The Hume Literature, 2000

The Hume Literature, 2000
William Edward Morris
Hume Studies Volume XXVII, Number 2 (November, 2001) 357-368.
Your use of the HUME STUDIES archive indicates your acceptance of HUME STUDIES’ Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.humesociety.org/hs/about/terms.html. HUME STUDIES’ Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have
obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple
copies of articles, and you may use content in the HUME STUDIES archive only for your
personal, non-commercial use.
Each copy of any part of a HUME STUDIES transmission must contain the same
copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.
For more information on HUME STUDIES contact [email protected]
http://www.humesociety.org/hs/
HUMESTUDIES
Volume 27, Number 2, November 2001, pp. 357-368
The Hume Literature, 2000
WILLIAM EDWARD MORRIS
This bibliography covers the Hume literature for 2000. I am grateful to all
those who contributed additions or corrections to previous bibliographies,
and I again encourage readers of Hume Studies to supply additions, corrections, or bibliographical information still missing from any of these listings.
For the Hume literature prior to 1986, the reader should consult Roland
Hall’s authoritative Fifty Years of Hume Scholarship: A Bibliographic Guide
(Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1978), which covers the period 1925
to 1976, and also lists significant earlier work on Hume. Hall’s bibliographies in Hume Studies supplement that work. They appeared from 1978 to
1988 and cover the Hume literature for the years 1977 to 1985. My bibliographies depart from Hall’s practice in that they do not list items published in
Hume Studies. Articles and reviews that appeared in Hume Studies from 1975
through 1993 (volumes 1-19) were comprehensively indexed in the November 1993 issue. Subsequent November issues include an index for that year.
The next bibliography, which will cover the Hume literature for 2001,
will appear in the November 2002 issue of Hume Studies. Readers are invited to
send me notices or offprints of their articles, reviews, editions, anthologies,
and dissertations for inclusion in the next bibliography. Please e-mail or write
me at the addresses listed at the bottom of the preceding page.
The following abbreviations of journal titles are used here:
APQ
AJP
BJHP
American Philosophical Quarterly
Australasian Journal ofPhilosophy
British Journal for the History ofPhilosophy
~~~
~
William Edward Morris is Associate Professor of Philosophy, Illinois Wesleyan University,
Bloomington, IL 61702-2900.
e-mail: [email protected]
3 58
William Edward Mom’s
BJPS
CJP
HPQ
JAAC
JHI
JHP
JP
PAS
PB
PPQ
PQ
PR
PPR
PS
RIP
RM
Rs
SJP
British Journal for thePhilosophy ofscience
Canadian Journal ofPhilosophy
History ofphilosophy Quarterly
Journal ofAesthetics andArt Criticism
Journal of the History ofldeas
Journal of the History ofPhilosophy
Journal ofPhilosophy
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society
Philosophical Books
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly
Philosophical Quarterly
Philosophical Review
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
Philosophical Studies
Revue Internationale de Philosophie
Review ofMetaph ysics
Religious Studies
Southern Journal ofPhilosophy
Abbruzzese, John E. “Garrrett on the Theological Objection to Hume’s
Compatibilism.” BJHP 8.2 (2000): 345-52.
Annas, Julia. “Hume and Ancient Scepticism.” Acta Philosophica Fennica 66
(2000): 271-85.
Antognazza, Maria-Rosa. “I1rilancio degli studi reidiani ad Aberdeen e il nuovo
catalog0 dei manoscritti di Thomas Reid.” In Filosofia e cultura nel Settecento
britannico, II: Hume e Hutcheson: Reid e la scuola delsenso comune; see Santucci,
ed., 2000.
Ariew, Roger and Eric Watkins, eds. Readings in Modem Philosophy, volume 2:
Locke, Berkeley, Hume andAssociated Texts. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett, 2000.
Aroso, Elisabetta. “Hume, Hutcheson e le due specie di filosofia.” In Filosofia e
cultura nel Settecento britannico, 11:Hume e Hutcheson: Reid e la scuola del senso
comune; see Santucci, ed., 2000.
