DIPCO N. 16 (internet) - Ministero degli Affari Esteri

BOLLETTINO SETTIMANALE
DEL MINISTERO DEGLI AFFARI ESTERI
REGISTRAZIONE DEL TRIBUNALE DI ROMA
n° 271/84 del 4.7.1984
Poste Italiane S.p.A. Spedizione in abbonamento postale
D.L. 353/2003 (conv. in L. 27/02/2004 n. 46)
art. 1 comma 1 DCB - ROMA
Taxe perçue - Tassa pagata - Roma-Italy - Ordinario
DIRETTORE RESPONSABILE: ORIETTA PROFILI
CAPO REDATTORE: ROSSELLA BOVO
REDAZIONE: ISABELLA SERMONTI
ANNO XXV
N. 16
24 APRILE 2008
SOMMARIO
DOCUMENTI
GARE/AVVISI
ORGANIZZAZIONE DELLA DGCS
OECD-DAC: Development Aid in 2007
IMF-WB: Development Committee
Global Monitoring Report 2008
Avvisi di gara Nicaragua e Macedonia
pag. 331-362
pag.
77-80
I testi di “Dipco” possono essere pubblicati parzialmente o integralmente citando la fonte.
Le opinioni espresse nei documenti pubblicati non rispecchiano necessariamente il punto di vista del Ministero degli Affari Esteri.
Il bollettino “Dipco” può essere consultato su Internet ai seguenti indirizzi:
http://www.cooperazioneallosviluppo.esteri.it/pdgcs/italiano/Pubblicazioni/Dipco/Dipco.asp
http://www.esteri.it/MAE/IT/ministero/servizi/italiani/opportunita/Nella_Coop_Svil/
Documenti
OECD-DAC
Debt Relief is down: Other ODA rises slightly
04/04/2008 - The 22 member countries of the OECD Development Assistance Committee,
the world’s major donors, provided USD 103.7 billion in aid in 2007.
The 2007 outturn reflects:
• the end of exceptionally high levels of debt relief (notably for Iraq and Nigeria)
• a small increase in other official development assistance.
Overall, most donors are not on track to meet their stated commitments to scale up aid and
will need to make unprecedented increases to meet the targets they have set for 2010.
Total ODA in 2007
With the end of exceptionally high debt relief, total official development assistance (ODA)
from members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) fell by 8.4% in real terms in
2007 to USD 103.7 billion, according to provisional data reported by members. This represents a
drop from 0.31% of members’ combined gross national income in 2006 to 0.28% in 2007 (see
Table 1 and Chart 1).
The fall was expected. ODA had been exceptionally high in 2005 (USD 107.1 billion) and
2006 (USD 104.4 billion), due to large Paris Club debt relief operations for Iraq and Nigeria.
Debt relief grants diminished in 2007 to USD 8.7 billion as the Paris Club operations tapered off
(see Table 2).
Excluding debt relief grants, DAC members’ net ODA rose by 2.4%.
Bilateral aid to sub-Saharan Africa, excluding debt relief, increased by 10% in real terms.
This represents an improvement on the recent rate of increase. But it is clear that donors still
face a real challenge to meet the Gleneagles G-8 summit projection to double aid to Africa by
2010.
Donor performance
The largest donors in 2007, by volume, were the United States, followed by Germany,
France, the United Kingdom and Japan. The only countries to exceed the United Nations target
of 0.7% of GNI were Denmark, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden.
In 2007, net ODA by the United States was USD 21.8 billion, representing a fall of 9.9 % in
real terms. Its ODA/GNI ratio fell to 0.16%. This fall was mostly due to debt relief, which was
high in 2006, and a reduction in ODA to Iraq. Excluding debt relief, there was an increase in
ODA to sub-Saharan Africa (+4.4% in real terms to USD 4.5 billion) and the Least Developed
Countries (+4.0% to USD 4.8 billion). ODA to Afghanistan increased (+11.7% to USD 1.6 billion)
and remained important to Iraq (-25.5% to USD 3.7 billion). The United States’ ODA to fight
HIV/AIDS increased by 26.1% to USD 3.4 billion.
Japan’s net ODA was USD 7.7 billion, representing 0.17% of GNI. The 30.1% fall in real
terms was in part due to a decrease in debt relief operations, which were exceptionally high in
331
Dipco n. 16/2008
2005 and 2006, and to a decrease in contributions to international financial institutions. Japan’s
ODA has been on a downward trend since 2000, except for an increase in 2005 and 2006 due
to debt relief.
