età romana, in: A. Mastino (ed.), L'Africa romana 7 (Atti del convegno di studio, Sassari 15-17 dicembre 1989), 415-446. Sassari. Lilliu, G. 1992. Ancora una riflessione sulle guerre cartaginesi per la conquista della Sardegna, Rendiconti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Classe di Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche 9 (3), 17-35. Lilliu, G. & R. Zucca 1988. Su Nuraxi di Barumini (= Sardegna Archeologica: guide e itinerari 9). Sassari. Linderski, J. 1984. Si vis pacem, para bellum. Concepts of defensive imperialism, in: W. Harris (ed.), The imperialism of Mid-Republican Rome (= Papers and monographs of the American Academy in Rome 19), 133-164. Roma. Liverani, M. 1996. The bathwater and the baby, in: M. Lefkowitz & G. Maclean Rogers (eds), Black Athena revisited, 421-427. Chapel Hill. Lo Schiavo, F. 1978. Le fibule della Sardegna, Studi Etruschi 46, 25-46. Lo Schiavo, F. 1983. Un bronzetto di Galtellì, in: Atti del I congresso internazionale di studi fenici e punici, Roma 5-10 Novembre 1979 2, 463-469. Roma. Lo Schiavo, F. & R. D'Oriano 1990. La Sardegna sulle rotte dell'Occidente, in: La Magna Grecia e il lontano Occidente (Atti del 29o convegno di studi sulla Magna Grecia, Taranto 6-11 ottobre 1989), 99-161. Lo Schiavo, F. & M. Sanges 1994, Il nuraghe Arrubiu di Orroli (= Sardegna Archeologica. Guide e itinerari 22). Sassari. Lo Schiavo, F. & D. Ridgway 1987. La Sardegna e il Mediterraneo occidentale allo scorcio del II millennio, in: G. Lilliu, G. Ugas & G. Lai (eds), La Sardegna nel Mediterraneo tra il secondo e il primo millennio a.C. (Atti del II convegno di studi ‘Un millennio di 225 relazioni fra la Sardegna e i paesi del Mediterraneo’, SelargiusCagliari 27-30 novembre 1986), 391-418. Cagliari. (Atti del convegno di studio, Sassari 14-16 dicembre 1984), 27-92. Sassari. Lo Schiavo, F. & L.A. Usai 1995. Testimonianze cultuali di età nuragica: la grotta Pirosu in località su Benatzu di Santadi, in: V. Santoni (ed.), Carbonia e il Sulcis. Archeologia e territorio, 145186. Oristano. Mastino, A. 1992. Analfabetismo e resistenza alla romanizzazione nella Barbaria sarda (I-IV secolo d.C.), inaugural lecture of the 430th academic year at Sassari University. Sassari. Lomas, K. 1993. Rome and the western Greeks, 350 BC-200 AD. Conquest and acculturation in southern Italy. London. Mastino, A. 1995. Le relazioni tra Africa e Sardegna in età romana, Archivio Storico Sardo 38, 11-82. Mattingly, D. 1995. Tripolitania. London. Lombardi Satriani, L. 1974. Antropologia culturale e analisi della cultura subalterna, in: R. Rauty (ed.), Cultura popolare e Marxismo, 211-226. Roma. López Castro, J. 1991. Cartago y la Península Ibérica: imperialismo o hegemonía?, in: La caída de Tiro y el auge de Cartago (V Jornadas de arqueología fenicio-púnica, Ibiza 1990), 73-86. Ibiza. López Castro, J. 1992. Los Libiofenicios: una colonización agrícola cartaginesa en el sur de la Península Ibérica, Rivista di Studi Fenici 20, 47-65. Lund, J. 1988. Two late Punic amphora stamps from the Danish excavations at Carthage, in: E. Lipinski (ed.), Carthage. Acta colloquii Bruxelensis habiti diebus 2 et 3 mensis Maii anni 1986 (= Studia Phoenicica 6), 101-112. Leuven. Malkin, I. 1987. Religion and colonization in ancient Greece (= Studies in Graeco-Roman religion 3). Leiden. Mattingly, D. 1996. From one imperialism to another. Imperialism in the Maghreb, in: J. Webster & N. Cooper (eds), Roman imperialism: post-colonial perspectives (= Leicester archaeological monographs 3), 49-69. Leicester. Mattingly, D. & B. Hitchner 1995. Roman Africa: an archaeological review, Journal of Roman Studies 85, 165-213. Mattone, A. 1984. L'uomo e l'ambiente, in: A. Ferrari-Bravo (ed.), Sardegna. Guida d'Italia del Touring Club Italiano, 22-37. Milano. Mauss, M. 1990. The gift. The form and reason for exchanges in archaic societies. London. Mazza, F. 1988. La ‘precolonizzazione’ fenicia: problemi storici e questioni metodologiche, in: E. Acquaro, L. Godart, F. Mazza & D. Musti (eds), Momenti precoloniali nel Mediterraneo antico. Questioni di metodo - Aree d'indagine - Evidenze a confronto, 191203. Roma. Manacorda, D. 1982. Aspetti dell'archeologia italiana durante il fascismo. A proposito di Mussoloni urbanista, Dialoghi di Archeologia n.s. 4, 89-96. Meinig, D. 1979. Introduction, in: D. Meinig (ed.), The interpretation of ordinary landscapes. Geographical essays, 1-7. New York. Mancosu, F. 1968. Recenti insediamenti rurali sorti in Sardegna, Studi Sardi 20 (1966-1967), 455-571. Meloni, P. 1949. Sei anni di lotte di Sardi e Corsi contro i Romani (236-231 a.C.), Studi Sardi 9, 121- 141. Manfredi, L.-I. 1991. Repertorio decorativo dei bacini punici di Tharros. Campagne 1988-1990 (Tharros XVII), Rivista di Studi Fenici 19, 191-213. Meloni, P. 1982. Stato attuale della ricerca sulla Sardegna romana, Archivio Storico Sardo 33, 73-90. Manfredi, L.