Ayers, Michael. “Can There be a New Empiricism?” In The Proceedings of the
Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, volume 7: Modern Philosophy; see
Gedney, ed., 2000.
Bagalini, Luigi. “David Hume on Legal Obligation and Sanction” (in Italian). Rivista Internazionale di FilosoPa del Diritto 77.3 (2000): 395-403.
Baier, Annette C. “Hume: The Reflective Woman’s Epistemologist?” In Feminist Interpretations ofDavid Hume; see Jacobson, ed., 2000.
HUMESTUDIES
TheHumeLiterature, 2000
359
Bargeliotes, Leonidas. “David Hume: Universality, Causality, Induction, Uncertainty.” Philosophical Inquiry 22.3 (2000): 83-102.
Baxter, Donald L. M. “Hume’s Puzzle about Identity.” PS 98.2 (2000): 187-201.
. “A Humean Temporal Logic.” In The Proceedings of the Twentieth
World Congress OfPhilosophy, volume 6 :Analytic Philosophy and Logic, edited
by Akihiro Kanamori (Bowling Green, Ohio: Philosophy Documentation
Center, 2000).
Bayne, Steven M. “Kant’s Answer t o Hume: How Kant Should Have Tried to
Stand Hume’s Copy Thesis o n Its Head.” BJHP 8.2 (2000): 207-24.
Beebee, Helen. “The Non-Governing Conception of Laws of Nature.” PPR 61.3
(2000): 571-94.
Beets, F. Review of Fred Wilson, Hume’s Defence of Causal Inference. Dialogue:
Canadian Philosophical Review 39.2 (2000): 404-7.
Bell, Martin. “Hume, Hutcheson e le due specie di filosofia.” In Filosopa e culturu
nel Settecento britannico, 11: Hume e Hutcheson: Reid e la scuola del senso comune;
see Santucci, ed., 2000.
Bertram, R. W. “The Enlightenment That Won’t Go Away: Modernity’s Crux.”
Zygon 35.4 (2000): 919-25.
Biziou, Michael. “Kant et Smith critiques de la philosophie morale de Hume.”
Revue Philosophique de la France et de 1’Etranger 125.4 (2000): 449-64.
Black, R. “Nothing Matters too Much, or Wright Is Wrong.”AnaIysis 60.3
(2000): 229-37.
Blackburn, Simon. “Why We Pull Together-Hume’s Understanding of Habit
and Sentiment in Human Life.” TLS 5056 (2000): 14-15.
Boccara, Nadia. “La riabilitazione dell’interesse personale in Pierre Nicole e
David Hume.” In Filosofia e cultura nel Settecento britannico, I: Fonti e
connessioni continentali John Toland e il deismo; see Santucci, ed., 2000.
Bourke, Richard. “Liberty, Authority, and Trust in Burke’s Idea of Empire.” JHZ
61.3 (2000): 453-71.
Bowlin, J. R. “Sieges, Shipwrecks, and Sensible Knaves: Justice and Utility in
Butler and Hume.” Journal ofReligious Ethics 28.2 (2000): 253-80.
Bradshaw, D. Review of Donald Livingston, Philosophical Melancholy and Delirium: Hume’s Pathology of Philosophy. Southern Humanities Review 34.3
(2000): 263-5.
Branchi, Andrea. “Mandeville e l’onore.” In Filosofia e cultura nel Settecento
britannico, 11:Hume e Hutcheson:Reid e la scuola del senso comune; see Santucci,
ed., 2000.
Volume 27, Number 2, November 2001
360
William Edward Morris
Bruni, Luigino and Robert Sugden. “Moral Canals: Trust and Social Capital
in the Work of Hume, Smith and Genovesi.” Economics and Philosophy
16.1 (2000):21-45.
Bruyere, N. Review of David Hume, Essais et Traites Sur Plusieurs Sujets. Essais
Moraux, Politiques et Litteraires. Revue de Philosophique de la France et de
1’Etranger 125.2 (2000):229-30.