The combined ODA of the fifteen members of the DAC that are EU members – which
represents 60% of all DAC ODA – fell by 5.8% in real terms to USD 62.1 billion, representing
0.40% of their combined GNI. The fall was mainly due to a decrease in debt relief grants.
Excluding these, net ODA from DAC EU members rose by 8.8%.
Aid rose in real terms in nine DAC EU countries as follows:
• Germany (+5.9%), reflecting an increase in bilateral aid and contributions to international
organisations;
• Ireland (+4.6%), maintaining its ODA/GNI ratio at 0.54% despite the strong increase in
Irish GNI;
• Luxembourg (+11.7%), due to the general scaling up of its aid;
• Spain (+33.8%), mainly due to a rise in its multilateral contributions, within a planned
process of sustained scaling-up of its aid;
• Austria (+7.6%), Denmark (+2.9%), Finland (+5.5%), Greece (+5.3%) and the Netherlands
(+3.1%) also increased their aid.
Aid from many DAC EU countries fell in real terms, due mainly to decreased debt relief:
Belgium (11.2%), France (-15.9%), Italy (-3.6%), Portugal (-9.4%), Sweden (-2.6%) and the
United Kingdom (29.1%). Excluding debt relief (see Table 2), aid rose in these countries with
the exception of Portugal and the United Kingdom (where net ODA decreased slightly due to
sales of equity investments).
Net ODA by the European Commission rose by 3% to USD 11.8 billion mainly due to
increased programme and project aid. Humanitarian aid also increased, and the EC’s
disbursement capacity continued to improve.
ODA from other DAC countries rose or fell from 2006 to 2007 as follows:
• Australia (+1.0%) as increased bilateral ODA offset the return to normal levels of debt relief;
• Canada (-2.7%), due to a fall in contributions to multilateral organisations as well as
reduced debt relief;
• New Zealand (+3.7%);
• Norway (+13.4%), in large part due to increased equity investment;
• Switzerland (-3.0%), due to a lower volume of debt relief.
The following non-DAC economies also reported changes in net ODA as follows:
• Chinese Taipei (-7.6%);
• Czech Republic (-3.6%);
• Hungary (-49.9%);
• Iceland (-6.5%);
• Korea (+42.8%), as contributions to international organisations rose;
• Latvia (+23.4%);
• Lithuania (+74.8%), due to increased assistance to Afghanistan and contributions to the EC;
• Poland (+3.2%);
• Slovak Republic (+0.6%).
On a gross basis (i.e. without deducting loan repayments), ODA was USD 116.5 billion,
with the United States (USD 22.6 billion), Germany (USD 13.8 billion), Japan (USD 13.6 billion),
the United Kingdom (USD 11.8 billion) and France (USD 11.6 billion) accounting for 63% of the
total (see Table 3).
Future ODA prospects
At the Gleneagles G8 and UN Millennium +5 summits in 2005, donors committed to
increase their aid. The pledges made at these summits, combined with other commitments,
implied lifting aid from USD 80 billion in 2004 to USD 130 billion in 2010 (at constant 2004
prices). While a few countries have slightly reduced their targets since 2005, the majority of
Dipco n. 16/2008
332
these commitments remain in force. Chart 2 shows the history of ODA levels since 1990 and the
steep increase still required for donors’ current, somewhat reduced, commitments to be met.
Chart 3 gives a simplified view of progress since 2004, compared with the original 2005 targets
for ODA in 2010. This chart shows that ODA has only risen at half the rate required to meet the
original targets.
Overall, most donors are not on track to meet their stated commitments to scale up aid;
they will need to make unprecedented increases to meet their 2010 targets. The OECD has
completed the first comprehensive survey of donors’ future spending plans to 2010 and the
results will be published early in May. While the findings are still to be finalised, the preliminary
conclusions that emerge are that donors have programmed around an additional USD 11 billion
so far into their planned annual spending by 2010, on top of the extra USD 5 billion for country
programmes that they delivered in 2005. This shows that efforts to increase aid are being
factored into some donors’ forward plans, but it still leaves about USD 34 billion in 2004 dollars
– about USD 38 billion in 2007 dollars – to be programmed into donor budgets if the
commitments made in 2005 to substantially increase aid by 2010 are to be fully met.