-I. 1993. La coltura dei cereali in età punica in Sardegna e Nord-Africa, Quaderni della soprintendenza archeologica per le province di Cagliari e Oristano 10, 191-218. Marcus, G. 1992. Past, present and emergent identities: requirements for ethnographies of late twentieth-century modernity worldwide, in: S. Lash & J. Friedman (eds), Modernity and identity, 309-330. Oxford. Meloni, P. 1987a. La Sardegna e la repubblica romana, in: M. Guidetti (ed.), Dalle origini alla fine dell'età bizantina (= Storia dei Sardi e della Sardegna 1), 213-234. Milano. Meloni, P. 1987b. La romanizzazione, in: M. Guidetti (ed.), Dalle origini alla fine dell'età bizantina (= Storia dei Sardi e della Sardegna 1), 263-295. Milano. Meloni, P. 1990. La Sardegna romana (2nd ed.). Sassari. Marcus, G. & M. Fischer 1986. Anthropology as cultural critique. An experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago/London. Miller, D. 1987. Material culture and mass consumption. Oxford. Marras, A.L. 1991. I Fenici nel golfo di Cagliari: Cuccureddus di Villasimius, in: Atti del II Congresso Internazionale di Studi Fenici e Punici (Roma 9-14 novembre 1987), 1039-1048. Roma. Miller, D. 1994. Modernity: an ethnograpic approach. Dualism and mass consumption in Trinidad (= Explorations in Anthropology). Oxford/ Providence. Marras, P. Bartoloni & S. Moscati 1989. Cuccureddus, Rendiconti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Classe di Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche 8 (42) (1987), 225-248. Miller, D., M. Rowlands & C. Tilley 1989. Approaches to the study of domination and resistance, in: D. Miller, M. Rowlands & C. Tilley (eds), Domination and resistance, 1-26. London. Mastino, A. 1985. Le relazioni tra Africa e Sardegna in età romana: inventario preliminare, in: A. Mastino (ed.), L'Africa romana 2 Millett, M. 1990a. The romanization of Britain. An essay in archaeological interpretation. Cambridge. 226 Millett, M. 1990b. Romanization: historical issues and archaeological interpretation, in: T. Blagg & M. Millett (eds), The early Roman empire in the West, 35-41. Oxford. Moscati, S. 1994, L'espansione di Cartagine sul territorio africano, Rendiconti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Classe di Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche 9 (5), 203-214. Millett, M., N. Roymans & J. Slofstra 1995. Integration, culture and ideology in the early Roman West, in: J. Metzler, M. Millett, N. Roymans & J. Slofstra (eds), Integration in the early Roman West. The role of culture and ideology (= Dossiers d'archéologie du musée national d'histoire et d'art 4), 1-5. Luxembourg. Moscati, S. & M.L. Uberti 1988. Testimonianze fenicio-puniche a Oristano, Memorie della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Classe di Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche 8 (31) 1-63. Mitchel, T. 1990. Everyday metaphors of power, Theory and Society 19, 545-577. Morel, J.-P. 1981. Céramique campanienne. Les formes (= Bibliothèque des Ecoles Françaises d'Athènes et de Rome 244). Roma. Morel, J.-P. 1984. Greek colonization in Italy and in the West (Problems of evidence and interpretation), in: T.N. Hackens & R. Holloway (eds), Crossroads of the Mediterranean, 123-161. Louvain-la-Neuve. Morris, I. 1991. The early polis as city and state, in: J. Rich & A. Wallace-Hadrill (eds), City and country in the ancient world (= Leicester-Nottingham studies in ancient society 2), 25-57. London. Morris, I. 1994. Archaeologies of Greece, in: I. Morris (ed.), Classical Greece. Ancient histories and modern archaeologies (= New directions in archaeology), 8- 47. Cambridge. Moscati, S. 1963. La questione fenicia, Rendiconti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Classe di Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche 8 (18), 483- 506. Moscati, S. 1974. Problematica della civiltà fenicia (= Pubblicazione del Centro di Studio per la civiltà Fenicia e Punica 15; Studi Semitici 15). Roma. Moscati, S. 1986. Italia punica. Milano. Moscati, S. 1987. Le officine di Tharros (= Studia Punica 2). Roma. Moscati, S. 1988a. Momenti precoloniali nel Mediterraneo antico, in: E. Acquaro, L. Godart, F. Mazza & D. Musti (eds), Momenti precoloniali nel Mediterraneo antico. Questioni di metodo – Aree d'indagine – Evidenze a confronto, 11-18. Roma. Moscati, S. 1988b. Fenicio o punico o cartaginese, Rivista di Studi Fenici 16, 3-13. Moscati, S. 1991. Dalle stele votive alle stele funerarie: il ‘laboratorio' del Sinis, Rivista di Studi Fenici 19, 145-147. Moscati, S. & M.L. Uberti 1991. Le stele di Uras, Rivista di Studi Fenici 19, 23-26. Moscati, S. & R. Zucca 1989. Le figurine fittili di Neapolis, Memorie della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Classe di Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche 8 (32), 5-80. Nash, D. 1987. Imperial expansion under the Roman Republic, in: M. Rowlands, M. Larsen & K. Kristiansen (eds), Centre and periphery in the ancient world (New directions in archaeology), 87-103. Cambridge. Nicosia, F. 1981. La Sardegna nel mondo classico, in: G. Pugliese Caratelli (ed.), Ichnussa. La Sardegna dalle origini all'età classica, 421-476. Milano. Nieddu, G. & R. Zucca 1991. Othoca. Una città sulla laguna. Oristano. Niemeyer, H.