Buckle, Stephen. Review of David Hume, An Enquiry concerning the Principles of
Morals. AJP 78.1 (2000):144-5.
Carter, Alan. “Humean Nature.” Environmental Values 9.1(2000):3-37.
Case-Winters, Anna. “The Argument From Design: What is at Stake Theologically?” Zygon 35.1 (2000):69-81.
Castilla Urbano, Francisco. “Tolerance and Rationality: Limits and Presumption in David Hume’s Analysis of Religion” (in Spanish). Revista deFilosofia
(Venezula) 34.1 (2000):17-44.
Clero, J. P. Review of David Hume, AnEnquiry concerning the Principles ofMorals.
Revue Philosophique de la France a t d e 1’Etranger 125.2(2000):230-1.
Costelloe, Timothy M.Review of Don Garrett, Cognition and Commitment in
Hume’s Philosophy. JHP 38.3 (2000):441-2.
Crooks, Shelagh. “Hume, Images, and the Mental Object Problem.” Dialogue:
Canadian Philosophical Review 39.1 (2000):3-24.
D’Arms, Justin and Daniel Jacobson. “Sentiment and Value.” Ethics 110.4
(2000):722-48.
Dancy, Jonathan, ed. Normativity. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.
Dauer, Francis. “Humean Naturalism and the Problem of Induction.” Ratio
13.2(2000):123-37.
Dicker, Georges. “Regularity, Conditionality, and Asymmetry in Causation.”
In The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress ofPhilosophy, volume 7:
Modern Philosophy; see Gedney, ed., 2000.
Dreyfus, F. “The Art of the Lawgiver. The Natural Jurisprudence of David Hume
and Adam Smith.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de 1’Etranger 125.2
(2000):226-7.
Earman, John. Hume’s AbjectFailure: T h e ArgumentAgainstMiracles. New York:
Oxford University Press, 2000.
Ellis, Brian. “Causal Laws and Singular Causation.” PPR 61.2 (2000):329-51.
Eze, Emmanuel C. “Hume, Race, and Human Nature.” JH161.4(2000):691-8.
Faggiotto, P. “Notes o n the Relations of t h e Idea in Hume and in Kant.”
Verifische 29.3-4(2000):271-6.
HUMESTUDIES
The Hume Literature, 2000
36 1
Fosl, Peter S . “Common Life and Animality in Hume.” In 1650-1850: Ideas,
Aesthetics, and Inquiries in the Early Modem Era, edited by Kevin L. Cope
and Anna Battigelli (New York: AMS, 2000).
Gaiger, Jean. “The True Judge of Beauty and the Paradox of Taste.” European
Journal ofPhilosophy 8.1 (2000): 1-19.
Garrett, Don. Review of Fred Wilson, Hume’s Defence of Causal Inference. JHP
38.1 (2000): 126-8.
Gatt, Luis. “Knowledge and Perception: Some Reflections on Antonioni’s The
Passenger in the Light of Locke, Hume, and Molyneux’s Question.” The
Italianist: Journal of the Department of Italian Studies, University of Reading
20 (2000): 313-30.
Gedney, Mark D., ed. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress ofPhilosophy,
volume 7:Modern Philosophy. Bowling Green, Ohio: Philosophy Documentation Center, 2000.
Green, R. M. Review of Jennifer Herdt, Religion and Faction in Hurne’s Moral
Philosophy. Journal ofReligion 80.3 (2000): 529-31.
Gori, Giambattista. “Da Malebranche a Hume: modelli della mente umana,
immaginazione, giudizi naturali. Un percorso storiografico.” In Filosofia
e cultura nel Settecento britannico, I: Fonti e connessioni continentali John Toland
e il deismo; see Santucci, ed., 2000.
Guerrero del Amo, Jose Antonio. “La naturalizacion de la epistemologia en
Hume.” Revista de Filosofia (Spain) 13.23 (2000): 61-84.
