Processi biologici per la rimozione dell`atrazina nelle falde
Transcript
Processi biologici per la rimozione dell`atrazina nelle falde
Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II Facoltà di Ingegneria Corso di Laurea in Ingegneria per l’Ambiente ed il Territorio Elaborato di Laurea Processi biologici per la rimozione dell’atrazina nelle falde contaminate Anno Accademico 2014/2015 Relatore:Prof.Massimiliano Fabbricino Candidato:Valerio Volpecina 1 Sommario • Inquinamento falde • Che cosa è l’atrazina e i sui effetti sull’ambiente • Analisi di diversi studi sui processi biologici per la rimozione dell’atrazina e dei fattori principali da cui sono influenzati • Conclusioni 2 Inquinamento falde Cause • Pesticidi e fertilizzanti usati in agricoltura • Discariche di rifiuti non adeguatamente impermeabilizzate(discariche non controllate) • Scarichi industriali • Scarichi civili,perdite sistema fognario,ecc…. 3 Atrazina Gruppo s-triazine Struttura atrazina 4 should be present in drinking water [23]. As such no guidelines exist till now on the permissible limit of atrazine concentration on effluent discharged into water bodies. TOXICITY OF ATRAZINE In most of the cases, toxicity effect of atrazine was observed at higher concentrations or doses, but detrimental effects on several species of algae were observed even at an atrazine concentration as low as 20 ppb [24]. Although it is less toxic to mammal, birds and fishes, many aquatic organisms are susceptible to atrazine at low levels [13]. Although atrazine is placed in toxicity class III by USEPA, which means it is slightly toxic, it has been classified as restricted use pesticide (RUP) due to its ground water contamination potential. Also exposure to atrazine may cause detrimental effects and irritation to eyes, nose and throat [25]. Due to the toxicity behavior of atrazine, German Government banned all atrazine-containing products in 1991 [26]. Effetti dell’atrazina sugli esseri viventi • Tossicità acuta e cronica Acute Toxicity toxicity is the ability of a substance to cause harmful effects soon after a single • Acute Cancerogenicità exposure or dose or any severe poisonous effect resulting from a single short-term exposure a toxic substance. LD (lethal dose 50) is defined as the dose that kills 50% of a • topopulation Mutagenicità edoraleffetti sulla toriproduzione(studi condotti da be 1869-3080, 1750-3992 and 750 of test animals. The LD was observed mg of technical grade atrazine/kg for rats, mice and rabbits respectively [13]. The 1-hour and Concentration) was observed to be greater than 0.7 mg l and 4-hour inhalation LC (Lethal Tyron Hayes sugli anfibi) 5.2 mg l respectively in rats [25, 27]. Table 1 shows the LD of atrazine on various test 50 50 -1 -1 50 50 species. It had been observed that after consuming a large oral dose, rat exhibits muscular weakness, breathing difficulty, prostration, convulsions and death [21]. LD50:dose letale perTable il 50%1.della di cavieon testata. value of atrazine various test species LD popolazione 50 Type LD50 LD50 LD50 LD50 LD50 LD50 LD50 LD50 mode oral intraperitoneal oral oral skin oral inhalation intraperitoneal Species Rat Rat Mouse Rabbit Rabbit Humane Rat Mouse Amount 672 235 850 750 7500 1000 5200 626 Units mg kg-1 mg kg-1 mg kg-1 mg kg-1 mg kg-1 mg kg-1 mg m-3 4hr-1 mg kg-1 5 Tecniche di rimozione • Trattamenti chimici • Trattamenti termici(Incenerimento) • Trattamenti fisici(Adsorbimento) • Trattamenti biologici Utilizzo di macrofiti(Fitorimediazione) Utilizzo di biomasse microbiche 6 the control of atrazine, biological method is the only method that can mineralize atrazine. eudomonas preferentially utilize isopropyl side chain than ethyl side chain. Next alkylation was deamination in which Cyanuric acid was formed. Consequent stepspathway Biodegradation conversion of cyanuric acid to biuret, decomposiotn of biuret to urea by urease Understanding the biodegradation pathway of any pollutant in a specific condition is useful for degradation and the degradation end products were CO2 and NH3 [120]. Completebetter