-G. 1980. Auf der suche nach Mainake. Der konflikt zwischen literarischer und archäologischer Überlieferung, Historia 29, 165-185. Niemeyer, H.-G. 1984. Die Phönizier und die Mittelmeerwelt im Zeitalter Homers, Jahrbuch des römisch-germanischen Zentralmuseums Mainz 31, 3- 94. Niemeyer, H.-G. 1990. The Phoenicians in the Mediterranean: a non-Greek model for expansion and settlement in Antiquity, in: J.-P. Descoeudres (ed.), Greek colonists and native populations (Proceedings of the first Australian congress of Classical Archaeology held in honour of Emeritus Professor A.D. Trendall, Sydney 9-14 July 1985), 469-489. Canberra. Niemeyer, H.-G. 1995. Phönizische Archäologie gestern, heute und morgen: eine Disziplin zwischen Chance un Risiko? in: I Fenici: ieri, oggi, domani. Ricerche, scoperte, progetti (Roma 3-5 Marzo 1994), 423-434. Roma. O'Hanlon, R. 1988. Recovering the subject. Subaltern Studies and histories of resistance in colonial South Asia, Modern Asian Studies 22, 189-224. Moscati, S. 1992a. Il santuario dei bambini (tophet) (Itinerari XI). Roma. Odermatt, P. 1996. Built heritage and the politics of (re)presentation. Local reactions to the appropriation of the monumental past in Sardinia, Archaeological Dialogues 3, 95-136. Moscati, S. 1992b. Tra Cartaginesi e Romani: artigianato in Sardegna dal IV a.C. al II d.C., Memorie della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Classe di Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche 9 (3), 1-103. Paderi, M.C. 1982a. Cenni di carattere storico-geografico sul territorio di Sanluri, in: M.C. Paderi & O. Putzolu (eds), Ricerche archeologiche nel territorio di Sanluri, 7-8. Sanluri. Moscati, S. 1992c. Per una storia delle stele puniche, Rendiconti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Classe di Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche 9 (3), 93-107. Paderi, M.C. 1982b. La necropoli di Bidd'e Cresia e le tombe puniche, in: M.C. Paderi & O. Putzolu (eds), Ricerche archeologiche nel territorio di Sanluri, 49- 51. Sanluri. 227 Paderi, M.C. 1982c. L'età romana, in: M.C. Paderi & O. Putzolu (eds), Ricerche archeologiche nel territorio di Sanluri, 59-62. Sanluri. romana X. Atti del X convegno di studio, Oristano 11-13 dicembre 1992, 831-841. Sassari. Paderi, M.C. 1982d. L'insediamento di Fundabi de Andria Peis-Padru Jossu e la necropoli di Giladiri, in: M.C. Paderi & O. Putzolu (eds), Ricerche archeologiche nel territorio di Sanluri, 63-66. Sanluri. Platenkamp, J. 1992. Transforming Tobelo ritual, in: de Coppet (ed.), Understanding rituals, 74-96. London/New York. Paderi, M.C. 1982e. Bidd'e Cresia. Sepolture e corredi di età romana, in: M.C. Paderi & O. Putzolu (eds), Ricerche archeologiche nel territorio di Sanluri, 67-79. Sanluri. Paderi, M.C. & O. Putzolu (eds) 1982. Ricerche archeologiche nel territorio di Sanluri, Sanluri. Pope, K. & T. Van Andel 1984. Late Quaternary alluviation and soil formation in the southern Argolid: its history, causes and archaeological implications, Journal of Archaeological Science 11, 281-306. Porru, C. 1947. Saggio di catalogo archeologico sul foglio 225 della carta d'Italia Quadrante I, tavolette SE-NE, unpublished MA thesis University of Cagliari. Cagliari. Paderi, M.C. & O. Putzolu 1982. Introduzione, in: M.C. Paderi & O. Putzolu (eds), Ricerche archeologiche nel territorio di Sanluri, 5-6. Sanluri. Pracchi, R. 1971. Morfologia, in: R. Pracchi & A. Terrosu Asole (eds), Atlante della Sardegna (Fascicolo 1), 13-16; Tav. 7. Cagliari. Paderi, M.C. & G. Ugas 1988. Sardara, in: G. Lilliu (ed.), L'Antiquarium Arborense e i civici musei della provincia di Cagliari 2540. Milano. Prakash, G. 1995. Introduction: after colonialism, in: G. Prakash (ed.), After colonialism. Imperial histories and postcolonial displacements, 3-17. Princeton. Pais, E. 1881. La Sardegna prima del dominio romano. Studi storici e archeologici, Atti della Reale Accademia dei Lincei. Memorie della classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche 3 (7), 259-378. Prochaska, D. 1990. Making Algeria French. Colonialism in Bône, 1870-1920. Cambridge. Pais, E. 1923. Storia della Sardegna e della Corsica durante il dominio romano. Roma. Parry, B. 1994. Resistance theory / or two cheers for nativism, in: F. Barker, P. Hulme & M. Iversen (eds), Colonial discourse / postcolonial theory, 172-196. Manchester. Pasquin Valéry, J. 1835. Voyage en Corse, à l'île d'Elba et en Sardaigne. Paris. Patton, M 1996. Islands in time: island sociogeography and Mediterranean prehistory. London. Puxeddu, C. 1958. Giacimenti di ossidiano del Monte Arci in Sardegna e la sua irridiazione, Studi Sardi 14- 15 (1955-1957), 10-66. Puxeddu, C. 1975. La Romanizzazione, in: La diocesi di AlesUsellus-Terralba. Aspetti e valori, 165-220. Cagliari. Rathje, A. 1990. Die Phönizier in Etrurien, in U. Gherig & H.