333
Dipco n. 16/2008
Table 1: Net Official Development Assistance in 2007
Preliminary data for 2007
2007
ODA
USD million
2006
ODA/GNI
%
current
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Ireland
Italy
Japan
Luxembourg
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Portugal
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom
United States
TOTAL DAC
2007
ODA/GNI
%
current
2 471
1 798
1 953
3 922
2 563
973
9 940
12 267
501
1 190
3 929
7 691
365
6 215
315
3 727
403
5 744
4 334
1 680
9 921
21 753
0.30
0.49
0.43
0.28
0.81
0.40
0.39
0.37
0.16
0.54
0.19
0.17
0.90
0.81
0.27
0.95
0.19
0.41
0.93
0.37
0.36
0.16
103 655
0.28
Average Country Effort
ODA
USD million
2
1
1
3
2
0.30
0.47
0.50
0.29
0.80
0.40
0.47
0.36
0.17
0.54
0.20
0.25
0.84
0.81
0.27
0.89
0.21
0.32
1.02
0.39
0.51
0.18
104 421
0.31
1
3
11
5
2
3
3
1
12
23
0.45
Percent change
2006 to 2007 (1)
At 2006 prices and exchange rates
123
498
978
684
236
834
601
435
424
022
641
187
291
452
259
954
396
814
955
646
459
532
10
10
ODA
USD million (1)
2
1
1
3
2
145
613
756
585
302
880
918
048
446
068
509
824
325
621
268
349
359
103
853
596
839
197
1.0
7.6
-11.2
-2.7
2.9
5.5
-15.9
5.9
5.3
4.6
-3.6
-30.1
11.7
3.1
3.7
13.4
-9.4
33.8
-2.6
-3.0
-29.1
-9.9
95 605
-8.4
10 556
3.0
8
11
1
3
7
5
3
5
3
1
8
21
0.46
Memo Items:
EC
11 771
DAC-EU countries
62 095
0.40
59 035
0.43
55 639
-5.8
G7 countries
69 422
0.23
75 539
0.27
64 919
-14.1
Non-G7 countries
34 232
0.52
28 882
0.51
30 685
6.2
514
179
91
45
672
16
47
356
68
0.13
0.11
0.07
0.25
0.07
0.06
0.11
0.09
0.09
513
161
149
41
455
12
25
297
55
0.14
0.12
0.13
0.27
0.05
0.06
0.08
0.09
0.10
474
155
75
39
650
15
44
306
55
-7.6
-3.6
-49.9
-6.5
42.8
23.4
74.8
3.2
0.6
Non-DAC economies:
Chinese Taipei
Czech Republic
Hungary
Iceland
Korea
Latvia
Lithuania
Poland
Slovak Republic
10 245
(1) Taking account of both inflation and exchange rate movements.
Note: The data for 2007 are preliminary pending detailed final data to be published in December 2008. The data are standardised on
a calendar year basis for all donors, and so may differ from fiscal year data available in countries’ budget documents.
Source: OECD, 4 April 2008.
Dipco n. 16/2008
334
Chart 1. Net Official Development Assistance in 2007
335
Dipco n. 16/2008
Table 2. Share of Debt Relief Grants in Net Official Development Assistance
Preliminary data for 2007
2007
ODA
USD million
current
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Ireland
Italy
Japan
Luxembourg
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Portugal
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom
United States
471
798
953
922
563
973
940
267
501
190
929
691
365
215
315
727
403
744
334
680
921
753
12
919
185
15
123
1 505
2 868
570
1 576
392
61
1
243
75
59
70
29
103 655
8 701
EC
11 771
DAC-EU countries
ODA
USD million
current
15.6
6.3
0.6
4.3
3.2
5.5
5.6
9.8
5.3
4.6
46.7
-24.0
11.7
2.5
3.7
12.4
-9.4
47.6
3.4
-0.5
-2.0
-3.5
104 421
18 874
2.4
-
10 245
-
3.0
62 095
6 949
59 035
13 629
8.8
G7 countries
69 422
6 632
75 539
16 102
-1.1
Non-G7 countries
34 232
2 069
28 882
2 772
10.4
9
12
1
3
7
6
3
5
4
1
9
21
2
1
1
3
2
10
10
1
3
11
5
2
3
3
1
12
23
123
498
978
684
236
834
601
435
424
022
641
187
291
452
259
954
396
814
955
646
459
532
Percent change
of which:
Without debt relief grants
Debt relief grants
2006 to 2007 (1)
277
757
396
260
113
433
722
596
003
312
0
23
0
503
292
98
503
585
TOTAL DAC
2
1
1
3
2
2006
of which:
Debt relief grants
3
2
1
3
3
1
Memo Items:
(1) Taking account of both inflation and exchange rate movements.