Guicciardini, Niccolo. “Thomas Reid e l’eredita matematica newtoniana.” In
Filosofia e cultura nel Settecento britannico, ZZ: Hume e Hutcheson: Reid e la
scuola del senso comune; see Santucci, ed., 2000.
Gurstein, Rochelle. “Taste and ‘the Conversible World’ in the Eighteenth
Century.” JHZ 61.2 (2000): 203-21.
Harris, James. “Hume’s Reason.” TLS 5085 (2000): 28.
Hepfer, K. Review of Marina Frasca-Spada, Space andself in Hume’s Treatise.Archiv
ftir Geschichte der Philosophie 82.3 (2000): 353-5.
Herdt, Jennifer A. “Superstition and the Timid Sex.” In Feminist Interpretutions ofDavidHume; see Jacobson, ed., 2000.
Hinton, Beverly K. “Is Hume’s Inductive Skepticism Based Upon Rationalistic
Assumptions?” The Modern Schoolman 77.4 (2000): 309-32.
Hirshmann, Nancy J. “Sympathy, Empathy, and Obligation: A Feminist Rereading.” In Feministlnterpretations ofDavidHume; seeJacobson, ed., 2000.
Homiak, Marcia L. “Hume’s Ethics: Ancient or Modern?’’ PPQ 81.3 (2000):
215-36.
Volume 27, Number 2, November 2001
362
William Edward Morris
. “Does Hume Have an Ethics of Virtue? Some Observations on
Character and Reasoning in Hume and Aristotle.” In The Proceedings of
the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, volume 7: Modern Philosophy;
see Gedney, ed., 2000.
Hopkins, Robert. “Beauty and Testimony.” In Philosophy, the Good, the True,
and the Beautiful, edited by Anthony O’Hear. Philosophy, supplementary
volume 47 (2000): 209-36.
Hough, Sheridan. “Humean Androgynes and the Nature of ‘Nature’.” In Feminist Interpretations ofDavid Hume; see Jacobson, ed., 2000.
Imlay, Robert. “Causal Necessity and the Principle of Alternative Possibilities,
‘Sublatacausa tollitur effectus’.” The Modern Schoolman 77.2 (2000):165-8.
Jackson, Jean-Pierre. “Passioni e edizioni nel XXI secolo.” In Filosopa e cultura
nel Settecento britannico, II: HumeeHutcheson: Reid e la scuola del senso comune;
see Santucci, ed., 2000.
Jacobson, Anne Jaap, ed. Feminist Interpretations ofDavid Hume. University Park,
Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2000.
. “Reconceptualizing Reasoning and Writing the Philosophical
Canon: The Case of David Hume.” In FeministInterpretations ofDavid Hume;
see Jacobson, ed., 2000.
Jenkins, Joyce L. and Robert Shaver. “‘Mr. Hobbes Could Have Said No More’.”
In FeministInterpretations ofDavid Hume; see Jacobson, ed., 2000.
Jones, Ward E. “Can We Infer Naturalism from Scepticism?” PQ50.201 (2000):
433-51.
Kemp, Catherine. “Two Meanings of the Term ‘Idea’: Acts and Contents in
Hume’s Treatise.” JHI61.4 (2000): 675-90.
Kern, Andrea. “Philosophie und Skepsis: Hume, Kant, Cavell” Deutsche
Zeitschrift f u r Philosophie 48.1 (2000): 17-35.
Khamara, Edward J . “Hume against Locke on the Causal Principle.” BJHP 8.2
(2000): 339-43.
Klein, L. E. “Reason, Grace and Sentiment.” TLS 5096 (2000): 36.
Knowles, Dudley. “Conservative Utilitarianism.” Utilitas 12.2 (2000): 155-75.
Koons, Robert C.Realism Regained: A n Exact Theory of Causation, Teleology, and
the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Lemmens, W. “Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Hume on Knowledge.”
Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 62.4 (2000): 792.