-G. Niemeyer (eds), Die Phönizier im Zeitalter Homers, 33-44. Mainz. Rendeli, M. & M. Botto 1993. Nora II. Prospezione a Nora, 1992, Quaderni della Soprintendenza Archeologica per le province di Cagliari e Oristano 10, 151-189. Pecorini, G. 1971. Geologia, in: R. Pracchi & A. Terrosu Asole (eds), Atlante della Sardegna Fascicolo 1, 6-9; Tav. 3. Cagliari. Renfrew, C. 1980. The great tradition versus the great divide: archaeology as anthropology?, American Journal of Archaeology 84, 287-298. Pels, P. 1993. Critical matters. Interactions between missionaries and Waluguru in colonial Tanganyika, 1930-1961, PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam. Amsterdam. Ribichini, S. 1983. Mito e storia: l'immagine dei Fenici nelle fonti classiche, in: Atti del I congresso internazionale di studi fenici e punici, Roma 5-10 Novembre 1979, 443-448. Roma. Pels, P. 1997. The anthropology of colonialism: culture, history and the emergence of Western governmentality, Annual Review of Anthropology 26, 163-183. Rich, J. 1993. Fear, greed and glory: the causes of Roman warmaking in the middle Republic, in: J. Rich & G. Shipley (eds), War and society in the Roman world, 38-68. London. Pianu, G. 1980. Contributo ad un corpus del materiale anforario della Sardegna. Le anfore rodie e le anfore Dressel 1 e Dressel 2/4, Archivio Storico Sardo 31, 11-28. Rich, J. 1996. The origins of the second Punic War, in: T. Cornell, B. Rankov & P. Sabin (eds), The second Punic War. A reappraisal (= Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 67), 137. London. Picard, Ch. 1983. Est-il possible d'écrire une histoire de Carthage? in: Atti del I congresso internazionale di studi fenici e punici, Roma 5-10 Novembre 1979, 279-283. Roma. Ridgway, B. 1986. Mediterranean comparanda for the statues from Monte Prama, in: M. Balmuth (ed.), Studies in Sardinian archaeology 2: Sardinia in the Mediterranean, 61-72. Ann Arbor. Pirazzoli, P. 1976. Sea level variations in the northwest Mediterranean during Roman times, Science 194, 519-521. Ridgway, D. 1992. The first western Greeks. Cambridge. Pirredda, S. 1994. Per uno studio delle aree sacre di tradizione punica della Sardegna romana, in: A. Mastino & P. Ruggeri (eds), L'Africa Ridgway, D. 1995. Archaeology in Sardinia and South Italy 198994, Archaeological Reports for 1994-1995 41, 75-96. 228 Rizzo, M.A. 1991. Alcune importazioni fenicie da Cerveteri, in: Atti del II Congresso Internazionale di Studi Fenici e Punici (Roma 9-14 novembre 1987), 1169-1181. Roma. Santoni, V. 1995. ‘I Nuragici’ e i Fenici: modi dell'incontro. Osservazioni preliminari, in: I Fenici: ieri, oggi, domani. Ricerche, scoperte, progetti (Roma 3-5 Marzo 1994), 435-447. Roma. Rouse, R. 1995. Questions of identity. Personhood and collectivity in transnational migration to the United States, Critique of Anthropology 15, 351-380. Scardigli, B. 1991. I trattati romano-cartaginesi. Pisa. Rowland, R. 1977. Aspetti di continuità culturale nella Sardegna romana, Latomus 36, 460-470. Scavo didattico delle terme romane di Terra 'e Frucca Guspini, 1990. Oristano. Schiffmann, I. 1976. Zur Interpretation der Inschriften IFPCO Sard. 36 und 39 aus Sardinien, Rivista di Studi Fenici 4, 49-52. Rowland, R. 1981. I ritrovamenti romani in Sardegna. Roma. Rowland, R. 1982. Beyond the frontier in Punic Sardinia, American Journal of Ancient History 7, 20- 39. Rowland, R. 1985. The Roman invasion of Sardinia, in: C. Malone & S. Stoddart (eds), Papers in Italian archaeology IV. Part 4, Classical and medieval archaeology (= BAR Int.Ser. 246), 99-117. Oxford. Rowland, R. 1988. The archaeology of Roman Sardinia. A selected typological inventory, in: H. Temporini (ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 11.1, 740-875. Berlin. Rowland, R. 1992. When did the Nuragic period in Sardinia end?, in: Sardinia antiqua. Studi in onore di Piero Meloni in occasione del suo settantesimo compleanno, 165-175. Cagliari. Rowland, R. jr. & S. Dyson 1991. Survey archaeology in Sardinia, in: G. Barker & J. Lloyd (eds), Roman landscapes. Archaeological survey in the Mediterranean region (= Archaeological monographs of the British School at Rome 2), 54-60. London. Rowlands, M. 1984. Conceptualizing the European Bronze and Early Iron Ages, in: J. Bintliff (ed.), European social evolution, 147-156. Bradford. Roymans, N. 1995. Romanization, cultural identity and the ethnic discussion. The integration of the lower Rhine population in the Roman Empire, in: M. Millett, N. Roymans & J. Slofstra (eds), Integration in the early Roman West. The role of culture and ideology (= Dossiers d’archéologie du musée national d’histoire et d’art 4), 47-64. Luxembourg. Roymans, N. 1996. The sword or the plough. Regional dynamics in the romanisation of Belgic Gaul and the Rhineland area, in: N. Roymans (ed.), From the sword to the plough. Three studies on the earliest romanisation of northern Gaul, 9-126. Amsterdam. Sahlins, M. 1985. Islands of history. Chicago/London. Schubart, H. 1995. Péninsule Ibérique, in: V. Krings (ed.), La civilisation phénicienne et punique. Manuel de recherche (= Handbuch der Orientalistik 1, 20), 743-761. Leiden. Scott, J. 1985. Weapons of the weak. Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven. Scott, J. 1990. Domination and the arts of resistance. Hidden transcripts. New Haven. Scullard, H. 1989. The Carthaginians in Spain, in: A. Astin, F. Walbank, M. Frederiksen & R. Ogilvie (eds), Rome and the Mediterranean to 133 BC, (2nd ed.) (= Cambridge Ancient History 8), 17-43. Cambridge. Sebis, S. 1982. Tempio a pozzo nuragico, in V. Santoni (ed.), CabrasCuccuru S'Arriu. Nota preliminare di scavo (1978, 1979, 1980), Rivista di Studi Fenici 10, 103-127 (= Tharros VIII), 111-113. Sebis, S. 1987. Ricerche archeologiche nel Sinis centromeridionale. Nuove acquisizioni di età nuragica, in: G. Lilliu, G. Ugas & G. Lai (eds), La Sardegna nel Mediterraneo tra il secondo e il primo millennio a.C. (Atti del II convegno di studi ‘Un millennio di relazioni fra la Sardegna e i paesi del Mediterraneo’, Selargius-Cagliari 2730 novembre 1986), 107-116. Cagliari. Sebis, S. 1994. Materiali dal villaggio nuragico di Su Cungiau 'e Funtà nel territorio di Nuraxinieddu (OR), Quaderni della Soprintendenza Archeologica per le province di Cagliari e Oristano 11, 89-110. Seuffert, O. 1970. Die Reliefentwicklung der Grabenregion Sardiniens. Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Entstehung von Fussflächsystemen (= Würzburger geographische Arbeiten 24). Würzburg. Shanks, M. 1996. Classical archaeology of Greece. Experiences of the discipline. London. Sheldon, R. 1982. Romanizzazione, acculturazione e resistenza: problemi concettuali nella storia del Nordafrica, Dialoghi di Archeologia n.s. 4, 102-106. Said, E. 1978. Orientalism. London. Said, E. 1993. Culture and imperialism. London. Salvi, D. 1991. Cagliari punica, in: Atti del II Congresso Internazionale di Studi Fenici e Punici (Roma 9-14 novembre 1987), 1215-1220. Roma. Santoni, V. 1985. Il villaggio nuragico di Su Muru Mannu (Tharros XI), Rivista di Studi Fenici 13, 33- 140. Siddu, A. 1982. Tempio a pozzo: le stele puniche, in: V. Santoni (ed.), Cabras-Cuccuru S'Arriu. Nota preliminare di scavo (1978, 1979, 1980), Rivista di Studi Fenici 10, 103-127 (= Tharros VIII), 115-118. Silverblatt, I. 1995. Becoming Indian in the Central Andes of seventeenth-century Peru, in: G. Prakash (ed.), After colonialism. Imperial histories and postcolonial displacements, 279-298. Princeton. 229 Sirago, V. 1992. Aspetti coloniali dell'occupazione romana in Sardegna, in: Sardinia antiqua. Studi in onore di Piero Meloni in occasione del suo settantesimo compleanno, 239-253. Cagliari. Thomas, N. 1996. Cold fusion, American Anthropologist 98, 9-16. Tilley, C. 1994. A phenomenology of landscape. Places, paths and monuments. London. Slofstra, J. 1983. An anthropological approach to the study of romanization processes, in: R. Brandt, & J. Slofstra (eds), Roman and native in the Low Countries (= BAR Int.Ser. 184), 71-104. Oxford. Tore, G. 1982. Corredi da tombe puniche di Bidd'e Cresia, in: M.C. Paderi & O.Putzolu (eds), Ricerche archeologiche nel territorio di Sanluri, 53-58. Sanluri. Snodgrass, A. 1987. An archaeology of Greece. The present state and future scope of a discipline (= Sathers classical lectures 53). Berkeley. Tore, G. 1983. I bronzi figurati fenicio-punici in Sardegna, in: Atti del I congresso internazionale di studi fenici e punici, Roma 5-10 Novembre 1979, 449-461. Roma. Stocking, G. jr. (ed.) 1991. Colonial situations: essays on the contextualization of ethnographic knowledge (= History of anthropology 7). Madison (Wis.). Tore, G. 1984. Per una lettura del complesso nuragico di S'Uraki. loc. Su Pardu, S. Vero Milis-Oristano (Sardegna), in: W. Waldren, R. Chapman, J. Lewthwaite & R.-C. Kennard (eds), The Deya conference of prehistory. Early settlement in the western Mediterranean islands and the peripheral areas (= BAR Int.Ser. 229) 2, 703-723. Oxford. Stoler, A. 1989. Rethinking colonial categories: European communities and the boundaries of rule, Comparative studies in Society and History 31, 134- 161. Sznycer, M. 1976. L'expansion Phénico-punique dans la Méditerranée occidentale (Problèmes et méthodes), in: Actes du IIe congrès international d'étude des cultures de la Méditerranée occidentale 1, 35-48. Algiers. Taramelli, A. 1918a. Il tempio nuragico di S. Anastasia in Sardara (prov. di Cagliari), Monumenti Antichi della Reale Accademia dei Lincei 25, 5-130. Taramelli, A. 1918b. Ricerche ed esplorazioni nell'antica Cornus, Notizie degli Scavi di Antichità, 285-331. Taramelli, A. 1927. Arbus (Cagliari). Tomba a poliandro in regione Fontanazzu di tipo protosardo, con materiali punici e romani, Notizie degli Scavi di Antichità 6 (3), 360-366. Taramelli, A. 1929. Edizione archeologica della carta d'Italia al 100.000, Foglio 216 (Capo S. Marco). Firenze. Taramelli, A. 1935. Edizione archeologica della carta d'Italia al 100.000, Foglio 205 (Capo Mannu) e Foglio 206 (Macomer). Firenze. Taylor, J. in press. Cultural deposition processes and postdepositional processes, in: R. Francovich & H. Patterson (eds), Methodological issues in Mediterranean landscape archaeology. Artefact studies. Oxford. Taussig, M. 1987. Shamanism, colonialism and the wild man. A study in terror and healing. Chicago/ London. Thébert, Y. 1978. Romanisation et déromanisation en Afrique: histoire décolonisée ou histoire inversée?, Annales ESC 33, 65-82. Thomas, N. 1990. Partial texts: representation, colonialism, and agency in Pacific history, Journal of Pacific History 25, 139-158. Thomas, N. 1991. Entangled objects: exchange, colonialism and material culture in the Pacific. Cambridge (Mass.). Thomas, N. 1994. Colonialism's culture. Anthropology, travel and government. Cambridge. 