Source: OECD, 4 April 2008.
Dipco n. 16/2008
336
Table 3: Gross Official Development Assistance in 2007
Preliminary data for 2007
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Ireland
Italy
Japan
Luxembourg
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Portugal
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom
United States
TOTAL DAC
2007
ODA
USD million
current
2006
ODA
USD million
current
2 471
1 813
2 012
3 959
2 667
973
11 556
13 807
501
1 190
4 231
13 578
365
6 607
315
3 727
396
5 947
4 334
1 687
11 759
22 634
2 123
1 510
2 047
3 730
2 315
838
12 764
12 049
424
1 022
4 003
17 115
291
5 889
259
2 954
402
4 160
3 955
1 657
13 075
24 532
116 528
2007
ODA
Percent change
USD million (1)
2006 to 2007 (1)
At 2006 prices and exchange rates
2
1
1
3
2
145
627
809
619
395
880
367
434
446
068
779
813
325
975
268
349
353
283
853
603
476
056
1.0
7.7
-11.6
-3.0
3.5
5.1
-18.8
3.2
5.3
4.6
-5.6
-19.3
11.7
1.5
3.7
13.4
-12.2
27.0
-2.6
-3.3
-19.9
-10.1
117 112
107 924
-7.8
10
12
1
3
13
5
3
5
3
1
10
22
Memo Items included in the above:
EC
12 182
10 678
10 924
2.3
DAC-EU countries
68 157
64 743
61 071
-5.7
G7 countries
81 523
87 267
76 545
-12.3
Non-G7 countries
35 004
29 845
31 379
5.1
(1) Taking account of both inflation and exchange rate movements.
Source: OECD, 4 April 2008.
337
Dipco n. 16/2008
Chart 2. DAC Members’ net ODA 1990-2007 and DAC Secretariat
simulations to 2010
Chart 3. Performance against 2005 Gleneagles ODA Projection
Note: This chart does not show actual ODA figures for 2005 and 2006 which were affected by exceptional debt relief.
Dipco n. 16/2008
338
International Monetary Fund - World Bank
Development Committee
Joint Ministerial Committee
of the
Boards of Governors of the Bank and the Fund
on the
Transfer of Real Resources to Developing Countries
Development Committee Communiqué
Washington, DC, April 13, 2008
1. We met in Washington, DC today, Sunday, April 13, 2008.
2. We endorsed the overall World Bank Group (WBG) objective of contributing to an
inclusive and sustainable globalization – to overcome poverty, and enhance growth with care
for the environment. We welcomed the process underway to develop further and refine a
results-oriented strategic framework, and look forward to reviewing progress at our next
meeting. In this regard, we look forward to the results of the strategic review of IBRD capital
and progress on deploying capital more effectively for development impact. We also reiterated
the importance of ongoing efforts to strengthen synergy among, and decentralization of, the
WBG institutions. We gave special focus in our own discussions to the WBG’s role in the
poorest countries and in fragile situations and post-conflict states.
3. We reviewed progress toward the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), as reflected
in the fifth Global Monitoring Report. The world is on course for the goal of halving the
percentage of people living in poverty, thanks to strong and sustained growth. Yet progress has
been uneven across countries and sectors. Despite improved growth performance, most SubSaharan African countries are off track to meet the MDGs. Stronger, sustainable and more
equitable growth remains central to more effective poverty reduction. We urged donors,
including the WBG, to increase their support for the poorest countries’ own development
priorities. As the MDG midpoint, 2008 is a crucial year for generating the necessary momentum
towards the MDGs.
4. Progress has been made on human development-related MDGs, but the risks of falling
short are far greater than for the income poverty goal. We called for improving access to – and
quality and effectiveness of – health and education services in low and middle income countries
and for policy interventions to take into account the strong links between health and education
outcomes, nutrition, water and sanitation, and environmental factors, e.g. pollution and climate
change. The challenge of malnutrition is heightened by the rise in food prices. We welcomed
the progress made so far under the WBG Gender Action Plan. We stressed the need to treat the
advancement of girls and women’s economic empowerment as central development issues.