Lecaldano, Eugenio. “L’Io, il carattere, e la virtu nel Trattato di Hume.” In
Filosofia e cultura nel Settecento britannico, II: Hume e Hutcheson: Reid e la
scuola del senso comune; see Santucci, ed., 2000.
HUMESTUDIES
The Hume Literature, 2000
363
Levi-Mortera, Emanuele. “Linguaggio, conoscenza e progress0 in Dugald
Stewart.” In Filosofia e cultura nel Settecento britannico, II: Hume e Hutcheson:
Reid e la scuola del senso comune; see Santucci, ed., 2000.
Lipton, Peter. “Tracking Track Records.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (2000): 179-205.
Lloyd, Genevieve. “Hume on the Passion for Truth.” In Feminist Interpretations ofDavid Hume; see Jacobson, ed., 2000.
LoLordo, Antonia. “Probability and Skepticism About Reason in Hume’s Treatise.” BJHP 8.3 (2000): 419-46.
Maass, H. “Experience and Categorical Thinking. Hume, Kant and Husserl on
Pre-predicative Experiences and Predicative Consciousness.” Husserl Studies
17.1 (2000): 71-82.
MacBride, Fraser. “On Finite Hume.” Philosophia Mathematica 8.2 (2000): 150-9.
McDermid, Douglas James. “Does Epistemology Rest on a Mistake?” Criticn
32.96 (2000): 3-42.
McIntyre, Jane L. “Le passioni di Hume: dirette e indirette.” In Filosofia e cultura
nel Settecento britannico, 11:Hume e Hutcheson: Reid e la scuola del senso comune;
see Santucci, ed., 2000.
Madell, Geoffrey. Review of David Owen, Hume’s Reason. Philosophy 75 2 9 3
(2000): 452-4.
Manson, Neil A. “Anthropocentrism and the Design Argument.” Religious Studies 36.2 (2000):163-76.
Marshall, M. G. “Luxury, Economic Development, and Work Motivation:
David Hume, Adam Smith, and J. R. McCulloch.” History ofPolitica1 Economy
32.3 (2000): 631-48.
Martin, Marina. “Borges via the Dialectics of Berkeley and Hume.” Variaciones
Borges: Journal of the Jorge Luis Borges Center for Studies and Documentation 9
(2000): 147-62.
Martinelli-Fernandez, Susan A. “Social (Re)Construction: A Humean Voice
on Moral Education, Social Constructions, and Feminism.” In Feminist
Interpretations ofDavid Hume; see Jacobson, ed., 2000.
Masroori, Cyrus. “European Thought in Nineteenth-Century Iran: David Hume
and Others.” JHI 61.4 (2000): 657-74.
Mazza, Emilio. “‘Noncuranza e in-attenzione’. Rimedio e causa dello
scetticismo in Hume e nell’ Art depenser.” In Filosofla e cultura nel Settecento
britannico, 11:Hume e Hutcheson: Reid e la scuola del senso comune; see Santucci,
ed., 2000.
Meeker, Kevin. “Hume’s Iterative Probability Argument: A Pernicious Reductie." JHP 38.2 (2000): 221-38.
Volume 27, Number 2, November 2001
364
William Edward Mom’s
Meikle, M. M. Review of David Reid, ed., DavidHume OfGodscroft’s TheHistory
of the House ofDouglas. English Historical Review 115.461 (2000): 452-3.
Mianone, Maurizio. “Mente e corpo in Thomas Reid.” Zn Filosofia e cultura nel
Settecento britannico, ZZ: Hume e Hutcheson: Reid e la scuola del senso comune;
see Santucci, ed., 2000.
Monteiro, Joao Paulo. “Hume’s Empiricism and the Rationality of Induction.”
In The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress ofPhilosophy, volume 7:
Modern Philosophy; see Gedney, ed., 2000.
Moore, James. “Hume, Hutcheson e i ‘Doveri’ di Cicerone: u n contest0 per la
Enquiry Concerningthe Principles ofMorals.” In FilosoPa e cultura nel Settecento
britannico, II: Hume e Hutcheson: Reid e la scuola del senso comune;” see
Santucci, ed., 2000.