230 Tore, G. 1986. Intorno a un ‘torciere’ bronzeo di tipo cipriota da San Vero Milis (S'Uraki)-Oristano, in: G. Ugas & G. Lai (eds), Società e cultura in Sardegna nei periodi orientalizzante e arcaico. Rapporti tra Sardegna, Fenici, Etruschi e Greci (Atti del 1 convegno di studi ‘Un millennio di relazioni fra la Sardegna e i paesi del Mediterraneo’, Selargius-Cagliari 29-30 novembre, 1 dicembre 1985), 65-76. Cagliari. Tore, G. 1991. Ricerche fenicio-puniche nel Sinis (OR-Sardegna), in: Atti del II Congresso Internazionale di Studi Fenici e Punici (Roma 9-14 novembre 1987), 1263-1269. Roma. Tore, G. 1992. Testimonianze fenicio-puniche nella Sardegna centro-settentrionale, in: R. Tykot & T. Andrews (eds), Sardinia in the Mediterranean: a footprint in the sea (Studies in Sardinian archaeology presented to Miriam S. Balmuth) (= Monographs in Mediterranean Archaeology 3), 429-438. Sheffield. Tore, G. 1995a. L'insediamento fenicio-punico di Pani Loriga di Santadi (Cagliari), in: V. Santoni (ed.), Carbonia e il Sulcis. Archeologia e territorio, 239-252. Oristano. Tore, G. 1995b. Ricerche e studi di Archeologia fenicio-punica in Sardegna (1989-1994), in: I Fenici: ieri, oggi, domani. Ricerche, scoperte, progetti (Roma 3-5 Marzo 1994), 449-454. Roma. Tore, G. & A. Stiglitz 1987a. L'insediamento preistorico e protostorico nel Sinis settentrionale. Ricerche e acquisizioni, in: G. Lilliu, G. Ugas & G. Lai (eds), La Sardegna nel Mediterraneo tra il secondo e il primo millennio a.C. (Atti del II convegno di studi ‘Un millennio di relazioni fra la Sardegna e i paesi del Mediterraneo’, Selargius-Cagliari 27-30 novembre 1986), 91-105. Cagliari. Tore, G. & A. Stiglitz 1987b. Gli insediamenti fenicio-punici nel Sinis settentrionale e nelle zone contermini (ricerche archeologiche 1979-1987), Quaderni della Soprintendenza Archeologica per le province di Cagliari e Oristano 4 (1), 161-174. Tore, G. & A. Stiglitz 1987c. Ricerche archeologiche nel Sinis e nell'alto Oristanese (continuità e trasformazione nell'Evo Antico), in: A. Mastino (ed.), L'Africa Romana. Atti del 4. convegno di studio, Sassari 12-14 dicembre 1986, 633-658. Sassari. Tore, G. & A. Stiglitz 1992. Osservazioni di iconografia nuragica nel Sinis e nell'alto Oristanese (Ricerche 1980-1987), in: G. Lai, G. Ugas & G. Lilliu (eds), La Sardegna nel Mediterraneo tra il Bronzo Medio ed il Bronzo Recente (XVI-XIII sec. a.C.) (Atti del III convegno di studi ‘Un millennio di relazioni fra la Sardegna e i paesi del Mediterraneo’, Selargius-Cagliari 19-22 novembre 1987), 89-105. Cagliari. Tore, G.& A. Stiglitz 1994. Urbanizzazione e territorio: considerazioni sulla colonizzazione fenicio-punica in Sardegna. 1-L'urbanizzazione e lo spazio urbano. 2-Lo spazio rurale: parametri geografici e indicatori territoriali, in: A. Mastino & P. Ruggeri (eds), L'Africa Romana. Atti del X convegno di studio (Oristano, 11-13 dicembre 1992), 779-808. Sassari. Tore, G., A. Stiglitz & M. Dadea 1988. Ricerche archeologiche nel Sinis e nell'Oristanese, II (1980-1987), in: A. Mastino (ed.), L'Africa Romana. Atti del 5. convegno di studio, Sassari 11-13 dicembre 1987, 453-474. Sassari. Trigger, B. 1984. Alternative archaeologies: nationalist, colonialist, imperialist, Man 19, 355-370. Trigger, B. 1989. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge. Tronchetti, C. 1981. Monte Prama (Com. di Cabras, Oristano), Studi Etruschi 49, 525-527. Tronchetti, C. 1984. The cities of Roman Sardinia, in: M. Balmuth & R. Rowland (eds), Studies in Sardinian Archaeology, 237-283. Ann Arbor. Tronchetti, C. 1985. I Greci e la Sardegna, Dialoghi di Archeologia (ser.3) 3, 17-34. Tronchetti, C. 1986. Nuragic statuary from Monte Prama, in: M. Balmuth (ed.), Studies in Sardinian archaeology. Vol. 2: Sardinia in the Mediterranean, 41-59. Ann Arbor. Tronchetti, C. 1988. I Sardi. Traffici, relazioni, ideologie nella Sardegna arcaica = (Biblioteca di Archeologia, vol. 9). Milano. Tronchetti, C. 1989. Sant'Antioco romana, in: P. Bartoloni, Sulcis, (Itinerari 3), 79-87. Roma. Tronchetti, C. 1992. Le fasi di vita, in: C. Tronchetti, I. Chessa, L. Cappai, L. Manfredi, V. Santoni & C. Sorrentino, Lo scavo di via Brenta a Cagliari. I livelli fenicio-punici e romani. (= Quaderni della Soprintendenza Archeologica per le Province di Cagliari e Oristano 9, Supplemento), 23-35. Cagliari. Tronchetti, C. 1995a. Sardaigne, in: V. Krings (ed.), La civilisation phénicienne et punique. Manuel de recherche (= Handbuch der Orientalistik 1, 20), 712- 742. Leiden. Tronchetti, C. 1995b. Le problematiche del territorio del Sulcis in età romana, in: V. Santoni (ed.), Carbonia e il Sulcis. Archeologia e territorio, 