5. While the balance of risks to the global outlook has become more negative, emerging
and developing economies have so far been less affected by financial market developments.
The impact of higher commodity prices is mixed across countries depending on whether they
are net importers or exporters. Within countries, large groups of poor people are severely
affected by high food and energy prices across the developing world. We asked the WBG and
the Fund to respond to developing countries’ requests for advice on management of natural
resource revenues, and to be ready to provide timely policy and financial support to vulnerable
countries dealing with negative shocks including from energy and food prices. We welcomed
the call by the World Bank President to the world community to combat hunger and
339
Dipco n. 16/2008
malnutrition through a “New Deal for Global Food Policy”, combining immediate assistance
with medium and long-term efforts to boost agricultural productivity in developing countries.
We urged donors to provide the needed assistance to the World Food Program to enable
immediate support for countries most affected by the high food prices, and encouraged the
WBG to strengthen its engagement in the agricultural sector.
6. Fragile situations and post conflict states pose special challenges. We asked the Bank,
within its mandate, to promote better global understanding of fragility and conflict dynamics
and of effective strategic and operational approaches. We emphasized the importance of strong
WBG collaboration with international and local partners for effective economic support to
peace-building transitions, institution building and governance reforms, progress towards MDGs
and private sector development. A flexible approach, a stronger field presence by the Bank and
innovative and timely technical and financial support will be crucial for success. Developing
countries can also play a role in this respect through trade, regional integration and South-South
cooperation.
7. Increased and more effective aid remains critical. We welcomed the successful IDA 15
replenishment which yielded an unprecedented 36% increase in donors’ contribution and an
overall envelope that will exceed $ 40 billion. We called for IDA to continue its crucial platform
role in the evolving aid architecture. Many recipient countries have benefited from debt relief
and improved the effectiveness with which they utilize ODA. Yet there are concerns that the
growth path of overall aid volumes may not be consistent with existing commitments. We
therefore agreed on the urgency of achieving international aid commitments, and called on
those who have not done so to deliver on their commitments, including the doubling of aid to
Sub-Saharan Africa by 2010. More needs to be done to implement the principles of aid
effectiveness, including greater focus on results, embodied in the Paris Declaration. This is all
the more important as the international aid architecture becomes increasingly diversified and
complex, with more donors, the potential for increased volume as well as fragmentation of aid,
and increased earmarking through vertical approaches. We recognized the role of South-South
cooperation in leveraging resources and development knowledge. We called on all suppliers of
development assistance to provide aid in line with the country-based model for improving the
effectiveness and transparency of aid, as well as with the debt sustainability framework, which
should be subject to regular review. We look forward to the Accra High Level Forum to advance
this agenda.
8. We strongly support intensified and decisive efforts to agree on an ambitious prodevelopment Doha Round that improves access to markets. We stressed the need to integrate
trade and competitiveness within national development strategies, while stepping up support
for Aid for Trade, including assistance for countries’ efforts to strengthen trade logistics and
ensure competitive access to services, as these are central to improving poor countries’
competitiveness and ability to benefit from trade opportunities.
9. Noting progress in implementing the WBG Middle Income Countries strategy, we
welcomed recent changes and ongoing innovations in the WBG’s financial and lending
products. We urged the Bank to enhance the use of country systems where appropriate, and to
make further progress in simplifying and reducing the non-financial cost of doing business
without diluting essential environmental and social safeguards.
10. We welcomed the steady implementation of the WBG’s Governance and Anticorruption
Strategy. We look forward to full implementation of the Volcker Report recommendations to
strengthen transparency and internal governance, project integrity, effectiveness against
corruption, cooperation with partners, and learning from experience.
11. We welcomed the Concept and Issues Note on the Strategic Framework on Climate
Change and Development for the WBG (SFCCD). We stressed the importance of the WBG
addressing climate change issues, in the overall context of its core mission of promoting
economic growth and poverty reduction. We also underscored the cross-cutting nature of
Dipco n. 16/2008
340
climate change, which requires an integrated approach across many sectors. We acknowledged
the important and catalytic role of the WBG in the financial architecture on climate change and
its experience in carbon finance. We asked for the SFCCD to elaborate further on the additional
financing needs for addressing climate change, the mobilization of private sector funding and
the complementarities between existing and new financing mechanisms. We emphasized that
financial resources for the climate change agenda must be additional to the present levels of
ODA. Noting the primacy of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
negotiation process, we also asked that the SFCCD further articulate the proposed role of the
WBG under a division of labor vis-à-vis the UN, and other key international players, including
the private sector. Recognizing that access to energy remains key to development, we supported
WBG goals of promoting clean technology and renewable energy deployment, technology
transfer, and research and development. We acknowledged the work underway on the design,
governance, and financing of the new Climate Investment Funds, including the Clean
Technology Fund, to address the challenge of climate change. We welcomed the ongoing
consultative process for developing a client0oriented SFCCD and look forward to discussing it at
our next meeting.