Morris, William Edward. “Hume’s Conclusion.” PS 99.1 (2000): 89-110.
Neri, Luigi. “Filosofia della mente e storia della filosofia in Thomas Reid.” In
Filosofia e cultura nel Settecento britannico, ZZ: Hume e Hutcheson: Reid e la
scuola del senso commune; see Santucci, ed., 2000.
Nuttall, A. D. Review of Isabel Rivers, Reason, Grace, andSentiment:A Study of
the Language ofReligion and Ethics in England, 1600-1780. Review ofEnglish
Studies 51.204 (2000): 647-50.
Oppy, Graham. “‘Humean’Supervenience?” PS 101.1 (2000): 77-105.
Owens, David. “Scepticisms: Descartes and Hume.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (2000): 119-42.
. Reason withoutFreedom: The Problem ofEpistemicNormativity. New
York: Routledge, 2000.
Paez, Andres. “Bayle,Hume y 10sMolinos de Viento.” Zdeasy Valores 113 (2000):
29-43.
Paoletti, Cristina. “Sinestesia e interpretazione dei segni nel pensiero di Thomas Reid.” In Filosofia e cultura nel Settecento britannico, ZZ: HumeeHutcheson:
Reid e la scuola del senso commune; see Santucci, ed., 2000.
Penelhum, Terence. Themes in Hume: The Self, the Will, and Religion. Oxford:
Clarendon Press, 2000.
Piller, Christian. “Doing What Is Best.” In Feminist Interpretations of David
Hume; see Jacobson, ed., 2000.
Pitson, A. E. Review of Christopher Williams, A Cultivated Reason:An Essay on
Hume and Humeanism. P Q 50.198 (2000): 114-16.
. “Hume and the Mind/Body Relation.” HPQ 17.3 (2000): 277-95.
Potkay, Adam. “The Passion for Happiness: Samuel Johnson and David
Hume.” Virginia Quarterly Review 76.4 (2000): 125-26.
HUMESTUDIES
The Hume Literature, 2000
365
.
“‘The Structure of His Sentences is French’: Johnson and Hume
in the History of English.” Language Sciences 22.3 (2000): 285-93.
Railton, Peter. “Normative Force and Normative Freedom: Hume and Kant,
but not Hume ‘versus’ Kant.” In Normativity; see Dancy, ed., 2000.
Rinderle, P. “Reasonableness of Dissent-Hume’s Criticism of Locke’s Doctrine of Tacit Consent.” Philosophisches Jahrbuch 108.2 (2000): 302-19.
Rist,John M. “What Will I Be Like Tomorrow? Augustine Versus Hume.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 74.1 (2000):95-114.
Rosales-Rodriguez, Aman. “David Hume y condiciones de la establidad
politica.” Topicos 19 (2000): 251-74.
Rosen, F. “The Idea of Utility in Adam Smith’s The Theory ofktoral Sentiments.”
History ofEuropean Ideas 26.2 (2000):79-103.
Rosenberg, Alexander. The Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction.
New York: Routledge, 2000.
Rosenberg, Jay F. “Identity and Substance in Hume and Kant.” Topoi 19.2
(2000): 137-45.
Ross, I. Review of David Hume, An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals.
JHP 38.2 (2000): 280-1.
Roth, Abraham Sesshu. “What Was Hume’s Problem with Personal Identity?”
PPR 61.1 (2000): 91-114.
Rysiew, Patrick. “Testimony, Simulation, and the Limits of Inductivism.”A p
78.2 (2000): 269-74.
Salmeron, Fernando. Ensayos de filosofia moderna y contemporunea. Coyoacan:
Univ Nac de Mexico, 2000.
Santucci, Antonio, ed. Filosofia e cultura nel Settecento britannico, I: Fonti e
connessioni continentali:John Toland e il deismo. Bologna: I1 Mulino, 2000.
