Roma in public housing

Rom in Toscana 2012
Tipologie di insediamento
10
1
50
-3
15
1
-1
00
0
-1
51
4
-5
-2
25
0
2) Villaggi
Seravezza
Massa
Montignoso
Pietrasanta
50
1) Insediamenti ufficiali o riconosciuti
Carrara
Pistoia
Montemurlo
50
-3
15
1
-1
00
0
-1
10
1
Prato
25
0
Buggiano
51
-2
-5
4
Sesto Fiorentino
Lucca
50
Pietrasanta
3) Insediamenti non autorizzati
Viareggio
Montecarlo
Poggio a Caiano
50
-3
-1
00
0
-1
25
15
1
Firenze
10
1
San Miniato
Cascina
51
-5
4
-2
0
San Giuliano Terme
50
Altopascio
4) Aree private
Grosseto
Roma in Tuscany 2012
Settlements tipology
1) Authorised or recognised settlements
2) Villages
3) Not authorised settlements
4) Private areas
50
-3
15
1
-1
00
10
1
0
-1
51
25
-5
4
-2
0
Livorno
50
Pisa
Rom in Toscana 2012
Gruppi H provenienzH
10
1
51
50
-3
15
1
-1
00
0
-1
4
-5
-2
25
0
Rom romeni
Seravezza
Massa
Montignoso
Pietrasanta
50
Rom ex Iugoslavia
Carrara
Pistoia
Montemurlo
50
-3
15
1
-1
00
0
-1
10
1
Prato
25
0
Buggiano
51
-2
-5
4
Sesto Fiorentino
Lucca
50
Pietrasanta
Rom istriani
Viareggio
Montecarlo
Poggio a Caiano
50
-3
-1
00
0
-1
25
15
1
Firenze
10
1
San Miniato
Cascina
51
-5
4
-2
0
San Giuliano Terme
50
Altopascio
Sinti
10
1
50
-3
15
1
-1
00
0
-1
25
51
-5
4
-2
0
50
Pisa
Sinti, rom romeni, rom ex Iugoslavia
Rom in Tuscany 2012 Groups and origins: Ex Iugoslavia rom
; Romanian rom
Istrianian rom;
Sinti
50
-3
15
1
-1
00
10
1
0
-1
51
-5
25
0
-2
4
Grosseto
50
Livorno
Sinti,romanian rom and ex Iugoslavia rom
Roma and Sinti settlements in Tuscany
Different phases of settlements
Current roma s communities situation in Tuscany should be interpreted by the different phases that characterized their
settlement in the area.
The Eighties and Nineties: romas migration from ex Jugoslavia countries
Nomad camps in Tuscany are the outcome of a first migration s phase started at the end of the eighties and
consolidated in the nineties. These are groups mostly coming from Kosovo and Macedonia.
In the mid-nineties the authorised settlements by municipality (and a lot of not authorised, but
recognised ,
settlements) had more then 2.500 roma and sinti.
Nowadays there are about 1.200 roma and sinti in nomad camps .
The years Two thousand: romanian roma
Since 2000 begin new roma migratory flows from Romania (most arrivals are between 2005 and 2007). These new
irregular settlements are excluded from the programs of nomadic camps overcoming.
An ancient presence: the sinti
These are italian resident citezens, lot of them stopped in some ares because of the total or partial relinquishment of their
travelling occupations. They are present in official settlements or in private areas; the latter solution represents a
settlement practice expressing exit and resistance strategy from institutional answer as for example nomad camps.