12. We welcomed the Managing Director’s report on the reform of IMF quota and voice.
We encouraged the Bank to advance work on all aspects of voice and participation, keeping in
mind the distinct nature of the Bank’s development mandate, and the importance of enhancing
voice and participation for all developing and transition countries in the WBG. We look forward
to a process that is inclusive and consultative among shareholders, and to receiving concrete
options from the Bank’s Board by our next meeting with a view to reaching consensus on a
comprehensive package by the 2009 Spring meeting.
13. The Committee’s next meeting is scheduled for October 12, 2008 in Washington, DC.
341
Dipco n. 16/2008
Nelle pagine 342-362 sono inoltre riportati stralci del Global Monitoring Report 2008
redatto dallo staff della World Bank e dell’Imf (http://www.worldbank.org).
Dipco n. 16/2008
342-362
Avvisi
Avviso di gara
Nicaragua
Gara d’appalto pubblica n. 001/2008
Esecuzione della componente socioeconomica,
(componente n. 2) del progetto:
Potenziamento del sistema di raccolta e gestione dei rifiuti solidi
e miglioramento delle condizioni di vita della popolazione di Managua
La Direzione Acquisti del Municipio di Managua incaricata di pianificare, amministrare ed
eseguire le procedure concorsuali, secondo la legge n. 622 “Ley de Contrataciones Municipales”,
invita le persone giuridiche, iscritte nel “Registro Central de Proveedores del Estado de la Dirección General de Contrataciones del Ministerio de Hacienda y Crédito Público” (Ministero delle
Finanze), interessate a presentare offerte sigillate per la gara d’appalto in oggetto.
1. Questa gara è finanziata con i fondi donati dal Governo italiano. Possono partecipare
unicamente Ong italiane e nicaraguensi consorziate secondo la legge del Nicaragua e ivi registrate e riconosciute.
2. Oggetto della gara d’appalto: migliorare la qualità della vita della popolazione di Managua nel suo insieme, e in particolare le condizioni ambientali, igienico-sanitarie e socioeconomiche della popolazione del distretto VI della città attraverso un’adeguata gestione dei rifiuti solidi;
riduzione del lavoro infantile e creazione di microimprese.
3. Il tempo d’esecuzione di questo contratto non potrà essere superiore a due anni.
4. Gli offerenti potranno acquistare i documenti di gara “Pliego de Bases y Condiciones” negli uffici preposti alle riscossioni, c/o il Centro civico Módulo “E”, depositando la somma di dollari Usa 100, non rimborsabili, nei giorni dal 15 aprile al 25 aprile dell’anno 2008, dalle 8,00 fino
alle ore 17,00. Tali documenti verranno consegnati dietro presentazione della ricevuta di versamento rilasciata dall’Ufficio cassa della “Unidad de Adquisiciones”.
5. Gli offerenti potranno ritirare il plico dal 15 aprile al 25 aprile del 2008, il giorno successivo a quello di presentazione della ricevuta di versamento rilasciata dall’Ufficio cassa a nome
dell’offerente interessato, negli uffici della “Unidad de Adquisiciones”. Al fine di ricevere opportuna informazione dell’esistenza di Chiarimenti relativi alla gara, l’interessato dovrà rilasciare i
propri recapiti utili affinché possa essere agevolmente contattato dall’ente appaltante e presentarsi a questi uffici nel più breve tempo possibile nel periodo indicato. L’ente appaltante è sollevato da qualsiasi responsabilità nel caso dovesse risultare infruttuosa la comunicazione con l’offerente al momento di essere contattato attraverso i recapiti comunicati dal medesimo, provocando il mancato ritiro nel momento stabilito c/o gli uffici competenti dei chiarimenti riferiti alla
gara, e qualora ne consegua una presentazione dell’offerta in maniera incompleta o la mancata
presentazione della stessa. Gli interessati che acquistino i documenti di gara nella data del 25
aprile 2008 dovranno farlo prima delle ore 12,00 am. In questo caso i documenti saranno consegnati il giorno successivo.