application and control. Atrazine degradation can occur via biotic and abiotic e was observed through continued hydroxylation of the triazine ring and Atrazine the biodegradation had been reviewed extensively by Kaufman and Kearney9 processes. of anniline, ammelide and cyanuric acid prior to ring cleavage, and finally to CO 2 Lee [110] whereas, the abiotic detoxification and degradation had been and Erickson and [117]. Considering all the above results a proposed pathwayreviewed of atrazine by Jordan et al. [111]. Structure of various intermediates, which could be produced ation is shown in figure 2. during the biodegradation process, is described in Figure 1. Percorso di degradazione dell’atrazina proposto da Erickson e Lee X Deethyldeisopropylatrazine Deethylatrazine N N Deisopropylatrazine Atrazine R-1 (4) R-2 (6) N Hydroxyatrazine Deethylhydroxyatrazine Deisopropylhydroxyatrazine Deethyldeisopropylhydroxyatrazine Cyanuric Acid Biuret Urea CO2 + NH3 X (2), R-1(4) and R-2 (6) are the substituted groups in s-triazine ring in 2, 4 and 6 positions respectively. Common Name X R-1 R-2 Atrazine Cl C2H5NH CH3CHCH3NH Hydroxyatrazine OH C2H5NH CH3CHCH3NH Deethylatrazine Deisopropylatrazine Deethyldeisopropylatrazine Deethylhydroxyatrazine Deisopropylhydroxyatrazine Cl Cl Cl OH OH NH2 C2H5NH NH2 NH2 C2H5NH CH3CHCH3NH NH2 NH2 CH3CHCH3NH NH2 Deethyldeisopropylhydroxyatrazine OH NH2 NH2 Cyanuric acid OH OH OH Urea Biuret Figure 1. Structure of atrazine and its transformed products Structure of different components has been illustrated in Figure 1. Figure 2. Atrazine biodegradation pathway 7 Principali fattori che influenzano il tasso di degradazione dell’atrazina • Fonti di ossigeno esterne Studi di Armstrong sulla dipendenza del tasso di degradazione dalla presenza di materia organica assimilabile • Fonti di azoto esterne Studi di Gebendinger con l’uso del batterio M91-3 • Contenuto d’acqua del suolo Studi di Hurle e Kibler sulla dipendenza dell’emivita dell’atrazina dal contenuto d’acqua nei terreni sabbiosi ghiaiosi 8 The 23 isolates that showed variable growth stimulation in the resistance/sensitivity test were individually enriched in 2X RD Atrazine amended-liquid cultures for 10 days to select the most promising acclimatized bacteria for biodegradation of Atrazine in the contaminated soils (Table 6). Results revealed the following: Based on the Atrazine-enrichment test and the visual bioassay screening, 20 indigenous and 3 exogenous purified isolates were classified into genera and/or species whenever possible. All Atrazine-resistant isolates from the tested soils were Gram-negative rods expect 8 Gram-positive rods (R2, R5, R12, R13, R16, R17, R21 and R23). They shaped long, short or puffy bacilli. Genomic DNA was prepared from the selected isolates, the PCR products were purified and the two strands of each amplicon were sequenced using chain terminator method (Bioneer Company, Korea). The 16S rDNA gene sequences of the isolates were submitted to GeneBank sequencing data and aligned against the 16S rDNA sequences of Ribosomal 127Table 7 compiles GeneBank accession numDatabase project. bers of the highest sequence similarity as well as the closest neighbor(s) to the 16S rDNA gene partial sequences of the Batteri resistenti all’atrazina Isolation, identification and acclimatization of Atrazine-resistant 1. Applying Atrazine at its highest dose produced the most resistant isolates which possess the highest degradative capabilities. Seven isolates (R1, R9, R16, R20, R21, R22 and R23) exhibited remarkable stimulation (S: 70.7soil 88.7%) bacteria in their growth and considered acclimatized and highly Atrazine-resistant, therefore, were selected for bioremediation experiment. Studio condotto da El-Bestawy,J.Sabir,A.H.Mansy,N.Zabermawi Table 7 Similarity percentages to the nearest neighbors of the selected isolates. Isolate No. Nearest neighbor(s) Table 6 Stimulation/inhibition total viable count (TVC) of the indigenous and % exogenous bacteria in Atrazine-enrichment test. GenBank Accession of the of Nearest Neighbor Similarity