UPC Case Management System
Transcript
UPC Case Management System
UPC Case Management System UPC Case Management System Dario Pizzolante Chair of UPC IT Working Group Cristiano Morganti Project Manager Net Service SpA Cristina Carpani Requirements Manager Net Service SpA Palazzo Turati, Milano, November 9th 2016 UPC Case Management System Agenda Unified Patent Court – Brief Overview Organization IT Working Group UPC Case Management System Structure Functionalities Integration Walkthrough User Interface Sunrise Tasks 2 November 9th 2016 UPC Case Management System Agenda Unified Patent Court – Brief Overview Organization IT Working Group UPC Case Management System Structure Functionalities Integration Walkthrough User Interface Sunrise Tasks 3 November 9th 2016 UPC Case Management System Unified Patent Court – Project Organisation International Agreement Entity based on Agreement among 25 EU Member States Transitional Period Financially self-sustainable / autonomous after transitional period Preparatory Committee Until entry into force of UPC Agreement Mandate by member states for overseeing the work streams for the setup of the Court Working Groups 4 Legal Information Technology Financial Human Resources Facilities November 9th 2016 UPC Case Management System November 9th 2016 Unified Patent Court - Future Organisation European Court of Justice Court of Appeal Luxembourg Technically Legally qualified judges qualified judges Court of First Instance Brussels, Budapest, Copenhagen, Dusseldorf, The Hague, Hamburg, Helsinki, Lisbon, Ljubljana, London , Mannheim, Milan, Munich, Paris, Vienna 5 Regional divisions Central division Local divisions Munich Mechanical engineering Paris Seat Electrical engineering London Chemistry and pharmaceuticals Baltic for Sweden, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania Eastern for Bulgaria and Romania UPC Case Management System November 9th 2016 IT Working Group - methodology and approach CMS Configuration phase User needs Configure / Show / Iterate Frequent Releases Moving Requirements Workshops London Venice (European Patent Judges Forum) Stockholm The Hague Luxembourg Dusseldorf Munich Rome Paris Milan Global Reach Live user testing: CMS Beta Web site 6 Monthly IT Working Groups Preparatory Committee Agreement & Endorsement UPC Case Management System IT Working Group – Major Milestones CMS Current Status Rules of Procedure (ROP) Rules of Registry ROP 5: Opt-out of a EP EPO – UPC Ongoing and Future Milestones Security Model Facilities – IT requirements Corporate Functions Finance, Human Resources Payment system integration IT Governance Model 7 November 9th 2016 UPC Case Management System November 9th 2016 IT Working Group – Future IT Strategy & Governance IT as strategic asset Dematerialized Court relying predominantly on IT services Mobility Centralized Governance for IT (under review) At Registry (Luxembourg) IT Strategy & Support Central hub for UPC solutions and shared IT services CMS, Corporate Web Site, Mail, Collaboration System… Corporate Functions: Finance, HR, Accounting, Payments Operated by Luxembourg Government during transitional phase of 7 years Support Model (under review) 1st line of defence: by Key Users in Central, Local and Regional Divisions (includes support for local IT Facilities) 2nd line: Escalation at Registry (IT hub in Luxembourg) 3rd line: Escalation at Vendors 8 UPC Case Management System Agenda Unified Patent Court – Brief Overview Organization IT Working Group UPC Case Management System Structure Functionalities Integration Walkthrough User Interface Sunrise Tasks 9 November 9th 2016 UPC Case Management System November 9th 2016 The Project 1/2 A Case Management System (CMS) is being implemented to serve as a core collaboration platform for performing the tasks of the UPC. The Unified Patent Court (UPC) will be a court common to the Contracting Member States and part of their judicial system. The UPC will have competence to hear disputes regarding the European Patents and the new Unitary Patents granted by the European Patent Office (EPO). 10 UPC Case Management System The Project Live User Testing: Secure.Unified-Patent-Court.org 1000+ Users created accounts 2000+ Accesses, 700+ Direct feedback 44 Countries visited the site 11 November 9th 2016 2/2 UPC Case Management System CMS Structure Single Platform and Data Repository Role-based Profiles Claimant (Lawyer) Defendant (Lawyer) Clerk Registrar Judge Case Management Actions Applications Workflow Task assignment Activities and Documents Tracking Access to information 12 Website – Public Info Confidentiality November 9th 2016 1/2 UPC Case Management System CMS Structure 13 November 9th 2016 2/2 UPC Case Management System CMS Functional Overview USERS Internal actors (they are registered by the System Administrator) internal user – clerks internal user – judges Administrator(s) External actors (they apply for registration before accessing the system ) external user claimant (individual, company, lawyer) external user defendant external user – third party (technician, witness, expert) External corporate actors (companies, authorized law firms) are represented by individual users who act on their behalf with different privileges. 14 November 9th 2016 1/4 UPC Case Management System CMS Functional Overview November 9th 2016 2/4 PROCESSES Cases are represented by specific processes (Infringement Action, Revocation Action, …) A process is organized as a system of logically interconnected sub processes (Submit a Statement of Claim, Raise a Preliminary Objection, Issue an Order, …) Dashboard allows users to know what has been done and what is left to do to achieve the next step in the procedure Timers ensure that every action is accomplished within a specified amount of time or by a given deadline 15 UPC Case Management System November 9th 2016 CMS Functional Overview 3/4 DOCUMENTS 16 Actions are built around documents A document is obtained by merging data specified by the user into a template, or by uploading it into the system Documents are stored into a document system. Meta data are saved into a database for subsequent quick searches If a document is submitted by an external user, it is checked and validated/rejected. If rejected, a request for amendments allows the author to submit a new version A document evolves through its versions Each version is assigned a language, a submission date and time Each document can be qualified as confidential UPC Case Management System CMS Functional Overview ACCESS TO INFORMATION Open data Live publication on Court Website Confidentiality management Electronic filing and case management system On-line access and case management for UPC judges and staff SECURITY Strong Authentication of Users Secure exchange of documents internally and externally User roles and profiles with specific rights on read and write 17 November 9th 2016 4/4 UPC Case Management System Agenda Unified Patent Court – Brief Overview Organization IT Working Group UPC Case Management System Structure Functionalities Integration Walkthrough User Interface Sunrise Tasks 18 November 9th 2016 UPC Case Management System CMS Walkthrough Sections of the CMS Menu, dashboard, search, document and data Actions (Infringement, Revocation) Written, Interim, Oral Procedures Applications Procedure for applications to the Court Current configuration of forms, processes and templates is the result of functional analysis on ROPs, workshops and on-line Users feedback CMS structure allows for changes and optimisation on all aspects 19 November 9th 2016 1/2 UPC Case Management System CMS Walkthrough SUNRISE FUNCTIONALITIES 20 CMS User Creation Authentication Registration as a Representative before the UPC Patent Opt-out and Withdrawal of Opt-out Lists November 9th 2016 2/2 UPC Case Management System Thank you www.unified-patent-court.org secure.unified-patent-court.org For inquiries: unified-patent-court.org/contact 21 November 9th 2016