. Filosofla e cultura nel Settecento britannico, II: Hume e Hutcheson:
Reid e la scuola del senso commune. Bologna: I1 Mulino, 2000.
. “Thomas Reid e l’identita personale.” In Filosofia e cultura nel
Settecento britannico, II: Hume eHutcheson: Reid e la scuola del senso commune;
see Santucci, ed., 2000.
Schaffer, Jonathan. “Causation by Disconnection.” Philosophy of Science 67.2
(2000): 285-300.
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter. “From ‘Is’ to ‘Ought’ in Moral Epistemology.”
Argumentation 14.2 (2000): 159-74.
Smuts, Aaron A. “The Metaphorics of Hume’s Gendered Skepticism.” In FeministInterpretations ofDavid Hume; see Jacobson, ed., 2000.
Volume 27, Number 2, November 2001
366
William EdwardMom‘s
Squillante, Martino. “Fisica e metafisica della causalita in Thomas Reid.” In
Filosofia e cultura nel Settecento britannico, ZZ: Hume e Hutcheson: Reid e la
scuola del senso commune; see Santucci ,ed., 2000.
Stewart, M. A. “William Wishart e le controversie del suo tempo (e in
appendice quattro lettere inedite di W. Wishart).” In Filosofia e cultura nel
Settecen to britannico, ZZ: Hume e Hutcheson: Reid e la scuola del senso commune;
see Santucci , ed., 2000.
Swanton, Christine. “Compassion as a Virtue in Hume.” In Feministlnterpretations ofDavid Hume; see Jacobson, ed., 2000.
Sweet, William. “Introduction: The Bases of Ethics and Ethical Foundationalism.” In his The Bases of Ethics (Milwaukee, Wis.: Marquette University
Press, 2000).
Tabata, H. “Frege’sTheorem and His Logicism.” History andPhilosophy ofLogic
21.4 (2000): 265-95.
Taylor, Jacqueline. “Hume and the Reality of Value.” In Feminist Znterpretations ofDavid Hume; see Jacobson, ed., 2000.
Tiberius, Valerie. “Humean Heroism: Value Commitments and the Source of
Normativity.” PPQ 81.4 (2000): 426-46.
Temple, Kathryn. “‘Manly Composition’: Hume and the History of England.”
In Feministlnterpretations ofDavidHume; see Jacobson, ed., 2000.
Tropea, Savina. “L’occhio a1 centro della sfera: la Geometria dei visibili di Thomas Reid e Msironomy di David Gregory.” In Filosofia e cultura nel Settecento
britannico, 11: Hume e Hutcheson: Reid e la scuola del senso commune; see
Santucci , ed., 2000.
Turco, Luigi. “Hutcheson, Hume e la simpatia: le obiezioni e le risposte.” In
Filosofia e cultura nel Settecento britannico, ZZ: Hume e Hutcheson: Reid e la
scuola del senso commune. See Santucci ,ed., 2000.
Valor-Yebenes,Juan Antonio. “El empirismo y su metodo.” Revista de Filosofia
(Spain) 13.23 (2000): 129-68.
Vermeule, B. Review of Adam Potkay, ThePassion forHappiness: Samuel Johnson
and David Hume. Wordsworth Circle 31.4 (2000):190-1.
Vickers, John M. “I Believe It, but Soon I’ll Not Believe It Any More: Scepticism, Empiricism, and Reflection.” Synthese 124.2 (2000): 155-74.
Vitz, Paul C. “The Psychology of Atheism.” In Theos, Anthropos, Christos: A
Compendium of Modern Philosophical Theology, edited by Roy Abraham
Varghese (New York: Peter Lang, 2000).
White, Morton. “The Ideas of the Enlightenment and Their Legacy: The
Psychologism of Hume and Quine Compared.” Zn T h e Proceedings of the
HUME STUDIES
The Hume Literature, 2000
367
Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, volume 7: Modern Philosophy; see
Gedney, ed., 2000.