77
Dipco n. 16/2008
6. Gli interessati potranno trovare i documenti di gara nella pagina web di Nicaragua Compra (http://www.nicaraguacompra.gob.ni) e www.managua.gob.ni, o negli uffici della “Dirección de Adquisiciones”, situati nel “Centro civico, Módulo C, Planta Alta Puerta n. 105”, dalle
ore 8,00 alle 12,00 e dalle ore 13,00 alle ore 17,00 (ora locale in Nicaragua). Nelle suddette pagine web si pubblicheranno tutti quegli emendamenti e i quesiti ai documenti di gara che dovessero derivare dal procedimento di gara relativamente alla richiesta di chiarimenti e alle risposte
formulate. Il Comitato di gara risponderà unicamente alle richieste di chiarimenti degli offerenti
che abbiano acquisito il diritto di partecipazione e che lo abbiano notificato alla “Dirección Unidad de Adquisiciones”, provvedendo a comunicare per iscritto gli emendamenti o chiarimenti
che siano stati emessi. Comunque sia, ricade sugli interessati l’onere di consultare su tali pagine
web le eventuali variazioni apportate ai documenti di gara. L’ente appaltante non sarà responsabile per la mancanza di collegamento ai predetti siti o per le deficienze degli apparati informatici che impediscano l’accesso ai documenti della presente gara.
7. Gli interessati potranno assistere a una riunione informativa che si terrà il giorno 25 aprile alle ore 10,00 (ora locale) nell’auditorio Miguel De Larreynaga, ubicato di fronte all’Ufficio del
sig. Sindaco di Managua.
8. Le disposizioni contenute nei documenti di gara hanno la loro base legale nella legge
n. 622, “Ley de Contrataciones Municipales” e nel decreto n. 109/2007.
9. Le consultazioni e le richieste di chiarimenti relative al “Pliego de Bases y Condiciones”
saranno ricevute per iscritto negli orari d’ufficio a partire dal giorno 15 aprile fino al giorno 25
aprile dalle 8,00 alle 17,00, presso la Direzione acquisti, e dovranno essere indirizzate all’attenzione del “Comité de Licitación” (Comitato di gara).
10. Le offerte dovranno essere redatte in lingua spagnola. Si stabilisce come data di scadenza per la ricezione delle offerte il giorno 27 maggio 2008, alle 9,45 della mattina (ora locale).
11. L’atto di apertura delle offerte tecniche si effettuerà il giorno 27 maggio 2008, alle 10,00
nell’auditorium Miguel De Larreynaga, e le offerte saranno aperte in presenza del Comitato di
gara, degli offerenti o loro rappresentanti che desiderino partecipare.
12. La valuta nella quale deve presentarsi l’offerta è l’euro.
13. L’atto di apertura delle offerte economiche si effettuerà il giorno 2 giugno 2008, alle ore
14,00, nell’auditorium Miguel De Larreynaga, alla presenza degli interessati le cui offerte tecniche siano state qualificate.
14. Le offerte presentate dopo l’orario stabilito non saranno accettate.
15. Nessun offerente potrà ritirare, modificare o correggere la sua offerta dopo che questa
sia stata presentata e aperta, senza la perdita della garanzia d’offerta (art. 85 della legge n. 622,
“Ley de Contrataciones Municipales”).
16. L’ammontare per la esecuzione della presente gara d’appalto è di 1.3 milioni di euro.
17. L’offerta economica deve includere una garanzia di mantenimento dell’offerta per l’ammontare di tredicimila euro (€ 13.000,00). La mancanza di tale garanzia è motivo di rifiuto dell’offerta.