R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 R10 R11 R12 R13 R14 R15 R16 R17 R18 R19 R20 R21 R22 R23 Enterobacter cloacae 279-56 Bacilluscereus ATCC 14579 Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 Enterobacter cloacae 279-56 Bacillus anthracis str. Ames Ochrobactrum intermedium CCUG 24694 Pseudomonas balearica SP1402 Pseudomonas indica IMT37 Pseudomonas indica IMT37 Pseudomonas balearica SP1402 Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579 Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579 Providencia vermicola OP1 Providencia vermicola OP1 Bacillus anthracis str. Ames Bacillus anthracis str. Ames Pseudomonas otitidis MCC10330 Pseudomonas otitidis MCC10330 Pseudomonas otitidis MCC10330 Bacillus anthracis str. Ames Providencia vermicola OP1 Bacillus cereus ATCC14579 NR-028912.1 95 C 2X RD NR-074540.1 98 88.7a E 1.10 9.7 – R1 Soil NR-074828.1 95 – 1.6 1.0 37.5d R2 SoilE E b R3 Soil 2.4 7.2 66.7 – NR-028912.1 95 2.8 4.3 34.9c – R4 SoilE NR-0744531.1 91 69.6b 1.7 5.6 – R5 SoilE E c NR-042447.1 97 38.7 1.9 3.1 – R6 Soil M c 1.7 2.6 – R7 Soil NR-025972.1 93 34.6 M 9.6 6.6 – 31.3d R8 Soil M a NR-028801.1 96 R9 Soil 2.4 9.3 74.2 – 1.3 2.6 – R10 SoilM NR-028801.1 96 50.0b 2.3 0.19 · 107 – 99.9d R11 SoilM NR-025972.1 95 b R12 MC-P 3.4 6.5 47.7 – NR-074828.1 96 – 2.8 · 106 80.9d R13 MC-P 1.46 · 107 R14 MC-P 1.3 0.01 99.2d NR-074540.1 96 – R15 MC-P 9.833 0.88 · 107 – 99.9d NR-074540.1 96 70.7a R16 MC-P 1.2 4.1 – – R17 MC-P 1.5 1.9 NR-042415.1 96 21.1c 1.32 0.14 · 108 – 98.9d R18 SoilH NR-042415.1 97 – R19 SoilH 2.8 1.4 50.0d NR-074453.1 97 87.4a R20 SoilH 1.2 9.5 – a – R21 PF 1.9 6.6 NR-074453.1 99 71.2a – R22 PS 1.3 5.9 77.9 NR-043289.1 95 77.3a – R23 PQ 1.5 6.6 NR-043289.1 96 Al-Shame area, Saudi Arabia; SoilE: El-Sharqia Governorate, SoilM: Abu El-Matameer area, El-Behaira Governorate, Egypt; SoilH: Hada NR-043289.1 Egypt; C: control; 2X RD: double recommended dose of Atrazine; MC-P:97 mixed culture of exogenous bacteria. a Remarkable growth. NR-074453.1 94 b High growth. c NR-042415.1 95 Medium growth. d Inhibited growth. NR-074540.1 97 Bacterial isolate Source TVC (CFU · 109) Growth stimulation (S%) Growth inhibition (I%) Alla fine di questo studio solo sette batteri appartenenti a quattro from which these soils were collected. Salt levels have strong tested strains. Sequences of the tested isolates were affiliated effects not only on the microbial biodiversity, but also on according to their 16S rDNAgene to members of 5 genera famiglie diverse(Enterobacter,Pseudonomas,Bacillus,Providencia) sono the sensitive and semi-sensitive higher plants. In addition, they namely Enterobacter (E. cloacae), Bacillus (B. cereus and B. also disturb the relations between plant roots and microbial anthracis), Pseudomonas (P. aeruginosa, P. balearica, P. indica stati ritenuti efficaci per essere usati nel processo di degradazione communities. Variations in Atrazine fate depending on soil and P. otitidis), Ochrobactrum (O. intermedium) and Providencharacteristics are consistent with those reported by Shifu cia (P. vermicola) with similarities ranged between 91% and and Yunzhang (2007) during photocatalytic degradation of dell’atrazina da falde contaminate. 99%. glyphosate in aqueous solution using TiO powder. The phylogenetic relationships of the experimental isolates 2 9 Conclusioni • L’atrazina è una sostanza tossica e persistente in condizioni normali,essa è uno degli inquinanti più comuni nelle acque di falda. • Anche se il percorso di Biodegradazione dell’atrazina non è ancora perfettamente chiaro,la presenza di altra materia organica biodegradabile,fonti di azoto e contenuto d’acqua del suolo sono i fattori principali che controllano il suo tasso di degradazione. • Dagli studi analizzati si intuisce come a volte sia molto difficile eliminare completamente il contaminante.Pertanto, si dovrebbe dare più importanza alla prevenzione dell'inquinamento,per prevenire a priori piuttosto che cercare di porre un rimedio a volte impossibile. • Un importante rimedio può essere rappresentato dall’agricoltura 10 biologica.