Roma and Sinti settlements in Tuscany
Presences for Province
Province
Presences
In 1995 about 2.500 Rom e Sinti
lived in “camps”, most of them
not authorised or recognised
Pisa
864
Firenze
638
Lucca
348
Pistoia
216
Settlements tipology
Massa Carrara
148
Village
Grosseto
94
Recognised settlements
Prato
313
Not authorised settlements
353
Livorno
70
Private areas
485
TOTAL
2.691
TOTAL
Presences
524
1.329
2.691
The orang colored numbers are reported to the end of 2011
Roma and Sinti settlements in Tuscany
Roma in public housing
Data are reported to the end of 2011
Città
n. famiglie
persone
Bagno a Ripoli (FI)
1
5
Rom
Campi Bisenzio (FI)
6
30
Rom
Carrara
1
5
Sinti
Collesalvetti (LI)
1
9
Rom
Empoli (FI) (emergenza abitativa)
9
38
Sinti
Grosseto (emergenza abitativa e ERP)
4
30
2 famiglie Rom - 2 famiglie Sinti
Firenze
75
circa 405
Lucca (emergenza abitativa e ERP)
23
94
Sinti in maggioranza
Massa
2
15
Sinti
Montemurlo
1
1
Sinti
Pisa (ERP)
12
55
Rom
Pontassieve (FI)
1
2
Rom
Santa Croce (PI) (alloggi emergenza)
2
11
Rom
Sesto Fiorentino (FI)
6
36
Rom
Siena (emergenza abitativa)
2
11
Rom rumeni
146
746
TOTALE
gruppi
Rom
Rom in Toscana 2012
Livello di criticità
10
1
50
-3
15
1
-1
00
0
-1
51
4
-5
25
-2
0
Media
Seravezza
Massa
Montignoso
Pietrasanta
50
Alta
Carrara
Pistoia
Montemurlo
50
-3
15
1
-1
00
0
-1
10
1
Prato
25
0
Buggiano
51
-2
-5
4
Sesto Fiorentino
Lucca
50
Pietrasanta
Bassa
Viareggio
Montecarlo
Poggio a Caiano
50
-3
-1
00
0
-1
25
15
1
Firenze
10
1
San Miniato
Cascina
51
-5
4
-2
0
San Giuliano Terme
50
Altopascio
Nessuna
50
-3
15
1
10
1
-1
00
0
-1
25
51
-5
4
-2
0
50
Pisa
Level of criticality
Livorno
Grosseto
1) 
2) 
3) 
4) 
High
Avarage
Low
None
Rom in Toscana 2012
High criticality for groups
Alta criticità per gruppi
10
1
51
50
-3
15
1
-1
00
0
-1
4
-5
-2
25
0
Rom romeni
Seravezza
Massa
Montignoso
Pietrasanta
50
Rom ex Iugoslavia
Carrara
Pistoia
Montemurlo
50
-3
15
1
-1
00
0
-1
10
1
Prato
25
0
Buggiano
51
-2
-5
4
Sesto Fiorentino
Lucca
50
Pietrasanta
Rom istriani
Viareggio
Montecarlo
Poggio a Caiano
50
-3
-1
00
0
-1
25
15
1
Firenze
10
1
San Miniato
Cascina
51
-5
4
-2
0
San Giuliano Terme
50
Altopascio
Sinti
10
1
50
-3
15
1
-1
00
0
-1
25
51
-5
4
-2
0
50
Pisa
Sinti, rom romeni, rom ex Iugoslavia
50
-3
15
1
-1
00
10
1
0
-1
51
25
-5
4
-2
0
Grosseto
50
Livorno
!"#$%&$'"()*&*$+,-+
./0%*$)1%2%)%2j$3/1$41533%
3>3
C
BA
B
B=
B
A=
A=
3>3
B
==
>3B
>3A
!"#$1"#/&%
2/*$,/00$
+$##$
+&-%"9-&#&
!"/%*$#$-%$
AB
3
?A
3
=3
>3?
@
=
!"#$/6$754"(8*9%*
1$**$*$
!"#%&"$
+&-%/7(*5&
BA
B
3>3
C
A=
A=
3>3
B
==
AB
3
B=
B
!*$%&
>3B
=
?A
3
<(99"$-&
>3A
2/#%&3."&*/-%"-&
'())$
=3
>3?
@
!"/%*$#$-%$
!"#$%(21%*&%
8"$*/99"&
+&-%/)$*5&
!&99"&3$31$"$-&
A=
BA
B
3>3
C
A=
3>3
B
>3B
=
B=
B
."*/-0/
AB
3
2$-3+"-"$%&
1$#)"-$
=
=
>3A
?A
3
2$-34"(5"$-&36/*7/
=3
>3?
@
:5%&;$#)"&
:%&2%
A=
BA
B
3>3
C
3>3
B
A=
==
B=
B
AB
3
>3B
=
>3A
?A
3
=3
>3?
@
!"#$
:%&2%;$1"#$1"#/&%;$1"#$/6$754"(8*9%*
BA
B
3>3
C
A=
A=
3>3
B
==
B=
B
AB
3
>3B
=
>3A
?A
3
4*&##/%&
=3
>3?
@
'",&*-&
Medium Criticality for
groups