Williams, Christopher. “False Delicacy.” In Feminist Interpretations of David
Hume; see Jacobson, ed., 2000.
Wood, Paul. “Chi era Thomas Reid?” In Filosofia e cultura nel Settecento britannico,
II: Hume e Hutcheson: Reide la scuola del senso commune; see Santucci ,ed., 2000.
Wooley, R. “Strange Fits of Passion.” Keats-Shelley Review 14 (2000):107-10.
Worrall, John. “Relying on Meta-Induction?” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (2000): 207-35.
Wright, John P. “Due culture mediche dell’Illuminismo: epicurei pagani e stoici
cristiane.” (in English) In Filosofia e cultura nel Settecento britannico, II: Hume
e Hutcheson: Reid e la scuola del senso commune; see Santucci, ed., 2000.
Doctoral Dissertations, 2000
Beardman, Stephanie. Afective Deliberation: Toward a Humean Account ofPractica1
Reasons. Rutgers The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick, 2000.
Boehnen, Scott Edward. The Ethics of Performance in Shelley’s “The Cenci.”
Stanford University, 2000.
Dwyer, Karen. Joanna BailliePlays the Passions: Literature, Science and Medicine.
University of Notre Dame, 2000.
Eng, David. A n Account oftheJustifZcation of Testimonial Beliefs: A Reliabilist Approach. The Ohio State University, 2000.
Glenn, Sarah E. Relations andReality: The Metaphysics ofparts and Wholes. Boston College, 2000.
Han, Churlhee. Indwelling Knowledge: A Reinterpretation of the Knower and the
Known Focused on a Holistic Epistemology with Implications for Evangelical Christian Education. The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, 2000.
Jager, Colin Lovell. Natural Designs: Skepticism, Romanticism, and Religion fiom
Hume to Austen. The University o f Michigan, 2000.
Kline, William, Jr. Stability, Convention and the Sensible Knave: The Foundations
ofHume’s Theory offustice. Bowling Green State University, 2000.
Meyer, Christopher Charles. The Experience of Habit: Empiricism, Subjectivity,
Literature, and Addiction. University o f California-Irvine, 2000.
Petersson, Bjorn. Belief and Desire: The Standard Model oflntentional Action. Critique and Defence. Lund University (Sweden), 2000.
Riker, Stephen E. The Skepticism of Nicolaus of Autrecourt: A Forgotten Type of
Skepticism. The Catholic University of America, 2000.
Volume 27, Number 2, November 2001
368
William EdwardMom‘s
Schoonhoven, Richard D. Explaining Causation: Towards a Humean Theory of
Scientific Explanation and Causation. The University of Michigan, 2000.
Sibbitt, David. Hume’s Aesthetic Principles. State University of New YorkBinghamton, 2000.
Taylor, James Stacey. Personal Autonomy: Its Theoretical Foundations and Role in
Applied Ethics. Bowling Green State University, 2000.
Turiano, Mark Vincent. Participation and Transcendence in Hume’s Political Philosophy. Emory University, 2000.
Valihora, Karen. A Genealogy of Common Sense: Judgment in Eighteenth-Century
Literature and Philosophy. Yale University, 2000.
Yenor, Scott Edward. The Moral Sciences ofJohnLocke and David Hume. Loyola
University of Chicago, 2000
Additions to Doctoral Dissertations, 1999
Baker, Shaun David. Kant’s Copernican Theory ofself-Consciousness. Wayne State
University, 1999.
Hendricks, John Lawrence. David Hume’s Critique of Religion and Its Irnplications for Contemporary Theology. University of Chicago, 1999.
Merritt, Maria Weston. VirtueEthics and the Social Psychology of Character. University of California-Berkeley, 1999.
NOTE
I have been helped in compiling this bibliography by the diligent work of my research assistants Alexis Wakefield and David Zofeld. It is also a pleasure to
acknowledge the assistance of Regina Linsalata, Secretary to the Department of
Philosophy at Illinois Wesleyan University.
HUMESTUDIES