263-275. Oristano. Tronchetti, C. 1996. La ceramica della Sardegna romana (Materiali, studi, ricerche 7 -sezione archeologica). Milano. Trump, D. 1990. Nuraghe Noeddos and the Bonu Ighinu Valley excavation and survey in Sardinia. Oxford. Turner, L. 1995. Consuming colonialism, Critique of Anthropology 15, 203-212. Tykot, R. 1992. The sources and distribution of Sardinian obsidian, in: R. Tykot & T. Andrews (eds), Sardinia in the Mediterranean: a footprint in the sea, (Studies in Sardian archaeology presented to Miraim S. Belmuth) (= Monographs in Mediteranean Archaeology 3) 57-70. Sheffield. Ugas, G. 1980. Le scoperte e gli scavi lungo i secoli, in: Nur. La misteriosa civiltà dei Sardi, 299-304. Milano. Ugas, G. 1982a. Documenti del età nuragica, in: M.C. Paderi & O. Putzolu (eds), Ricerche archeologiche nel territorio di Sanluri, 37-38. Sanluri. Ugas, G. 1982b. Corti Beccia. Il nuraghe e i reperti, in: M.C. Paderi & O. Putzolu (eds), Ricerche archeologiche nel territorio di Sanluri, 39-47. Sanluri. Ugas, G. 1986. La produzione materiale nuragica. Note sull'apporto etrusco e greco, in: G. Ugas & G. Lai (eds), Società e cultura in Sardegna nei periodi orientalizzante e arcaico. Rapporti tra Sardegna, Fenici, Etruschi e Greci (Atti del 1 convegno di studi ‘Un millennio di relazioni fra la Sardegna e i paesi del Mediterraneo’, Selargius-Cagliari 29-30 novembre, 1 dicembre 1985), 41-53. Cagliari. Ugas, G. 1989. I rapporti di scambio fra Etruschi e Sardi. Considerazioni alla luce delle nuove indagini a Santu Brai-Furtei, in: Atti del secondo congresso internazionale etrusco (Firenze 26 Maggio – 2 Giugno 1985) (Supplementum Studi Etruschi) vol. 2, 1063- 1072. Roma. Ugas, G. & E. Usai 1987. Nuovi scavi nel santuario nuragico di Sant'Anastasìa di Sardara, in: G. Lilliu, G. Ugas & G. Lai (eds), La Sardegna nel Mediterraneo tra il secondo e il primo millennio a.C. (Atti del II convegno di studi ‘Un millennio di relazioni fra la Sardegna e i paesi del Mediterraneo’, Selargius-Cagliari 27-30 novembre 1986), 167-218. Cagliari. Ugas, G. & M.C. Paderi 1990. Persistenze rituali e cultuali in età punica e romana nel sacello nuragico del vano e della fortezza di Su Mulinu-Villanovafranca (Cagliari), in: A.Mastino (ed.), L'Africa romana 7 (Atti del convegno di studio, Sassari 15-17 dicembre 1989), 475-486. Sassari. Ugas, G. & R. Zucca 1984. Il commercio arcaico in Sardegna. Importazioni etrusche e greche (620-480 a.C.), 58-86. Cagliari. Usai, E. 1984. Usellus (Oristano), loc. Motrox' Bois, in: E. Anti, I Sardi, la Sardegna dal Paleolitico all'età romana, 192-194. Milano. Usai, E. 1987. Materiali dell'età del ferro in Marmilla, in: G. Lilliu, G. Ugas & G. Lai (eds), La Sardegna nel Mediterraneo tra il secondo e il primo millennio a.C. (Atti del II convegno di studi ‘Un millennio di relazioni fra la Sardegna e i paesi del Mediterraneo’, Selargius-Cagliari 27-30 novembre 1986), 243-254. Cagliari. Usai, E. 1991. Testimonianze di cultura materiale fenicia nei centri indigeni della Sardegna, in: Atti del II Congresso Internazionale di Studi Fenici e Punici (Roma 9-14 novembre 1987), 1285-1290. Roma. 231 Usai, L.A. 1987. Strutture di età nuragica in località S. Maria is Acquas, Quaderni della Soprintendenza Archeologica per le province di Cagliari e Oristano 4, 139-151. Vallat, J.-P. 1987. Les structures agraires de l'Italie républicaine, Annales ESC 42, 181-218. Van de Velde, P. 1996. Off-site probleemstellingen, nonsite technieken, Tijdschrift voor Mediterrane Archeologie 17, 22-29. Van Dommelen, P. 1992. Una riconsiderazione di ricognizioni estensive: il caso dello Scarlino-survey, in: M. Bernardi (ed.), L'archeologia del paesaggio. (Atti del IV Ciclo di Lezioni sulla Ricerca Applicata in Campo Archeologico) Certosa di Pontignano (Siena), 859-876. Firenze. Van Dommelen, P. 1993. Roman peasants and rural organisation in central Italy: an archaeological perspective, in: E. Scott (ed.), Theoretical Roman Archaeology: first conference proceedings, 167186. Aldershot. Van Dommelen, P. 1997a. Colonial constructs: colonialism and archaeology in the Mediterranean, World Archaeology 28, 305-323. Van Dommelen, P. 1997b. Some reflections on urbanization in a colonial context. West central Sardinia in the 7th to 5th century BC, in: H. Damgaard Andersen, H. Horsnœs, S. Houby-Nielsen & A. Rathje (eds), Urbanization in the Mediterranean in the 9th to the 6th centuries BC. Proceedings of the International Symposium in Copenhagen (May 1994) (= Acta Hyperborea 7, 243-278). Copenhagen. Van Dommelen, P. 1998. Punic persistence: colonialism and cultural identity in Roman Sardinia, in: J. Berry & R. Laurence (eds), Cultural identity in the Roman empire, 25-48. London. Van Dommelen, P. in press a. Insediamento rurale in età punica nella Sardegna centro-occidentale, in: Actas del IV Congreso Internacional de Estudios Fenicios y Púnicos, Cádiz, 2-6 Octubre 1995. Van Dommelen, P. in press b. Lo spazio rurale fra pianura e colline in età punica: Campidano e Marmilla a confronto, in: M. Khanoussi, P. Ruggeri & C. Vismara (eds), L'Africa Romana