Ing. Sandra Moreno Ayestas
Segretaria generale
Dipco n. 16/2008
78
Avviso di gara
Republic of Macedonia
Ministry of Health
Procurement Tender No: 01/IK-2007
1. The Government of Macedonia has received a soft loan from the Italian Government
toward the cost of the: “Rationalization of the management system and modernization of the
technological biomedical park”, and intends to apply part of this soft loan to cover the costs of
the Contract for “Purchase, delivery, installation, commissioning and training (where requested)
of Hospital and Health centre equipment” to a maximal amount of Euro 1.414.000. This
procurement is divided in the following lots:
Quantity:
Lot #.1:
Operating Table for Surgery
Scialytic Lamp with satellite, 80.000-100.000 Lux
Patient Monitor
Central patient monitoring system with 10 monitors
TOTAL BUDGET:
Lot #.2:
Anaesthesia machine with monitor
Respirator connected to gas system - VENTILATOR
Respirator with compressor - VENTILATOR
TOTAL BUDGET:
Lot #.3:
Dialysis machines
10
10
4
1
395.000 Euro
10
8
3
681.000 Euro
26
TOTAL BUDGET:
338.000 Euro
2. The above Ministry now invites sealed bids having the following minimum requirements:
• Eligible and qualified Italian Companies only, or eligible and qualified Italian companies
associations;
• Declarations of the firm as to the capital of the firm, the turnover in the three business
years prior to the tender;
• The tenderer and manufacturer (if different) must hold ISO 9000/9001;
• Experience in selling medical equipment in the last 3 years.
3. A complete set of Bidding Documents in English may be purchased by interested
bidders on the submission of a written Application to the address below and upon payment of
a non refundable fee of € 200.
Account details - for payments in EUR only - Correspondent bank details (:56:): DEUTSCHE
BUNDESBANK ZENTRALE - Address: Wilhelm Epstein strasse 14 - Frankfurt am Main GERMANY - SWIFT BIC: MARK DE FF Bank details (:57:): NATIONAL BANK OF THE REPUBLIC
OF MACEDONIA - Address: Kompleks Banki bb - 1000 Skopje - MACEDONIA - Swift bic: nbrm
mk 2 X - Final beneficiary (:59:): - IBAN MK 07 1007 0100 0006 669 - Name: Ministry of Health.
4. Bids must be delivered to the address below at or before 12:00 a.m. of the 07.06.2008.
79
Dipco n. 16/2008
5. The invitation to tender was published in the Official Gazette of Italian Republic G.U.R.I.
- of 09.04.2008 n. 42 V Serie speciale - Contratti pubblici.
Kiro Salvani, MD - State Secretary, Ministry of Health
50 Divizija 6, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
Tel. +389 2 3123009; +389 2 3119679
Fax. +389 2 3113014
e-mail: [email protected]
L’avviso è stato pubblicato sui quotidiani “Il Sole 24 ore”, “Corriere della Sera” e “La
Repubblica” in data 14 aprile 2008.
Dipco n. 16/2008
80
TARIFFE ABBONAMENTI 2008
Abbonamento annuale (Spedizione in abbonamento postale)
Euro
200,00
Prezzo di ogni fascicolo
Euro
6,00
(Per l’estero le tariffe sono raddoppiate)
Per informazioni rivolgersi al servizio abbonamenti della
STILGRAFICA srl - 00159 Roma - Via Ignazio Pettinengo, 31/33
Tel. 06/43588200 (4 linee r.a.) Fax 06/4385693
[email protected]
L’eventuale fatturazione e l’incasso verranno effettuati per il tramite della
STILGRAFICA srl
ABBONAMENTI GRATUITI
Enti pubblici, istituzioni, organismi internazionali, Ong e associazioni senza fini di lucro, giornalisti e operatori nel settore della cooperazione allo sviluppo possono richiedere di ricevere
gratuitamente il bollettino “Dipco”. Gli abbonamenti gratuiti saranno attivati fino ad esaurimento delle copie disponibili.
Le richieste vanno indirizzate al Ministero degli Affari Esteri - Direzione generale per la cooperazione allo sviluppo - Ufficio I - P.le della Farnesina, 1 - 00194 Roma ([email protected]).
BOLLETTINO SETTIMANALE DEL MINISTERO DEGLI AFFARI ESTERI
REGISTRAZIONE DEL TRIBUNALE DI ROMA n° 271/84 del 4.7.1984
Poste Italiane S.p.A. Spedizione in abbonamento postale
D.L. 353/2003 (conv. in L. 27/02/2004 n. 46)
art. 1 comma 1 DCB - ROMA
ANNO XXV - N. 16 - 24 APRILE 2008
SOCIETÀ EDITRICE, REDAZIONE, AMMINISTRAZIONE, STAMPA
STILGRAFICA srl - VIA IGNAZIO PETTINENGO, 31/33 - 00159 ROMA
TEL. (06) 43588200 - FAX (06) 4385693