XII. L'organizzazione dello spazio rurale nelle province in Nord Africa e nella Sardegna. Sassari. Verga, F. 1994. Tharros e Cartagine: due metropoli a confronto. Note topografiche, Rivista di Studi Fenici 22, 263-268. Vismara, C. 1980. Sarda Ceres. Busti fittili della Sardegna romana (= Quaderni della Soprintendenza ai beni archeologici per le province di Sassari e Nuoro 11). Sassari. Vismara, C. 1990. Sopravvivenze puniche e persistenze indigene nel Nord Africa ed in Sardegna in età romana. Introduzione, in: A. Mastino (ed.), L'Africa romana 7 (Atti del convegno di studio, Sassari 15-17 dicembre 1989), 39-47. Sassari. Wagner, C. 1989. The Carthaginians in ancient Spain from administrative trade to territorial annexation, in: H. Devijver & E. Lipinski (eds), Punic Wars (= Studia Phoenica 10), 145-156. Leuven. 232 Webster, G. 1991. Monuments, mobilization and Nuragic organization, Antiquity 65, 840-856. Webster, G. 1996. A prehistory of Sardinia, 2300-500 BC (= Monographs in Mediterranean Archaeology 5). Sheffield. Webster, G. & M. Teglund 1992. Towards the study of colonialnative relations in Sardinia c. 1000 BC-AD 400, in: R. Tykot & T. Andrews (eds), Sardinia in the Mediterranean: a footprint in the sea (Studies in Sardinian archaeology presented to Miriam S. Balmuth) (= Monographs in Mediterranean Archaeology 3), 448-473. Sheffield. Webster, J. 1996a. Roman imperialism and the post-imperial age, in: J. Webster & N. Cooper (eds), Roman imperialism: postcolonial perspectives (= Leicester archaeology monographs 3), 1-18. Leicester. Webster, J. 1996b. Ethnographic barbarity: colonial discourse and ‘Celtic warrior societies', in: J. Webster & N. Cooper (eds), Roman imperialism: post-colonial perspectives (= Leicester archaeology monographs 3), 111-123. Leicester. Webster, J. 1997. Necessary comparisons: a post-colonial approach to religious syncretism in the Roman provinces, World Archaeology 28, 324-338. Weiner, A. 1985. Inalienable wealth, American Ethnologist 12, 210227. Whitehouse, R. & J. Wilkins 1989. Greeks and natives in south-east Italy: approaches to the archaeological evidence, in: T. Champion (ed.), Centre and periphery. Comparative studies in archaeology, 102-126. London. Whittaker, C. 1978. Carthaginian imperialism in the fifth and fourth centuries, in: P. Garnsey & C. Whittaker (eds), Imperialism in the ancient world, 59- 90. Cambridge. Whittaker, D. 1995. Integration of the early Roman West: the example of Africa, in: J. Metzler, M. Millett, N. Roymans & J. Slofstra (eds), Integration in the early Roman West. The role of culture and ideology (= Dossiers d’archéologie du musée national d’histoire en d’art 4), 19-32. Luxembourg. Williams, R. 1977. Marxism and literature. Oxford. Wolf, E. 1982. Europe and the people without history. Berkeley. Woolf, G. 1990. World-systems analysis and the Roman empire, Journal of Roman Archaeology 3, 44- 58. Woolf, G. 1992. The unity and diversity of Romanisation, Journal of Roman Archaeology 5, 349- 352. Woolf, G. 1995. The formation of Roman provincial cultures, in: J. Metzler, M. Millett, N. Roymans & J. Slofstra (eds), Integration in the early Roman West. The role of culture and ideology (= Dossiers d’archéologie du musée national d’histoire en d’art 4), 9-18. Luxembourg. Woolf, G. 1997. Beyond Romans and natives, World Archaeology 28, 339-350. Yardley, J. & R. Develin (eds) 1994. Justin. Epitome of the Philippic History of Pompeius Trogus (= American Philological Association Classical Resources 3), 1-11. Atlanta. Young, R. 1990. White mythologies. Writing history and the West. London. Zucca, R. 1989a. La necropoli fenicia di S. Giovanni di Sinis, Quaderni della soprintendenza archeologica per le province di Cagliari e Oristano 6-supplemento (‘riti funerari e di olocausto nella Sardegna fenicia e punica; Atti del incontro di studio, Sant'Antioco 3-4 ottobre 1986), 89-107. Zucca, R. 1989b. Il tempio di Antas, Sassari (Guide e itinerari 11). Zucca, R. 1987a. Neapolis e il suo territorio. Oristano. Zucca, R. 1987b. Bronzi nuragici da Tharros, in: G. Lilliu, G. Ugas & G. Lai (eds), La Sardegna nel Mediterraneo tra il secondo e il primo millennio a.C. (Atti del II convegno di studi ‘Un millennio di relazioni fra la Sardegna e i paesi del Mediterraneo’, SelargiusCagliari 27-30 novembre 1986), 117-32. Cagliari. Zucca, R. 1988. Le civitates Barbariae e l'occupazione militare della Sardegna: aspetti e confronti con l'Africa, in: A. Mastino (ed.), L'Africa Romana V (Atti del 5. convegno di studio, Sassari 11-13 dicembre 1987), 349-373. Sassari. Zucca, R. 1990. Le persistenze preromane nei poleonimi e negli antroponimi della Sardinia in: A. Mastino (ed.), L'Africa romana 7 (Atti del convegno di studio, Sassari 15-17 dicembre 1989), 655-667. Sassari. Zucca, R. 1991. La città punica di Neapolis in Sardegna, in: Atti del II Congresso Internazionale di Studi Fenici e Punici (Roma 9-14 novembre 1987), 1299-1311. Roma. Zucca, R. 1995. I rapporti tra l'Africa e la Sardinia alla luce dei documenti archeologici. Nota preliminare, Archivio Storico Sardo 38, 83-102. 233